Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. Translation: Microsoft will force people to use the web interface that they have maintained so poorly for years and that is the least reliable and least feature-rich interface for these "forums" that I am aware of. Confirmation of that fact comes from the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx. In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The only potentially good thing to come out of this.... "Q: What should newsgroup users prepare for that will be different? [....] Additionally, Microsoft newsgroups are not moderated, while the forums will be." But the operative word is "potentially". First, Microsoft has demonstrated complete ineptitude in managing "forums". Their tools do not work. MS does not respond to problem reports. In fact, they do not even provide an effective way to report problems with "forums". Second, moderating a group is either highly labor-intensive or useless (just a pass-thru). But if the moderation is real (and effective), that will mean that postings will incur delays. Moreover, I have never heard of moderation done on a scale this large. Consider the traffic in the m.p.excel newsgroups alone. Well, perhaps Microsoft will depend on MVPs to be moderators. Oh well.... ----- original message ----- wrote in message ... Date 5/4/2010 Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. This decision is in response to worldwide market trends and evolving customer needs. Microsoft continues to invest in forums to reduce customer effort, consolidate community venues and make it easier for active contributors to retain their influence. Forums provide a healthy community environment with less spam and make answers easier to find by customers and search engines. Additionally, forums offer a better user and off-topic management platform that will improve customer satisfaction by facilitating discussions in a clean space. We understand that some newsgroups are still active, and important to the community. In the coming days and weeks, we will be rolling out tools and resources to minimize disruption to the community discussions. We are working diligently on providing additional resources and information in local languages later this week. In the meantime, please refer to the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx concerning this issue. The Microsoft Newsgroup website will be made available in additional languages in the next few days. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
__________________
I am not human. I am an Excel Wizard |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum:
http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx I've started posting there. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Joe User" <joeu2004 wrote in message ... wrote: Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. Translation: Microsoft will force people to use the web interface that they have maintained so poorly for years and that is the least reliable and least feature-rich interface for these "forums" that I am aware of. Confirmation of that fact comes from the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx. In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The only potentially good thing to come out of this.... "Q: What should newsgroup users prepare for that will be different? [....] Additionally, Microsoft newsgroups are not moderated, while the forums will be." But the operative word is "potentially". First, Microsoft has demonstrated complete ineptitude in managing "forums". Their tools do not work. MS does not respond to problem reports. In fact, they do not even provide an effective way to report problems with "forums". Second, moderating a group is either highly labor-intensive or useless (just a pass-thru). But if the moderation is real (and effective), that will mean that postings will incur delays. Moreover, I have never heard of moderation done on a scale this large. Consider the traffic in the m.p.excel newsgroups alone. Well, perhaps Microsoft will depend on MVPs to be moderators. Oh well.... ----- original message ----- wrote in message ... Date 5/4/2010 Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. This decision is in response to worldwide market trends and evolving customer needs. Microsoft continues to invest in forums to reduce customer effort, consolidate community venues and make it easier for active contributors to retain their influence. Forums provide a healthy community environment with less spam and make answers easier to find by customers and search engines. Additionally, forums offer a better user and off-topic management platform that will improve customer satisfaction by facilitating discussions in a clean space. We understand that some newsgroups are still active, and important to the community. In the coming days and weeks, we will be rolling out tools and resources to minimize disruption to the community discussions. We are working diligently on providing additional resources and information in local languages later this week. In the meantime, please refer to the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx concerning this issue. The Microsoft Newsgroup website will be made available in additional languages in the next few days. |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Microsoft point the general forums url at:
http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx The new Excel forums are at various addresses, for example the worksheet.functions forum is now available at: http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...&lang=en&cr=US Which seem very different to the forums at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx So, confusion already then... Neither are very nice in terms of keeping an eye on progressing threads, filtering/sorting threads, etc., and if you want to store a message for offline reading - well, good luck attempting that. Personally, I think I'll stick to the newsgroup method until it's no longer running. "T. Valko" wrote in message ... I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx I've started posting there. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Joe User" <joeu2004 wrote in message ... wrote: Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. Translation: Microsoft will force people to use the web interface that they have maintained so poorly for years and that is the least reliable and least feature-rich interface for these "forums" that I am aware of. Confirmation of that fact comes from the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx. In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The only potentially good thing to come out of this.... "Q: What should newsgroup users prepare for that will be different? [....] Additionally, Microsoft newsgroups are not moderated, while the forums will be." But the operative word is "potentially". First, Microsoft has demonstrated complete ineptitude in managing "forums". Their tools do not work. MS does not respond to problem reports. In fact, they do not even provide an effective way to report problems with "forums". Second, moderating a group is either highly labor-intensive or useless (just a pass-thru). But if the moderation is real (and effective), that will mean that postings will incur delays. Moreover, I have never heard of moderation done on a scale this large. Consider the traffic in the m.p.excel newsgroups alone. Well, perhaps Microsoft will depend on MVPs to be moderators. Oh well.... ----- original message ----- wrote in message ... Date 5/4/2010 Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. This decision is in response to worldwide market trends and evolving customer needs. Microsoft continues to invest in forums to reduce customer effort, consolidate community venues and make it easier for active contributors to retain their influence. Forums provide a healthy community environment with less spam and make answers easier to find by customers and search engines. Additionally, forums offer a better user and off-topic management platform that will improve customer satisfaction by facilitating discussions in a clean space. We understand that some newsgroups are still active, and important to the community. In the coming days and weeks, we will be rolling out tools and resources to minimize disruption to the community discussions. We are working diligently on providing additional resources and information in local languages later this week. In the meantime, please refer to the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx concerning this issue. The Microsoft Newsgroup website will be made available in additional languages in the next few days. |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm with you, Steve. Newsgroups are so much easier than web-based forums.
I'll stick with them until forced to change. This may be a blessing in disguise. I remember when Quicken switch to a web-based interface that was at least as bad as Excel's. It became so frustrating I gave up, and put my time to "better" use. Maybe the same thing will happen to Excel. Regards, Fred "Steve Dunn" wrote in message ... Microsoft point the general forums url at: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx The new Excel forums are at various addresses, for example the worksheet.functions forum is now available at: http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...&lang=en&cr=US Which seem very different to the forums at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx So, confusion already then... Neither are very nice in terms of keeping an eye on progressing threads, filtering/sorting threads, etc., and if you want to store a message for offline reading - well, good luck attempting that. Personally, I think I'll stick to the newsgroup method until it's no longer running. "T. Valko" wrote in message ... I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx I've started posting there. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Joe User" <joeu2004 wrote in message ... wrote: Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. Translation: Microsoft will force people to use the web interface that they have maintained so poorly for years and that is the least reliable and least feature-rich interface for these "forums" that I am aware of. Confirmation of that fact comes from the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx. In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The only potentially good thing to come out of this.... "Q: What should newsgroup users prepare for that will be different? [....] Additionally, Microsoft newsgroups are not moderated, while the forums will be." But the operative word is "potentially". First, Microsoft has demonstrated complete ineptitude in managing "forums". Their tools do not work. MS does not respond to problem reports. In fact, they do not even provide an effective way to report problems with "forums". Second, moderating a group is either highly labor-intensive or useless (just a pass-thru). But if the moderation is real (and effective), that will mean that postings will incur delays. Moreover, I have never heard of moderation done on a scale this large. Consider the traffic in the m.p.excel newsgroups alone. Well, perhaps Microsoft will depend on MVPs to be moderators. Oh well.... ----- original message ----- wrote in message ... Date 5/4/2010 Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. This decision is in response to worldwide market trends and evolving customer needs. Microsoft continues to invest in forums to reduce customer effort, consolidate community venues and make it easier for active contributors to retain their influence. Forums provide a healthy community environment with less spam and make answers easier to find by customers and search engines. Additionally, forums offer a better user and off-topic management platform that will improve customer satisfaction by facilitating discussions in a clean space. We understand that some newsgroups are still active, and important to the community. In the coming days and weeks, we will be rolling out tools and resources to minimize disruption to the community discussions. We are working diligently on providing additional resources and information in local languages later this week. In the meantime, please refer to the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx concerning this issue. The Microsoft Newsgroup website will be made available in additional languages in the next few days. |
#6
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming,microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think I will try the new forum before I express an opinion on whether it is
better or worse. Just my 2 cents. -- HTH... Jim Thomlinson "Joe User" wrote: wrote: Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. Translation: Microsoft will force people to use the web interface that they have maintained so poorly for years and that is the least reliable and least feature-rich interface for these "forums" that I am aware of. Confirmation of that fact comes from the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx. In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The only potentially good thing to come out of this.... "Q: What should newsgroup users prepare for that will be different? [....] Additionally, Microsoft newsgroups are not moderated, while the forums will be." But the operative word is "potentially". First, Microsoft has demonstrated complete ineptitude in managing "forums". Their tools do not work. MS does not respond to problem reports. In fact, they do not even provide an effective way to report problems with "forums". Second, moderating a group is either highly labor-intensive or useless (just a pass-thru). But if the moderation is real (and effective), that will mean that postings will incur delays. Moreover, I have never heard of moderation done on a scale this large. Consider the traffic in the m.p.excel newsgroups alone. Well, perhaps Microsoft will depend on MVPs to be moderators. Oh well.... ----- original message ----- wrote in message ... Date 5/4/2010 Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. This decision is in response to worldwide market trends and evolving customer needs. Microsoft continues to invest in forums to reduce customer effort, consolidate community venues and make it easier for active contributors to retain their influence. Forums provide a healthy community environment with less spam and make answers easier to find by customers and search engines. Additionally, forums offer a better user and off-topic management platform that will improve customer satisfaction by facilitating discussions in a clean space. We understand that some newsgroups are still active, and important to the community. In the coming days and weeks, we will be rolling out tools and resources to minimize disruption to the community discussions. We are working diligently on providing additional resources and information in local languages later this week. In the meantime, please refer to the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx concerning this issue. The Microsoft Newsgroup website will be made available in additional languages in the next few days. . |
#7
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming,microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To expand on what I said...
I like the way the news group works. It is simple and intuitive. The only issues I have so far is that I don't want to lose the body of work that exists in these forums. I often find myself searching for posts that I read long ago. Secondly I am not sure that I like the new categories for XL. Noteably the programming forum is gone. That being said the current categories are not perfect either. -- HTH... Jim Thomlinson "Jim Thomlinson" wrote: I think I will try the new forum before I express an opinion on whether it is better or worse. Just my 2 cents. -- HTH... Jim Thomlinson "Joe User" wrote: wrote: Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. Translation: Microsoft will force people to use the web interface that they have maintained so poorly for years and that is the least reliable and least feature-rich interface for these "forums" that I am aware of. Confirmation of that fact comes from the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx. In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The only potentially good thing to come out of this.... "Q: What should newsgroup users prepare for that will be different? [....] Additionally, Microsoft newsgroups are not moderated, while the forums will be." But the operative word is "potentially". First, Microsoft has demonstrated complete ineptitude in managing "forums". Their tools do not work. MS does not respond to problem reports. In fact, they do not even provide an effective way to report problems with "forums". Second, moderating a group is either highly labor-intensive or useless (just a pass-thru). But if the moderation is real (and effective), that will mean that postings will incur delays. Moreover, I have never heard of moderation done on a scale this large. Consider the traffic in the m.p.excel newsgroups alone. Well, perhaps Microsoft will depend on MVPs to be moderators. Oh well.... ----- original message ----- wrote in message ... Date 5/4/2010 Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. This decision is in response to worldwide market trends and evolving customer needs. Microsoft continues to invest in forums to reduce customer effort, consolidate community venues and make it easier for active contributors to retain their influence. Forums provide a healthy community environment with less spam and make answers easier to find by customers and search engines. Additionally, forums offer a better user and off-topic management platform that will improve customer satisfaction by facilitating discussions in a clean space. We understand that some newsgroups are still active, and important to the community. In the coming days and weeks, we will be rolling out tools and resources to minimize disruption to the community discussions. We are working diligently on providing additional resources and information in local languages later this week. In the meantime, please refer to the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx concerning this issue. The Microsoft Newsgroup website will be made available in additional languages in the next few days. . |
#8
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"T. Valko" wrote:
I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx Maybe you should be before you cast aspersions on someone else. So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. Not sure if you are calling me a liar, or you think I am incapable of copy-and-pasting, or you simply cannot read. I quoted what that link mentions. I wrote: In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx Yes, that is another way to get the same new Excel forums, apparently. But the two top-level web sites are very different, at least in appearance. I cannot explain to you why Microsoft has two different ways to go to the same place. But that does not make you right and me wrong. It is not the first time that Microsoft has maintained two different ways to access the same forums. Jerry Lewis made me aware of two ways to access (some of) the "Discussion Groups": www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us, which I have always used, and http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...s/default.mspx, which Jerry was using recently. But in fact, the web site I used has a more complete list of Excel "Discussion Groups" than the web site that Jerry used. Caveat emptor. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! There is nothing inherently wrong with a web interface. Google Groups is a web interface, and I find it reasonably adequate. I was commenting on Microsoft's historical failure to maintain a reliable interface, web or otherwise. (Not to say that GG is perfect.) Also, Microsoft's historical poor support of the interfaces that they provide. Even with the new Excel forums, I do not see any way to report problems to Microsoft. (But that might be my oversight. I just looked for the obvious "contact us" link on one web page.) I also raised concerns (along with compliments) about how that moderator process might work. This is based on two decades of experience with moderated NGs. Perhaps MVP Ron Coderre can offer some insight. Apparently he is the moderator (or one of them) of some of the new Excel forums. Lastly, my chief concern is that there will no longer be an alternative if/when posting problems arise with the new Excel forum. And I will no longer be able to troubleshoot and explain those problems, like deleted postings. You have personally benefitted from that just recently. Oh well, it's a done deal. I am not trying to complain. I am merely trying to set expectations. ----- original message ----- "T. Valko" wrote in message ... I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx I've started posting there. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Joe User" <joeu2004 wrote in message ... wrote: Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. Translation: Microsoft will force people to use the web interface that they have maintained so poorly for years and that is the least reliable and least feature-rich interface for these "forums" that I am aware of. Confirmation of that fact comes from the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx. In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The only potentially good thing to come out of this.... "Q: What should newsgroup users prepare for that will be different? [....] Additionally, Microsoft newsgroups are not moderated, while the forums will be." But the operative word is "potentially". First, Microsoft has demonstrated complete ineptitude in managing "forums". Their tools do not work. MS does not respond to problem reports. In fact, they do not even provide an effective way to report problems with "forums". Second, moderating a group is either highly labor-intensive or useless (just a pass-thru). But if the moderation is real (and effective), that will mean that postings will incur delays. Moreover, I have never heard of moderation done on a scale this large. Consider the traffic in the m.p.excel newsgroups alone. Well, perhaps Microsoft will depend on MVPs to be moderators. Oh well.... ----- original message ----- wrote in message ... Date 5/4/2010 Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. This decision is in response to worldwide market trends and evolving customer needs. Microsoft continues to invest in forums to reduce customer effort, consolidate community venues and make it easier for active contributors to retain their influence. Forums provide a healthy community environment with less spam and make answers easier to find by customers and search engines. Additionally, forums offer a better user and off-topic management platform that will improve customer satisfaction by facilitating discussions in a clean space. We understand that some newsgroups are still active, and important to the community. In the coming days and weeks, we will be rolling out tools and resources to minimize disruption to the community discussions. We are working diligently on providing additional resources and information in local languages later this week. In the meantime, please refer to the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx concerning this issue. The Microsoft Newsgroup website will be made available in additional languages in the next few days. |
#9
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So will google groups still access this forum once it relocates??
|
#10
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming,microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Thomlinson" wrote:
I think I will try the new forum before I express an opinion on whether it is better or worse. You are right: I had not looked. Not that I have, I can offer the opinion that I think the interface is even worse that the "Discussion Groups" interface, if you can imagine that. (But of course, that is only one opinion. To each his own.) But I hasten to note that my previous comments were not intended to be about the interface per se. I was not expressing any opinion then about whether it is better or worse. Frankly, I don't care one way or the other. I was expressing concern that Microsoft was limiting "forum" access to Microsoft's method. My concern is based on Microsoft's historical failure to maintain a reliable interface (web or otherwise, makes no difference to me), and its historical failure to provide reason support of their interface, e.g. a rudimentary "contact us" link to report problems. (No matter: Microsoft does not address reported problems anyway. ;-) I also expressed concern (along with compliments) about the moderator process. That is based on two decades of experience with the NG moderator process. The good: hopefully less spam, if not none at all. The bad: potential delays, and possible censorship. MVP Ron Coderre can offer his insight. Apparently he is (one of) the moderator for (some of) the new Excel forums. (Note to Ron: I hope you have alternate moderators. That is essential to process.) Lastly, I was expressing concern about having only one method for posting inquiries/responses -- a single point of failure. We have benefitted from having multiple methods; when your favorite method encountered problems, there was another method to post a "what's happening?" question, at the very least. Moreover, the openness of the NG server and the alternative archive sites permitted me to troubleshoot and explain some posting problems. I have dispelled some misunderstandings; and I have exposed some bad practices on the MSnews server in particular. The opaqueness and uniqueness of the new forum interface makes all that impossible. So we are entirely dependent on Microsoft for support; and that comes full circle to my primary concern that Microsoft has proven unable or incapable of supporting such forums. Oh well, such as life.... ----- original message ----- "Jim Thomlinson" wrote in message ... I think I will try the new forum before I express an opinion on whether it is better or worse. Just my 2 cents. -- HTH... Jim Thomlinson "Joe User" wrote: wrote: Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. Translation: Microsoft will force people to use the web interface that they have maintained so poorly for years and that is the least reliable and least feature-rich interface for these "forums" that I am aware of. Confirmation of that fact comes from the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx. In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The only potentially good thing to come out of this.... "Q: What should newsgroup users prepare for that will be different? [....] Additionally, Microsoft newsgroups are not moderated, while the forums will be." But the operative word is "potentially". First, Microsoft has demonstrated complete ineptitude in managing "forums". Their tools do not work. MS does not respond to problem reports. In fact, they do not even provide an effective way to report problems with "forums". Second, moderating a group is either highly labor-intensive or useless (just a pass-thru). But if the moderation is real (and effective), that will mean that postings will incur delays. Moreover, I have never heard of moderation done on a scale this large. Consider the traffic in the m.p.excel newsgroups alone. Well, perhaps Microsoft will depend on MVPs to be moderators. Oh well.... ----- original message ----- wrote in message ... Date 5/4/2010 Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. This decision is in response to worldwide market trends and evolving customer needs. Microsoft continues to invest in forums to reduce customer effort, consolidate community venues and make it easier for active contributors to retain their influence. Forums provide a healthy community environment with less spam and make answers easier to find by customers and search engines. Additionally, forums offer a better user and off-topic management platform that will improve customer satisfaction by facilitating discussions in a clean space. We understand that some newsgroups are still active, and important to the community. In the coming days and weeks, we will be rolling out tools and resources to minimize disruption to the community discussions. We are working diligently on providing additional resources and information in local languages later this week. In the meantime, please refer to the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx concerning this issue. The Microsoft Newsgroup website will be made available in additional languages in the next few days. . |
#11
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jef Gorbach" wrote:
So will google groups still access this forum once it relocates?? That is not really possible, well at least not without significant investment by Google. Google relies on a particular network protocol (NNTP) to access the Microsoft forums archived on the MSnews server. Actually, Google relies on Giganews, which in turn relies on the MSnews server. Hypothetically, Microsoft might still mirror new forum activity on their MSnews server. That is how the current "Discussion Groups" forum works. But my understanding of their explanation is that they will not. They write: "Microsoft has a long history of establishing newsgroups that channel users and issues into the newsgroup (NNTP) space where information is shared and problems can be addressed by the community. [....] Using forums as the online support strategy will reduce the number of redundant resources and centralize content, making community contributions more broadly available and impactful. Beginning in June 2010, Microsoft will begin closing newsgroups and migrating users to Microsoft forums". It seems clear that they are contrasting "newsgroup" access with "forum" access, and they will be limiting access to the "forum" only through their interface. Theoretically, Google could design a program that "reads" the Microsoft web interface, sorts things out, and archives inquires and responses in the form that Google is accustomed to. After all, parsing HTML is Google's core business. However, I doubt that would happen. It would require that Google treat the Microsoft "newsgroups" differently from the many thousands of other newsgroups that Google archives. Moreover, Google Groups is not the only other way to access Microsoft newsgroups today. Even if GG implements a solution, users of the other alternatives will be affected adversely. To put all this in a positive light, I suspect that Microsoft's purpose is to shield its forums from spam. That would be a good thing, if Microsoft weren't so inept at supporting reliable forums. Of course, maybe Microsoft will change. ;-) |
#12
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wrote:
"Jef Gorbach" wrote: So will google groups still access this forum once it relocates?? That is not really possible, well at least not without significant investment by Google. I should clarify that I interpreted Jef's question to be: will Google Groups continue to track contributions made to the new forum? Two related questions a (a) whether GG (or Giganews) will continue to permit posting to its own set of microsoft.public newsgroups, creating an independent forum in effect; and (b) even if not, whether GG will keep its huge archive of old postings to microsoft.public newsgroups for searching and reading, and for how long? I suspect the answers are "no" and "probably not". With respect to #a, the newsgroup system (Usenet) is composed of an unstructured set of computers that lack any central administration or authority. So theoretically, GG could continue to maintain an active set of microsoft.public newsgroups, allowing users to access them exclusively through the GG web interface. Giganews could do essentially the same thing, and GG would never know the difference. (I don't know if Giganews has a user interface of its own.) However, note that Microsoft is a trademarked name; and the content of the microsoft.public NGs originate on Microsoft servers. So I expect that Microsoft will require that all well-known mirrors of the microsoft.public NGs stop providing active acccess -- that is, accepting postings. With respect to #b, the same legal issue applies to merely retaining an archive of old microsoft.public NGs. Even though the archives themselves are the property of their owners (e.g. GG), the NG names still contain a trademarked name. Whether or not Microsoft will stand on that principle, or GG renames those NGs in its archive, remains to be seen. But in any case, I doubt that GG would permit read and search access on those NGs, but not write access (posting). Of course, I don't know. We might have to just wait and see. ----- original message ----- "Joe User" <joeu2004 wrote in message ... "Jef Gorbach" wrote: So will google groups still access this forum once it relocates?? That is not really possible, well at least not without significant investment by Google. Google relies on a particular network protocol (NNTP) to access the Microsoft forums archived on the MSnews server. Actually, Google relies on Giganews, which in turn relies on the MSnews server. Hypothetically, Microsoft might still mirror new forum activity on their MSnews server. That is how the current "Discussion Groups" forum works. But my understanding of their explanation is that they will not. They write: "Microsoft has a long history of establishing newsgroups that channel users and issues into the newsgroup (NNTP) space where information is shared and problems can be addressed by the community. [....] Using forums as the online support strategy will reduce the number of redundant resources and centralize content, making community contributions more broadly available and impactful. Beginning in June 2010, Microsoft will begin closing newsgroups and migrating users to Microsoft forums". It seems clear that they are contrasting "newsgroup" access with "forum" access, and they will be limiting access to the "forum" only through their interface. Theoretically, Google could design a program that "reads" the Microsoft web interface, sorts things out, and archives inquires and responses in the form that Google is accustomed to. After all, parsing HTML is Google's core business. However, I doubt that would happen. It would require that Google treat the Microsoft "newsgroups" differently from the many thousands of other newsgroups that Google archives. Moreover, Google Groups is not the only other way to access Microsoft newsgroups today. Even if GG implements a solution, users of the other alternatives will be affected adversely. To put all this in a positive light, I suspect that Microsoft's purpose is to shield its forums from spam. That would be a good thing, if Microsoft weren't so inept at supporting reliable forums. Of course, maybe Microsoft will change. ;-) |
#13
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe you should be before you cast aspersions on someone else.
What? Who's casting aspersions? Not sure if you are calling me a liar... What? Where are you getting all this negative crap? All I said was I didn't read the link you provided and here's a link that I'm aware of to the new Excel forums. You seem to fly off the handle quite easily and often for reasons that I don't understand. So, to eliminate any further misunderstanding of any comments I may make I will no longer interact with you. I will never again reply to any of your posts and I will not acknowledge any of your replies to my posts. Good grief! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Joe User" <joeu2004 wrote in message ... "T. Valko" wrote: I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx Maybe you should be before you cast aspersions on someone else. So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. Not sure if you are calling me a liar, or you think I am incapable of copy-and-pasting, or you simply cannot read. I quoted what that link mentions. I wrote: In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx Yes, that is another way to get the same new Excel forums, apparently. But the two top-level web sites are very different, at least in appearance. I cannot explain to you why Microsoft has two different ways to go to the same place. But that does not make you right and me wrong. It is not the first time that Microsoft has maintained two different ways to access the same forums. Jerry Lewis made me aware of two ways to access (some of) the "Discussion Groups": www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us, which I have always used, and http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...s/default.mspx, which Jerry was using recently. But in fact, the web site I used has a more complete list of Excel "Discussion Groups" than the web site that Jerry used. Caveat emptor. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! There is nothing inherently wrong with a web interface. Google Groups is a web interface, and I find it reasonably adequate. I was commenting on Microsoft's historical failure to maintain a reliable interface, web or otherwise. (Not to say that GG is perfect.) Also, Microsoft's historical poor support of the interfaces that they provide. Even with the new Excel forums, I do not see any way to report problems to Microsoft. (But that might be my oversight. I just looked for the obvious "contact us" link on one web page.) I also raised concerns (along with compliments) about how that moderator process might work. This is based on two decades of experience with moderated NGs. Perhaps MVP Ron Coderre can offer some insight. Apparently he is the moderator (or one of them) of some of the new Excel forums. Lastly, my chief concern is that there will no longer be an alternative if/when posting problems arise with the new Excel forum. And I will no longer be able to troubleshoot and explain those problems, like deleted postings. You have personally benefitted from that just recently. Oh well, it's a done deal. I am not trying to complain. I am merely trying to set expectations. ----- original message ----- "T. Valko" wrote in message ... I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx I've started posting there. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Joe User" <joeu2004 wrote in message ... wrote: Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. Translation: Microsoft will force people to use the web interface that they have maintained so poorly for years and that is the least reliable and least feature-rich interface for these "forums" that I am aware of. Confirmation of that fact comes from the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx. In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The only potentially good thing to come out of this.... "Q: What should newsgroup users prepare for that will be different? [....] Additionally, Microsoft newsgroups are not moderated, while the forums will be." But the operative word is "potentially". First, Microsoft has demonstrated complete ineptitude in managing "forums". Their tools do not work. MS does not respond to problem reports. In fact, they do not even provide an effective way to report problems with "forums". Second, moderating a group is either highly labor-intensive or useless (just a pass-thru). But if the moderation is real (and effective), that will mean that postings will incur delays. Moreover, I have never heard of moderation done on a scale this large. Consider the traffic in the m.p.excel newsgroups alone. Well, perhaps Microsoft will depend on MVPs to be moderators. Oh well.... ----- original message ----- wrote in message ... Date 5/4/2010 Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. This decision is in response to worldwide market trends and evolving customer needs. Microsoft continues to invest in forums to reduce customer effort, consolidate community venues and make it easier for active contributors to retain their influence. Forums provide a healthy community environment with less spam and make answers easier to find by customers and search engines. Additionally, forums offer a better user and off-topic management platform that will improve customer satisfaction by facilitating discussions in a clean space. We understand that some newsgroups are still active, and important to the community. In the coming days and weeks, we will be rolling out tools and resources to minimize disruption to the community discussions. We are working diligently on providing additional resources and information in local languages later this week. In the meantime, please refer to the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx concerning this issue. The Microsoft Newsgroup website will be made available in additional languages in the next few days. |
#14
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"T. Valko" wrote:
I will never again reply to any of your posts and I will not acknowledge any of your replies to my posts. Talk about overreaction! Not sure if you are calling me a liar... What? Where are you getting all this negative crap? You wrote: "I have no idea if that link mentions the location". You wrote that in response to my comment which quotes exactly what that link mentions. So how can you have "no idea"? Ergo, your comment seems to dismiss or question the correction of my statement. I did suspect that you meant to write: "I have not looked at the link myself". But who am I to put words into your mouth? And even so, there is no reason for you not to take my word for it, since I provided a direct quote. (If I had not directly quoted from the link, it would have been reasonable for you not to take my word for it.) All I said was I didn't read the link you provided and here's a link that I'm aware of to the new Excel forums. And if you had expressed yourself exactly that way, I would have had no issue with it. ----- original message ----- "T. Valko" wrote in message ... Maybe you should be before you cast aspersions on someone else. What? Who's casting aspersions? Not sure if you are calling me a liar... What? Where are you getting all this negative crap? All I said was I didn't read the link you provided and here's a link that I'm aware of to the new Excel forums. You seem to fly off the handle quite easily and often for reasons that I don't understand. So, to eliminate any further misunderstanding of any comments I may make I will no longer interact with you. I will never again reply to any of your posts and I will not acknowledge any of your replies to my posts. Good grief! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Joe User" <joeu2004 wrote in message ... "T. Valko" wrote: I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx Maybe you should be before you cast aspersions on someone else. So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. Not sure if you are calling me a liar, or you think I am incapable of copy-and-pasting, or you simply cannot read. I quoted what that link mentions. I wrote: In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx Yes, that is another way to get the same new Excel forums, apparently. But the two top-level web sites are very different, at least in appearance. I cannot explain to you why Microsoft has two different ways to go to the same place. But that does not make you right and me wrong. It is not the first time that Microsoft has maintained two different ways to access the same forums. Jerry Lewis made me aware of two ways to access (some of) the "Discussion Groups": www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us, which I have always used, and http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...s/default.mspx, which Jerry was using recently. But in fact, the web site I used has a more complete list of Excel "Discussion Groups" than the web site that Jerry used. Caveat emptor. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! There is nothing inherently wrong with a web interface. Google Groups is a web interface, and I find it reasonably adequate. I was commenting on Microsoft's historical failure to maintain a reliable interface, web or otherwise. (Not to say that GG is perfect.) Also, Microsoft's historical poor support of the interfaces that they provide. Even with the new Excel forums, I do not see any way to report problems to Microsoft. (But that might be my oversight. I just looked for the obvious "contact us" link on one web page.) I also raised concerns (along with compliments) about how that moderator process might work. This is based on two decades of experience with moderated NGs. Perhaps MVP Ron Coderre can offer some insight. Apparently he is the moderator (or one of them) of some of the new Excel forums. Lastly, my chief concern is that there will no longer be an alternative if/when posting problems arise with the new Excel forum. And I will no longer be able to troubleshoot and explain those problems, like deleted postings. You have personally benefitted from that just recently. Oh well, it's a done deal. I am not trying to complain. I am merely trying to set expectations. ----- original message ----- "T. Valko" wrote in message ... I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx I've started posting there. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Joe User" <joeu2004 wrote in message ... wrote: Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. Translation: Microsoft will force people to use the web interface that they have maintained so poorly for years and that is the least reliable and least feature-rich interface for these "forums" that I am aware of. Confirmation of that fact comes from the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx. In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The only potentially good thing to come out of this.... "Q: What should newsgroup users prepare for that will be different? [....] Additionally, Microsoft newsgroups are not moderated, while the forums will be." But the operative word is "potentially". First, Microsoft has demonstrated complete ineptitude in managing "forums". Their tools do not work. MS does not respond to problem reports. In fact, they do not even provide an effective way to report problems with "forums". Second, moderating a group is either highly labor-intensive or useless (just a pass-thru). But if the moderation is real (and effective), that will mean that postings will incur delays. Moreover, I have never heard of moderation done on a scale this large. Consider the traffic in the m.p.excel newsgroups alone. Well, perhaps Microsoft will depend on MVPs to be moderators. Oh well.... ----- original message ----- wrote in message ... Date 5/4/2010 Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. This decision is in response to worldwide market trends and evolving customer needs. Microsoft continues to invest in forums to reduce customer effort, consolidate community venues and make it easier for active contributors to retain their influence. Forums provide a healthy community environment with less spam and make answers easier to find by customers and search engines. Additionally, forums offer a better user and off-topic management platform that will improve customer satisfaction by facilitating discussions in a clean space. We understand that some newsgroups are still active, and important to the community. In the coming days and weeks, we will be rolling out tools and resources to minimize disruption to the community discussions. We are working diligently on providing additional resources and information in local languages later this week. In the meantime, please refer to the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx concerning this issue. The Microsoft Newsgroup website will be made available in additional languages in the next few days. |
#15
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "T. Valko" wrote:
I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx I've started posting there. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! This is a backward step IMO. To me, newsgroups have everything that is good with nothing (well, OK, very little :) ) that is bad about the on line community. A short list of these would include: Quick and easy. Simple disply. Can get headers only and download just what you want to read. Properly threaded discussions. Access to hundreds/thousands of helpful knowlegeable people not only willing but eager to help. Text only (ie *not* web based). Many news readers available ... there's is bound to be something out there to suit everyone. Archived. Negatives ? Well, a few spammers and idiots ... but most news software has excellent filters, so that's taken care of. :) For myself, I will never use a browser to read news or "forums". It's too slow, too clunky and cumbersome, has bad to non existent threading, bad to no filters and is ugly, to name a few reasons. I guess there will be a few die hards <puts up hand that stick with MS news groups, for a while at least, and it is likely there will still be some traffic for a while with a few people willing and able to help ... but it sounds like MS is trying to kill off this helpful support line. Given it's free to them, I can't imagine why they think this is a good idea. |
#16
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I pretty much agree with everything you said.
The best feature of NNTP ngs from my perspective is that it's very easy to watch a thread for possible follow-ups. I also like the speed and ease of access. -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Bruce Sinclair" wrote in message ... In article , "T. Valko" wrote: I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx I've started posting there. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! This is a backward step IMO. To me, newsgroups have everything that is good with nothing (well, OK, very little :) ) that is bad about the on line community. A short list of these would include: Quick and easy. Simple disply. Can get headers only and download just what you want to read. Properly threaded discussions. Access to hundreds/thousands of helpful knowlegeable people not only willing but eager to help. Text only (ie *not* web based). Many news readers available ... there's is bound to be something out there to suit everyone. Archived. Negatives ? Well, a few spammers and idiots ... but most news software has excellent filters, so that's taken care of. :) For myself, I will never use a browser to read news or "forums". It's too slow, too clunky and cumbersome, has bad to non existent threading, bad to no filters and is ugly, to name a few reasons. I guess there will be a few die hards <puts up hand that stick with MS news groups, for a while at least, and it is likely there will still be some traffic for a while with a few people willing and able to help ... but it sounds like MS is trying to kill off this helpful support line. Given it's free to them, I can't imagine why they think this is a good idea. |
#17
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I agree with you and Bruce. However... the new Answers site could be a winner if it used the Ribbon. <g -- Jim Cone Portland, Oregon USA "T. Valko" wrote in message ... I pretty much agree with everything you said. The best feature of NNTP ngs from my perspective is that it's very easy to watch a thread for possible follow-ups. I also like the speed and ease of access. -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP |
#18
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What Biff said was, here's another link to the forums. I didn't sense
any negative tone to his post. I don't know why he reacted so strongly, but I don't know the history of your interactions. - Jon ------- Jon Peltier Peltier Technical Services, Inc. http://peltiertech.com/ On 5/5/2010 7:15 PM, Joe User wrote: "T. Valko" wrote: I will never again reply to any of your posts and I will not acknowledge any of your replies to my posts. Talk about overreaction! Not sure if you are calling me a liar... What? Where are you getting all this negative crap? You wrote: "I have no idea if that link mentions the location". You wrote that in response to my comment which quotes exactly what that link mentions. So how can you have "no idea"? Ergo, your comment seems to dismiss or question the correction of my statement. I did suspect that you meant to write: "I have not looked at the link myself". But who am I to put words into your mouth? And even so, there is no reason for you not to take my word for it, since I provided a direct quote. (If I had not directly quoted from the link, it would have been reasonable for you not to take my word for it.) All I said was I didn't read the link you provided and here's a link that I'm aware of to the new Excel forums. And if you had expressed yourself exactly that way, I would have had no issue with it. ----- original message ----- "T. Valko" wrote in message ... Maybe you should be before you cast aspersions on someone else. What? Who's casting aspersions? Not sure if you are calling me a liar... What? Where are you getting all this negative crap? All I said was I didn't read the link you provided and here's a link that I'm aware of to the new Excel forums. You seem to fly off the handle quite easily and often for reasons that I don't understand. So, to eliminate any further misunderstanding of any comments I may make I will no longer interact with you. I will never again reply to any of your posts and I will not acknowledge any of your replies to my posts. Good grief! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Joe User" <joeu2004 wrote in message ... "T. Valko" wrote: I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx Maybe you should be before you cast aspersions on someone else. So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. Not sure if you are calling me a liar, or you think I am incapable of copy-and-pasting, or you simply cannot read. I quoted what that link mentions. I wrote: In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx Yes, that is another way to get the same new Excel forums, apparently. But the two top-level web sites are very different, at least in appearance. I cannot explain to you why Microsoft has two different ways to go to the same place. But that does not make you right and me wrong. It is not the first time that Microsoft has maintained two different ways to access the same forums. Jerry Lewis made me aware of two ways to access (some of) the "Discussion Groups": www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us, which I have always used, and http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...s/default.mspx, which Jerry was using recently. But in fact, the web site I used has a more complete list of Excel "Discussion Groups" than the web site that Jerry used. Caveat emptor. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! There is nothing inherently wrong with a web interface. Google Groups is a web interface, and I find it reasonably adequate. I was commenting on Microsoft's historical failure to maintain a reliable interface, web or otherwise. (Not to say that GG is perfect.) Also, Microsoft's historical poor support of the interfaces that they provide. Even with the new Excel forums, I do not see any way to report problems to Microsoft. (But that might be my oversight. I just looked for the obvious "contact us" link on one web page.) I also raised concerns (along with compliments) about how that moderator process might work. This is based on two decades of experience with moderated NGs. Perhaps MVP Ron Coderre can offer some insight. Apparently he is the moderator (or one of them) of some of the new Excel forums. Lastly, my chief concern is that there will no longer be an alternative if/when posting problems arise with the new Excel forum. And I will no longer be able to troubleshoot and explain those problems, like deleted postings. You have personally benefitted from that just recently. Oh well, it's a done deal. I am not trying to complain. I am merely trying to set expectations. ----- original message ----- "T. Valko" wrote in message ... I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx I've started posting there. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Joe User" <joeu2004 wrote in message ... wrote: Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. Translation: Microsoft will force people to use the web interface that they have maintained so poorly for years and that is the least reliable and least feature-rich interface for these "forums" that I am aware of. Confirmation of that fact comes from the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx. In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The only potentially good thing to come out of this.... "Q: What should newsgroup users prepare for that will be different? [....] Additionally, Microsoft newsgroups are not moderated, while the forums will be." But the operative word is "potentially". First, Microsoft has demonstrated complete ineptitude in managing "forums". Their tools do not work. MS does not respond to problem reports. In fact, they do not even provide an effective way to report problems with "forums". Second, moderating a group is either highly labor-intensive or useless (just a pass-thru). But if the moderation is real (and effective), that will mean that postings will incur delays. Moreover, I have never heard of moderation done on a scale this large. Consider the traffic in the m.p.excel newsgroups alone. Well, perhaps Microsoft will depend on MVPs to be moderators. Oh well.... ----- original message ----- wrote in message ... Date 5/4/2010 Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. This decision is in response to worldwide market trends and evolving customer needs. Microsoft continues to invest in forums to reduce customer effort, consolidate community venues and make it easier for active contributors to retain their influence. Forums provide a healthy community environment with less spam and make answers easier to find by customers and search engines. Additionally, forums offer a better user and off-topic management platform that will improve customer satisfaction by facilitating discussions in a clean space. We understand that some newsgroups are still active, and important to the community. In the coming days and weeks, we will be rolling out tools and resources to minimize disruption to the community discussions. We are working diligently on providing additional resources and information in local languages later this week. In the meantime, please refer to the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx concerning this issue. The Microsoft Newsgroup website will be made available in additional languages in the next few days. |
#19
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are two problems with NNTP, from Microsoft's viewpoint:
1. It's old and unshiny. 2. It was not invented in Redmond. - Jon ------- Jon Peltier Peltier Technical Services, Inc. http://peltiertech.com/ On 5/5/2010 7:26 PM, Bruce Sinclair wrote: In , "T. wrote: I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx I've started posting there. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! This is a backward step IMO. To me, newsgroups have everything that is good with nothing (well, OK, very little :) ) that is bad about the on line community. A short list of these would include: Quick and easy. Simple disply. Can get headers only and download just what you want to read. Properly threaded discussions. Access to hundreds/thousands of helpful knowlegeable people not only willing but eager to help. Text only (ie *not* web based). Many news readers available ... there's is bound to be something out there to suit everyone. Archived. Negatives ? Well, a few spammers and idiots ... but most news software has excellent filters, so that's taken care of. :) For myself, I will never use a browser to read news or "forums". It's too slow, too clunky and cumbersome, has bad to non existent threading, bad to no filters and is ugly, to name a few reasons. I guess there will be a few die hards<puts up hand that stick with MS news groups, for a while at least, and it is likely there will still be some traffic for a while with a few people willing and able to help ... but it sounds like MS is trying to kill off this helpful support line. Given it's free to them, I can't imagine why they think this is a good idea. |
#20
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jon Peltier" wrote in message ... There are two problems with NNTP, from Microsoft's viewpoint: 1. It's old and unshiny. 2. It was not invented in Redmond. 3. They are not able to control it - now they decide what is THE right answer 4. It doesn't have the highly desirable points (now what can they possibly be for) |
#21
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Cone" wrote in message ... I agree with you and Bruce. However... the new Answers site could be a winner if it used the Ribbon. <g By gosh, I think he's got it! |
#22
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Joe User" <joeu2004 wrote in message news:%
"T. Valko" wrote: I will never again reply to any of your posts and I will not acknowledge any of your replies to my posts. Talk about overreaction! I didn't think it was overreaction. You seem to have some worthwhile contributions to make yet sometimes you end up antagonizing people with no apparent reason. I once went out of my way to help you and spent quite a lot of time in so doing. Maybe in the end it wasn't helpful, your response back was the only rude reply I have ever had in these newsgroups. Perhaps it's just a way you have! Regards, Peter T |
#24
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter T" <peter_t@discussions wrote in message ... Maybe in the end it wasn't helpful, your response back was the only rude reply I have ever had in these newsgroups. Perhaps it's just a way you have! Blimey, you have led a sheltered life <g |
#25
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is a shame Ron, I have enjoyed your contributions. But MS don't care,
there will always be hundreds stepping up even if they aren't up to your capabilities, and they have shown a blind indifference to those more capable users amongst us. Bob "Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message ... On Wed, 05 May 2010 23:26:01 GMT, z (Bruce Sinclair) wrote: In article , "T. Valko" wrote: I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx I've started posting there. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! This is a backward step IMO. To me, newsgroups have everything that is good with nothing (well, OK, very little :) ) that is bad about the on line community. A short list of these would include: Quick and easy. Simple disply. Can get headers only and download just what you want to read. Properly threaded discussions. Access to hundreds/thousands of helpful knowlegeable people not only willing but eager to help. Text only (ie *not* web based). Many news readers available ... there's is bound to be something out there to suit everyone. Archived. Negatives ? Well, a few spammers and idiots ... but most news software has excellent filters, so that's taken care of. :) For myself, I will never use a browser to read news or "forums". It's too slow, too clunky and cumbersome, has bad to non existent threading, bad to no filters and is ugly, to name a few reasons. I guess there will be a few die hards <puts up hand that stick with MS news groups, for a while at least, and it is likely there will still be some traffic for a while with a few people willing and able to help ... but it sounds like MS is trying to kill off this helpful support line. Given it's free to them, I can't imagine why they think this is a good idea. As just a user and occasional contributor, I concur with Bruce's analysis. I went and tried the web interface last night (as I have for other forums in the past), and found it much more difficult to use than the newsgroups. It crashed a few times (page not accessible errors). I have better things to do with my time, so when these newsgroups stop functioning, I will cut down my participation significantly. --ron |
#26
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 6 May 2010 12:34:41 +0100, "Bob Phillips"
wrote: That is a shame Ron, I have enjoyed your contributions. But MS don't care, there will always be hundreds stepping up even if they aren't up to your capabilities, and they have shown a blind indifference to those more capable users amongst us. Bob I will lose, also, by not participating. I did notice something called an NNTP Bridge. I haven't tried that access method yet. Maybe it'll be better than the Web UI. --ron |
#27
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Joe
I didn't sense any negative tone to Biff's post. He posted the same message at the same time on the other groups, I don't think it had anything to do with your message, I think you reacted very strongly for nothing, It's a shame. That's my opinion. John "Joe User" <joeu2004 wrote in message ... "T. Valko" wrote: I will never again reply to any of your posts and I will not acknowledge any of your replies to my posts. Talk about overreaction! Not sure if you are calling me a liar... What? Where are you getting all this negative crap? You wrote: "I have no idea if that link mentions the location". You wrote that in response to my comment which quotes exactly what that link mentions. So how can you have "no idea"? Ergo, your comment seems to dismiss or question the correction of my statement. I did suspect that you meant to write: "I have not looked at the link myself". But who am I to put words into your mouth? And even so, there is no reason for you not to take my word for it, since I provided a direct quote. (If I had not directly quoted from the link, it would have been reasonable for you not to take my word for it.) All I said was I didn't read the link you provided and here's a link that I'm aware of to the new Excel forums. And if you had expressed yourself exactly that way, I would have had no issue with it. ----- original message ----- "T. Valko" wrote in message ... Maybe you should be before you cast aspersions on someone else. What? Who's casting aspersions? Not sure if you are calling me a liar... What? Where are you getting all this negative crap? All I said was I didn't read the link you provided and here's a link that I'm aware of to the new Excel forums. You seem to fly off the handle quite easily and often for reasons that I don't understand. So, to eliminate any further misunderstanding of any comments I may make I will no longer interact with you. I will never again reply to any of your posts and I will not acknowledge any of your replies to my posts. Good grief! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Joe User" <joeu2004 wrote in message ... "T. Valko" wrote: I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx Maybe you should be before you cast aspersions on someone else. So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. Not sure if you are calling me a liar, or you think I am incapable of copy-and-pasting, or you simply cannot read. I quoted what that link mentions. I wrote: In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx Yes, that is another way to get the same new Excel forums, apparently. But the two top-level web sites are very different, at least in appearance. I cannot explain to you why Microsoft has two different ways to go to the same place. But that does not make you right and me wrong. It is not the first time that Microsoft has maintained two different ways to access the same forums. Jerry Lewis made me aware of two ways to access (some of) the "Discussion Groups": www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us, which I have always used, and http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...s/default.mspx, which Jerry was using recently. But in fact, the web site I used has a more complete list of Excel "Discussion Groups" than the web site that Jerry used. Caveat emptor. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! There is nothing inherently wrong with a web interface. Google Groups is a web interface, and I find it reasonably adequate. I was commenting on Microsoft's historical failure to maintain a reliable interface, web or otherwise. (Not to say that GG is perfect.) Also, Microsoft's historical poor support of the interfaces that they provide. Even with the new Excel forums, I do not see any way to report problems to Microsoft. (But that might be my oversight. I just looked for the obvious "contact us" link on one web page.) I also raised concerns (along with compliments) about how that moderator process might work. This is based on two decades of experience with moderated NGs. Perhaps MVP Ron Coderre can offer some insight. Apparently he is the moderator (or one of them) of some of the new Excel forums. Lastly, my chief concern is that there will no longer be an alternative if/when posting problems arise with the new Excel forum. And I will no longer be able to troubleshoot and explain those problems, like deleted postings. You have personally benefitted from that just recently. Oh well, it's a done deal. I am not trying to complain. I am merely trying to set expectations. ----- original message ----- "T. Valko" wrote in message ... I didn't go to this link to read about the replacement forum: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx So I have no idea if that link mentions the location of the new forums. The new Excel forums are located at: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/default.aspx I've started posting there. The UI is completely different but it's still a web based forum! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Joe User" <joeu2004 wrote in message ... wrote: Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. Translation: Microsoft will force people to use the web interface that they have maintained so poorly for years and that is the least reliable and least feature-rich interface for these "forums" that I am aware of. Confirmation of that fact comes from the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx. In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The only potentially good thing to come out of this.... "Q: What should newsgroup users prepare for that will be different? [....] Additionally, Microsoft newsgroups are not moderated, while the forums will be." But the operative word is "potentially". First, Microsoft has demonstrated complete ineptitude in managing "forums". Their tools do not work. MS does not respond to problem reports. In fact, they do not even provide an effective way to report problems with "forums". Second, moderating a group is either highly labor-intensive or useless (just a pass-thru). But if the moderation is real (and effective), that will mean that postings will incur delays. Moreover, I have never heard of moderation done on a scale this large. Consider the traffic in the m.p.excel newsgroups alone. Well, perhaps Microsoft will depend on MVPs to be moderators. Oh well.... ----- original message ----- wrote in message ... Date 5/4/2010 Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. This decision is in response to worldwide market trends and evolving customer needs. Microsoft continues to invest in forums to reduce customer effort, consolidate community venues and make it easier for active contributors to retain their influence. Forums provide a healthy community environment with less spam and make answers easier to find by customers and search engines. Additionally, forums offer a better user and off-topic management platform that will improve customer satisfaction by facilitating discussions in a clean space. We understand that some newsgroups are still active, and important to the community. In the coming days and weeks, we will be rolling out tools and resources to minimize disruption to the community discussions. We are working diligently on providing additional resources and information in local languages later this week. In the meantime, please refer to the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx concerning this issue. The Microsoft Newsgroup website will be made available in additional languages in the next few days. |
#28
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have tried it, it is a tad slow, and you still have the odd groupings in
Answers. -- HTH Bob "Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message ... On Thu, 6 May 2010 12:34:41 +0100, "Bob Phillips" wrote: That is a shame Ron, I have enjoyed your contributions. But MS don't care, there will always be hundreds stepping up even if they aren't up to your capabilities, and they have shown a blind indifference to those more capable users amongst us. Bob I will lose, also, by not participating. I did notice something called an NNTP Bridge. I haven't tried that access method yet. Maybe it'll be better than the Web UI. --ron |
#29
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Phillips" wrote in message ... "Jon Peltier" wrote in message ... There are two problems with NNTP, from Microsoft's viewpoint: 1. It's old and unshiny. 2. It was not invented in Redmond. 3. They are not able to control it - now they decide what is THE right answer 4. It doesn't have the highly desirable points (now what can they possibly be for) Three is the key. I think we will get steamrollered. SG |
#30
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob Phillips" wrote in message
... "Peter T" <peter_t@discussions wrote in message ... Maybe in the end it wasn't helpful, your response back was the only rude reply I have ever had in these newsgroups. Perhaps it's just a way you have! Blimey, you have led a sheltered life <g LOL! I expect you've probably been rude to me but that doesn't count <g Peter |
#31
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter T" <peter_t@discussions wrote in message ... "Bob Phillips" wrote in message ... "Peter T" <peter_t@discussions wrote in message ... Maybe in the end it wasn't helpful, your response back was the only rude reply I have ever had in these newsgroups. Perhaps it's just a way you have! Blimey, you have led a sheltered life <g LOL! I expect you've probably been rude to me but that doesn't count <g That's what everyone says. |
#32
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok I have tried it. For all of the negative feedback I don't mind it. Could
it be better... Absolutely. But compared to some other on line forums and the like it is darn good. And heck I even get to have a really cool avatar. As for points they are par for the course on so many of these sites. I am with Bob that they are kind of useless. Perhaps I am just bitter since I just got my gold star in the general questions forum and now they are wiping that out. Now how is everyone supposed to be impressed. Things I like... You can edit the post you made. I can not count the number of times that I had to back track a posting for a typo or just palin silly mistake. Now I can look smarter by fixing the mistakes... First pet peave is the use of screen space. There is a lot of wasted space. I would prefer to seem more content and less junk / blank space. -- HTH... Jim Thomlinson "Bob Phillips" wrote: I have tried it, it is a tad slow, and you still have the odd groupings in Answers. -- HTH Bob "Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message ... On Thu, 6 May 2010 12:34:41 +0100, "Bob Phillips" wrote: That is a shame Ron, I have enjoyed your contributions. But MS don't care, there will always be hundreds stepping up even if they aren't up to your capabilities, and they have shown a blind indifference to those more capable users amongst us. Bob I will lose, also, by not participating. I did notice something called an NNTP Bridge. I haven't tried that access method yet. Maybe it'll be better than the Web UI. --ron . |
#33
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 6 May 2010 11:45:01 -0700, Jim Thomlinson
wrote: Ok I have tried it. For all of the negative feedback I don't mind it. Could it be better... Absolutely. But compared to some other on line forums and the like it is darn good. And heck I even get to have a really cool avatar. As for points they are par for the course on so many of these sites. I am with Bob that they are kind of useless. Perhaps I am just bitter since I just got my gold star in the general questions forum and now they are wiping that out. Now how is everyone supposed to be impressed. Things I like... You can edit the post you made. I can not count the number of times that I had to back track a posting for a typo or just palin silly mistake. Now I can look smarter by fixing the mistakes... First pet peave is the use of screen space. There is a lot of wasted space. I would prefer to seem more content and less junk / blank space. -- HTH... Jim Thomlinson Jim, Are you referring to the NNTP Bridge? Or the Web UI? Thanks. --ron |
#34
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you referring to the NNTP Bridge? Or the Web UI?
Sounds like the web UI. -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message ... On Thu, 6 May 2010 11:45:01 -0700, Jim Thomlinson wrote: Ok I have tried it. For all of the negative feedback I don't mind it. Could it be better... Absolutely. But compared to some other on line forums and the like it is darn good. And heck I even get to have a really cool avatar. As for points they are par for the course on so many of these sites. I am with Bob that they are kind of useless. Perhaps I am just bitter since I just got my gold star in the general questions forum and now they are wiping that out. Now how is everyone supposed to be impressed. Things I like... You can edit the post you made. I can not count the number of times that I had to back track a posting for a typo or just palin silly mistake. Now I can look smarter by fixing the mistakes... First pet peave is the use of screen space. There is a lot of wasted space. I would prefer to seem more content and less junk / blank space. -- HTH... Jim Thomlinson Jim, Are you referring to the NNTP Bridge? Or the Web UI? Thanks. --ron |
#35
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 6 May 2010 18:22:26 -0400, "T. Valko" wrote:
Are you referring to the NNTP Bridge? Or the Web UI? Sounds like the web UI. -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP Well, I tried the Web UI again and, compared to my Forte Agent newsreader, I find it cumbersome and more time consuming. I have to do a lot more scrolling in order to follow a thread -- it seems that it will be a less efficient (more time-consuming) method of interacting on these forums. --ron |
#36
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Avatar - wow I never joined the community so as to have a cool avatar!
Points - I think it is insidious for two reasons, first you get people points chasing (just look at Experts Exchange), and secondly I fully expect MS to use those points as some time in the future. And what did obtaining a gold start give you? Edit posts - that is a double edged sword, as often a poster will read your mistaken post before you correct it and may be confused/distracted by it. You can easily follow-up with a correction, as you can/do in the NGs, but if you do edit I feel it would be better to leave the original mistake and then add the correction, it will avoid any chance of confusion. Screen space - filling the screen with junk, sound like the current MS philosophy to me generally (style gallery in the ribbon!). -- HTH Bob "Jim Thomlinson" wrote in message ... Ok I have tried it. For all of the negative feedback I don't mind it. Could it be better... Absolutely. But compared to some other on line forums and the like it is darn good. And heck I even get to have a really cool avatar. As for points they are par for the course on so many of these sites. I am with Bob that they are kind of useless. Perhaps I am just bitter since I just got my gold star in the general questions forum and now they are wiping that out. Now how is everyone supposed to be impressed. Things I like... You can edit the post you made. I can not count the number of times that I had to back track a posting for a typo or just palin silly mistake. Now I can look smarter by fixing the mistakes... First pet peave is the use of screen space. There is a lot of wasted space. I would prefer to seem more content and less junk / blank space. -- HTH... Jim Thomlinson "Bob Phillips" wrote: I have tried it, it is a tad slow, and you still have the odd groupings in Answers. -- HTH Bob "Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message ... On Thu, 6 May 2010 12:34:41 +0100, "Bob Phillips" wrote: That is a shame Ron, I have enjoyed your contributions. But MS don't care, there will always be hundreds stepping up even if they aren't up to your capabilities, and they have shown a blind indifference to those more capable users amongst us. Bob I will lose, also, by not participating. I did notice something called an NNTP Bridge. I haven't tried that access method yet. Maybe it'll be better than the Web UI. --ron . |
#37
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes it is the web UI
I agree that the edit thing could allow users to go back and correct posts to appear as if they had the correct answer all along. I like it because by typing is terrible. I have been know to post code with typos and then have to go back in a new post to correct the typo. The avatar thing was done tongue in cheek. I am just waiting for someone to use an 'inappropriate' avatar to see what happens. MS is not the only company filling their screens with useless junk. We have software here at work that fills the screen with pretty junk and there is no way to remove it. Note to software vendors... form should follow function. Finally the gold star. I don't really care. I don't chase points. I see so many posters soliciting points and I am with you... why? Perhaps to impress others but there are individuals around here with medals that don't hold a candle to others without medals. I like seeing others biographies and backgrounds which is why you end up seeing my medals. No way to have one without the other. My parting word are go to the newsgroup with an open mind. It is certainly different from the current environment. Some good and some bad. Try not to make up your mind before you have given it a fair chance. XL2007 also takes a lot to get used to. It is slow and cumbersome at first. You really need to give it a chance. -- HTH... Jim Thomlinson "Bob Phillips" wrote: Avatar - wow I never joined the community so as to have a cool avatar! Points - I think it is insidious for two reasons, first you get people points chasing (just look at Experts Exchange), and secondly I fully expect MS to use those points as some time in the future. And what did obtaining a gold start give you? Edit posts - that is a double edged sword, as often a poster will read your mistaken post before you correct it and may be confused/distracted by it. You can easily follow-up with a correction, as you can/do in the NGs, but if you do edit I feel it would be better to leave the original mistake and then add the correction, it will avoid any chance of confusion. Screen space - filling the screen with junk, sound like the current MS philosophy to me generally (style gallery in the ribbon!). -- HTH Bob "Jim Thomlinson" wrote in message ... Ok I have tried it. For all of the negative feedback I don't mind it. Could it be better... Absolutely. But compared to some other on line forums and the like it is darn good. And heck I even get to have a really cool avatar. As for points they are par for the course on so many of these sites. I am with Bob that they are kind of useless. Perhaps I am just bitter since I just got my gold star in the general questions forum and now they are wiping that out. Now how is everyone supposed to be impressed. Things I like... You can edit the post you made. I can not count the number of times that I had to back track a posting for a typo or just palin silly mistake. Now I can look smarter by fixing the mistakes... First pet peave is the use of screen space. There is a lot of wasted space. I would prefer to seem more content and less junk / blank space. -- HTH... Jim Thomlinson "Bob Phillips" wrote: I have tried it, it is a tad slow, and you still have the odd groupings in Answers. -- HTH Bob "Ron Rosenfeld" wrote in message ... On Thu, 6 May 2010 12:34:41 +0100, "Bob Phillips" wrote: That is a shame Ron, I have enjoyed your contributions. But MS don't care, there will always be hundreds stepping up even if they aren't up to your capabilities, and they have shown a blind indifference to those more capable users amongst us. Bob I will lose, also, by not participating. I did notice something called an NNTP Bridge. I haven't tried that access method yet. Maybe it'll be better than the Web UI. --ron . . |
#38
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming,microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So what should an OP do if they want to post a question about
Programming?......just post it anywhere and let MS sort it out? as in...... "Select the Best Forum Select the forum that most closely matches your topic. (Don't worry, if it's not the right one we'll move it for you.) " Does this mean MS will read EVERY post and place it where they think it should be, rather than where the OP posted it and will go to see if there are any replies. And don't forget, the "Notify me" feature has not worked for some time. I started using Excel several years ago, and have progressed to be the GOTO guy for Excel problems at the company I work for (over 1000 computers). I have responded to thousands of posts in the Excel Newsgroups, earned a Master MOUS certification on the side, and learned virtually everything I know by coming to the various Newsgroups, especially the Excel Programming Group. I have taught many others how to be better in excel and have written many many Application Programs in Excel for my Users. Virtually all of that use of Excel, by those dozens of folks, being a direct decendant of MY time on the Newsgroups. So not only did the Newsgroups help ME learn, that knowledge also rolled down hill to help many others. I am sad to see the loss of my source of learning, and my opportunity to assist others fade away. I agree with Jim Thomlinson who says...... I like the way the news group works. It is simple and intuitive. The only issues I have so far is that I don't want to lose the body of work that exists in these forums. I often find myself searching for posts that I read long ago Vaya con Dios, Chuck, CABGx3 "Jim Thomlinson" wrote in message ... To expand on what I said... I like the way the news group works. It is simple and intuitive. The only issues I have so far is that I don't want to lose the body of work that exists in these forums. I often find myself searching for posts that I read long ago. Secondly I am not sure that I like the new categories for XL. Noteably the programming forum is gone. That being said the current categories are not perfect either. -- HTH... Jim Thomlinson "Jim Thomlinson" wrote: I think I will try the new forum before I express an opinion on whether it is better or worse. Just my 2 cents. -- HTH... Jim Thomlinson "Joe User" wrote: wrote: Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. Translation: Microsoft will force people to use the web interface that they have maintained so poorly for years and that is the least reliable and least feature-rich interface for these "forums" that I am aware of. Confirmation of that fact comes from the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx. In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The only potentially good thing to come out of this.... "Q: What should newsgroup users prepare for that will be different? [....] Additionally, Microsoft newsgroups are not moderated, while the forums will be." But the operative word is "potentially". First, Microsoft has demonstrated complete ineptitude in managing "forums". Their tools do not work. MS does not respond to problem reports. In fact, they do not even provide an effective way to report problems with "forums". Second, moderating a group is either highly labor-intensive or useless (just a pass-thru). But if the moderation is real (and effective), that will mean that postings will incur delays. Moreover, I have never heard of moderation done on a scale this large. Consider the traffic in the m.p.excel newsgroups alone. Well, perhaps Microsoft will depend on MVPs to be moderators. Oh well.... ----- original message ----- wrote in message ... Date 5/4/2010 Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. This decision is in response to worldwide market trends and evolving customer needs. Microsoft continues to invest in forums to reduce customer effort, consolidate community venues and make it easier for active contributors to retain their influence. Forums provide a healthy community environment with less spam and make answers easier to find by customers and search engines. Additionally, forums offer a better user and off-topic management platform that will improve customer satisfaction by facilitating discussions in a clean space. We understand that some newsgroups are still active, and important to the community. In the coming days and weeks, we will be rolling out tools and resources to minimize disruption to the community discussions. We are working diligently on providing additional resources and information in local languages later this week. In the meantime, please refer to the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx concerning this issue. The Microsoft Newsgroup website will be made available in additional languages in the next few days. . |
#39
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc,microsoft.public.excel.programming,microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions,microsoft.public.excel
|
|||
|
|||
![]() My opinion is that it is the precursor to abandoning VBA. We can look forward to the release of VSTO.Not ("VerySlowToOperate.Not") to handle all Office programming needs. It will require the $499.00 Office upgrade and a 64 core 16 GHZ processor and Net.Framework 2.234 thru 19.432 installed on your machine. (The 1500 page manual sold separately). The upside is that it will be almost as fast as VBA. Happy Trails. -- Jim Cone Portland, Oregon USA "CLR" wrote in message ... So what should an OP do if they want to post a question about Programming?......just post it anywhere and let MS sort it out? as in...... "Select the Best Forum Select the forum that most closely matches your topic. (Don't worry, if it's not the right one we'll move it for you.) " Does this mean MS will read EVERY post and place it where they think it should be, rather than where the OP posted it and will go to see if there are any replies. And don't forget, the "Notify me" feature has not worked for some time. I started using Excel several years ago, and have progressed to be the GOTO guy for Excel problems at the company I work for (over 1000 computers). I have responded to thousands of posts in the Excel Newsgroups, earned a Master MOUS certification on the side, and learned virtually everything I know by coming to the various Newsgroups, especially the Excel Programming Group. I have taught many others how to be better in excel and have written many many Application Programs in Excel for my Users. Virtually all of that use of Excel, by those dozens of folks, being a direct decendant of MY time on the Newsgroups. So not only did the Newsgroups help ME learn, that knowledge also rolled down hill to help many others. I am sad to see the loss of my source of learning, and my opportunity to assist others fade away. I agree with Jim Thomlinson who says...... I like the way the news group works. It is simple and intuitive. The only issues I have so far is that I don't want to lose the body of work that exists in these forums. I often find myself searching for posts that I read long ago Vaya con Dios, Chuck, CABGx3 "Jim Thomlinson" wrote in message ... To expand on what I said... I like the way the news group works. It is simple and intuitive. The only issues I have so far is that I don't want to lose the body of work that exists in these forums. I often find myself searching for posts that I read long ago. Secondly I am not sure that I like the new categories for XL. Noteably the programming forum is gone. That being said the current categories are not perfect either. -- HTH... Jim Thomlinson "Jim Thomlinson" wrote: I think I will try the new forum before I express an opinion on whether it is better or worse. Just my 2 cents. -- HTH... Jim Thomlinson "Joe User" wrote: wrote: Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. Translation: Microsoft will force people to use the web interface that they have maintained so poorly for years and that is the least reliable and least feature-rich interface for these "forums" that I am aware of. Confirmation of that fact comes from the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx. In the Q&A the "Q: Where can I access these forums from? http://www.microsoft.com/communities/forums/default.mspx" The only potentially good thing to come out of this.... "Q: What should newsgroup users prepare for that will be different? [....] Additionally, Microsoft newsgroups are not moderated, while the forums will be." But the operative word is "potentially". First, Microsoft has demonstrated complete ineptitude in managing "forums". Their tools do not work. MS does not respond to problem reports. In fact, they do not even provide an effective way to report problems with "forums". Second, moderating a group is either highly labor-intensive or useless (just a pass-thru). But if the moderation is real (and effective), that will mean that postings will incur delays. Moreover, I have never heard of moderation done on a scale this large. Consider the traffic in the m.p.excel newsgroups alone. Well, perhaps Microsoft will depend on MVPs to be moderators. Oh well.... ----- original message ----- wrote in message ... Date 5/4/2010 Starting in early summer 2010, Microsoft will begin progressively closing down the Microsoft public newsgroups to enrich conversations in the rapidly-growing forum platform. This decision is in response to worldwide market trends and evolving customer needs. Microsoft continues to invest in forums to reduce customer effort, consolidate community venues and make it easier for active contributors to retain their influence. Forums provide a healthy community environment with less spam and make answers easier to find by customers and search engines. Additionally, forums offer a better user and off-topic management platform that will improve customer satisfaction by facilitating discussions in a clean space. We understand that some newsgroups are still active, and important to the community. In the coming days and weeks, we will be rolling out tools and resources to minimize disruption to the community discussions. We are working diligently on providing additional resources and information in local languages later this week. In the meantime, please refer to the official Microsoft Newsgroup website http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.mspx concerning this issue. The Microsoft Newsgroup website will be made available in additional languages in the next few days. . |
#40
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thu, 06 May 2010 06:44:24 -0400 from Ron Rosenfeld
: I have better things to do with my time, so when these newsgroups stop functioning, I will cut down my participation significantly. Why do you think these newsgroups will stop functioning? It's in the nature of Usenet that a newsgroup, once created, has a life of its own. Sure, Microsoft won't be driving new traffic here, but that doesn't stop the rest of us from continuing to read and post. -- Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA http://OakRoadSystems.com Shikata ga nai... |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
microsoft communities interface | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
How do I get the microsoft office online taskpane excel to work? | New Users to Excel | |||
How do I download readable templates from microsoft online | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |