Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You don't use Option Explicit all the time?
You know you can set that in ToolsOptionsEditor tab, Require Variable Declaration checkbox. -- HTH RP (remove nothere from the email address if mailing direct) "ben" (remove this if mailing direct) wrote in message ... nevermind, stupid me, the worst of all errors, syntax was incorrect for one variable. sigh. I really need finish changing this project to option explicit, thanks all "ben" wrote: hmmm ok it compliles ok runs ok but it just doesn't mail anything................ "Fredrik Wahlgren" wrote: "Bob Phillips" wrote in message ... You are referring to late binding, which doesn't bind to the application type library at development/compile time, but makes multiple calls at runtime. Essentially, rather than setting a reference to the type library via ToolsReferences, and then declaring an object of type Outlook.Application or whatever, you create a generic Object variable and create that object rather than just New. You lose access to the application's object model and intellisens when you do this, but there is another way, what I call Develop Early, Release Late. An example is given (using Outlook) at http://www.xldynamic.com/source/xld.EarlyLate.html -- Develop Early, Release Late ? That sounds like something I want to remember. Nice! /Fredrik |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Reference Libraries and Add-Ins | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Importing libraries | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Porting VBA Libraries | Excel Programming | |||
Urgent!!! -- Reference libraries | Excel Programming | |||
Object libraries | Excel Programming |