Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
ben ben is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 232
Default Reference Libraries

I use excel to control mailing of workbooks automatically using outlook. So
in my excel file I have the Outlook 11.0 reference file added in which is
associated with Outlook 2003, Unfortunately I have people using Outlook 2000
also which is using Outlook 9.0 reference library. When the excel workbook is
run a machine with outlook 2000 every macro errors because the reference to
the Outlook 11.0 library is not found. Is there a way to include backwards
compabtibilty here???????
Please help....
ben
--
When you lose your mind, you free your life.
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 339
Default Reference Libraries


"ben" (remove this if mailing direct) wrote in message
...
I use excel to control mailing of workbooks automatically using outlook.

So
in my excel file I have the Outlook 11.0 reference file added in which

is
associated with Outlook 2003, Unfortunately I have people using Outlook

2000
also which is using Outlook 9.0 reference library. When the excel workbook

is
run a machine with outlook 2000 every macro errors because the reference

to
the Outlook 11.0 library is not found. Is there a way to include backwards
compabtibilty here???????
Please help....
ben
--
When you lose your mind, you free your life.


I think so. When you have a reference set, you use what is known as early
binding, Thismeans that you can declare a varible to that object as Dim o As
Outlook.Application without VBA making a complaint. VBA can now make use of
Intellisense to show all the methods offered by Outlook.

I think you should be able to use late binding. This means that you remove
the reference to outlook and then have code similar to this

Dim o As Object
Set o = CreateObject("Outlook.Application")

You won't have Intellisense but the code should now work with either version
as long as you don't try to call a method that exists in one version only.
To make coding easier, do this change as the last step.

/Fredrik


  #3   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,272
Default Reference Libraries

You are referring to late binding, which doesn't bind to the application
type library at development/compile time, but makes multiple calls at
runtime.

Essentially, rather than setting a reference to the type library via
ToolsReferences, and then declaring an object of type Outlook.Application
or whatever, you create a generic Object variable and create that object
rather than just New.

You lose access to the application's object model and intellisens when you
do this, but there is another way, what I call Develop Early, Release Late.
An example is given (using Outlook) at
http://www.xldynamic.com/source/xld.EarlyLate.html

--

HTH

RP
(remove nothere from the email address if mailing direct)


"ben" (remove this if mailing direct) wrote in message
...
I use excel to control mailing of workbooks automatically using outlook.

So
in my excel file I have the Outlook 11.0 reference file added in which

is
associated with Outlook 2003, Unfortunately I have people using Outlook

2000
also which is using Outlook 9.0 reference library. When the excel workbook

is
run a machine with outlook 2000 every macro errors because the reference

to
the Outlook 11.0 library is not found. Is there a way to include backwards
compabtibilty here???????
Please help....
ben
--
When you lose your mind, you free your life.



  #4   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 339
Default Reference Libraries


"Bob Phillips" wrote in message
...
You are referring to late binding, which doesn't bind to the application
type library at development/compile time, but makes multiple calls at
runtime.

Essentially, rather than setting a reference to the type library via
ToolsReferences, and then declaring an object of type Outlook.Application
or whatever, you create a generic Object variable and create that object
rather than just New.

You lose access to the application's object model and intellisens when you
do this, but there is another way, what I call Develop Early, Release

Late.
An example is given (using Outlook) at
http://www.xldynamic.com/source/xld.EarlyLate.html

--


Develop Early, Release Late ? That sounds like something I want to
remember. Nice!

/Fredrik


  #5   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
ben ben is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 232
Default Reference Libraries

thanks
I understood about late binding but i did not think about dim and setting
the objects differently
much appreciation.

"Bob Phillips" wrote:

You are referring to late binding, which doesn't bind to the application
type library at development/compile time, but makes multiple calls at
runtime.

Essentially, rather than setting a reference to the type library via
ToolsReferences, and then declaring an object of type Outlook.Application
or whatever, you create a generic Object variable and create that object
rather than just New.

You lose access to the application's object model and intellisens when you
do this, but there is another way, what I call Develop Early, Release Late.
An example is given (using Outlook) at
http://www.xldynamic.com/source/xld.EarlyLate.html

--

HTH

RP
(remove nothere from the email address if mailing direct)


"ben" (remove this if mailing direct) wrote in message
...
I use excel to control mailing of workbooks automatically using outlook.

So
in my excel file I have the Outlook 11.0 reference file added in which

is
associated with Outlook 2003, Unfortunately I have people using Outlook

2000
also which is using Outlook 9.0 reference library. When the excel workbook

is
run a machine with outlook 2000 every macro errors because the reference

to
the Outlook 11.0 library is not found. Is there a way to include backwards
compabtibilty here???????
Please help....
ben
--
When you lose your mind, you free your life.






  #6   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,272
Default Reference Libraries


"Fredrik Wahlgren" wrote in message
...

Develop Early, Release Late ? That sounds like something I want to
remember. Nice!


Thanks. I thought it was a good catchy phrase.


  #7   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
ben ben is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 232
Default Reference Libraries

hmmm ok it compliles ok runs ok but it just doesn't mail
anything................

"Fredrik Wahlgren" wrote:


"Bob Phillips" wrote in message
...
You are referring to late binding, which doesn't bind to the application
type library at development/compile time, but makes multiple calls at
runtime.

Essentially, rather than setting a reference to the type library via
ToolsReferences, and then declaring an object of type Outlook.Application
or whatever, you create a generic Object variable and create that object
rather than just New.

You lose access to the application's object model and intellisens when you
do this, but there is another way, what I call Develop Early, Release

Late.
An example is given (using Outlook) at
http://www.xldynamic.com/source/xld.EarlyLate.html

--


Develop Early, Release Late ? That sounds like something I want to
remember. Nice!

/Fredrik



  #8   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 339
Default Reference Libraries


"ben" (remove this if mailing direct) wrote in message
...
hmmm ok it compliles ok runs ok but it just doesn't mail
anything................


Do you have an error handler in your code?

/Fredrik


  #9   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
ben ben is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 232
Default Reference Libraries

nevermind, stupid me, the worst of all errors, syntax was incorrect for one
variable. sigh. I really need finish changing this project to option
explicit, thanks all

"ben" wrote:

hmmm ok it compliles ok runs ok but it just doesn't mail
anything................

"Fredrik Wahlgren" wrote:


"Bob Phillips" wrote in message
...
You are referring to late binding, which doesn't bind to the application
type library at development/compile time, but makes multiple calls at
runtime.

Essentially, rather than setting a reference to the type library via
ToolsReferences, and then declaring an object of type Outlook.Application
or whatever, you create a generic Object variable and create that object
rather than just New.

You lose access to the application's object model and intellisens when you
do this, but there is another way, what I call Develop Early, Release

Late.
An example is given (using Outlook) at
http://www.xldynamic.com/source/xld.EarlyLate.html

--


Develop Early, Release Late ? That sounds like something I want to
remember. Nice!

/Fredrik



  #10   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,272
Default Reference Libraries

You don't use Option Explicit all the time?

You know you can set that in ToolsOptionsEditor tab, Require Variable
Declaration checkbox.

--

HTH

RP
(remove nothere from the email address if mailing direct)


"ben" (remove this if mailing direct) wrote in message
...
nevermind, stupid me, the worst of all errors, syntax was incorrect for

one
variable. sigh. I really need finish changing this project to option
explicit, thanks all

"ben" wrote:

hmmm ok it compliles ok runs ok but it just doesn't mail
anything................

"Fredrik Wahlgren" wrote:


"Bob Phillips" wrote in message
...
You are referring to late binding, which doesn't bind to the

application
type library at development/compile time, but makes multiple calls

at
runtime.

Essentially, rather than setting a reference to the type library via
ToolsReferences, and then declaring an object of type

Outlook.Application
or whatever, you create a generic Object variable and create that

object
rather than just New.

You lose access to the application's object model and intellisens

when you
do this, but there is another way, what I call Develop Early,

Release
Late.
An example is given (using Outlook) at
http://www.xldynamic.com/source/xld.EarlyLate.html

--


Develop Early, Release Late ? That sounds like something I want to
remember. Nice!

/Fredrik





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Reference Libraries and Add-Ins Rich Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 3 June 26th 09 10:13 PM
Importing libraries Roro Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 0 April 7th 06 01:31 PM
Porting VBA Libraries MWE[_42_] Excel Programming 1 May 9th 04 11:51 PM
Urgent!!! -- Reference libraries Michelle Excel Programming 3 September 30th 03 02:07 AM
Object libraries Lionel Fridjhon Excel Programming 9 August 29th 03 01:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ExcelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Microsoft Excel"