Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
Function layout
I'm creating a function that I and my co-workers will use extensively. The
company I work for has over 100 location and 6-8 different ways of referencing a location, four different number designations, three names and combinations of the above. The function will just translate from one type of name to another so there will only be two arguments. Personally I use a vlookup with a table with all the different names in many columns but many of my co-workers have a little difficulty understanding the vlookup. My question is whether it would make better sense to load the location info into an array with about 1500 items or to leave them in a sheet in the add-in and look them up from there? Jesse |
#2
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
Function layout
Jesse,
Personally, I would always leave them in a sheet, in a nice, simple, formatted manner. It's much easier to look at them then. This is how I build Commandbars by building such a table in a worksheet, much easier to maintain and know what my data relates to. -- HTH Bob Phillips ... looking out across Poole Harbour to the Purbecks (remove nothere from the email address if mailing direct) "Jesse" wrote in message news:SYdBb.28931$d35.18752@edtnps84... I'm creating a function that I and my co-workers will use extensively. The company I work for has over 100 location and 6-8 different ways of referencing a location, four different number designations, three names and combinations of the above. The function will just translate from one type of name to another so there will only be two arguments. Personally I use a vlookup with a table with all the different names in many columns but many of my co-workers have a little difficulty understanding the vlookup. My question is whether it would make better sense to load the location info into an array with about 1500 items or to leave them in a sheet in the add-in and look them up from there? Jesse |
#3
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
Function layout
Thanks for the advise Bob, I wasn't sure if I would gain enough in
performance to make it worth making an array for it. Jesse "Bob Phillips" wrote in message ... Jesse, Personally, I would always leave them in a sheet, in a nice, simple, formatted manner. It's much easier to look at them then. This is how I build Commandbars by building such a table in a worksheet, much easier to maintain and know what my data relates to. -- HTH Bob Phillips ... looking out across Poole Harbour to the Purbecks (remove nothere from the email address if mailing direct) "Jesse" wrote in message news:SYdBb.28931$d35.18752@edtnps84... I'm creating a function that I and my co-workers will use extensively. The company I work for has over 100 location and 6-8 different ways of referencing a location, four different number designations, three names and combinations of the above. The function will just translate from one type of name to another so there will only be two arguments. Personally I use a vlookup with a table with all the different names in many columns but many of my co-workers have a little difficulty understanding the vlookup. My question is whether it would make better sense to load the location info into an array with about 1500 items or to leave them in a sheet in the add-in and look them up from there? Jesse |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Layout | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Can I switch from Office 2007 layout to the old 2003 layout? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Help with schedule layout | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
A4 layout | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Print>Properties>Layout>Pages per sheet: this function/property . | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |