LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
Tom Hayakawa
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Harlan,

Actually, I was referring to the internal newsgroups in IBM and Lotus, which
I guess you haven't seen and which, unfortunately, I also no longer have
access to since I no longer work for IBM. It appears you are violently
agreeing with me - 123 does some things better, and Excel does some things
better. If it were possible to combine the good points of both, we'd have a
better spreadsheet app.

Pax,
Tom Hayakawa

"Harlan Grove" wrote:

Tom Hayakawa wrote...
Having used both over the years, I've come to the conclusion that both

have
strong and weak points, and both do the job, more or less. Actually,

yours
is a rather restrained posting - you should read how much people rag

on 123
over in the Lotus news groups....Does that say more about the manners

of
people who prefer Lotus or the zealousness of people who prefer Excel?

:)
....

What Lotus newsgroup? Ain't any Lotus 123 USENET-like newsgroups. Do
you mean comp.apps.spreadsheets? Or do you mean the Domino-hosted 123
community forum

http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/ssforum....Category=1-2-3

?

In either case, provide 1 link to any rags or rants against 123 posted
in the last 12 months. Just try to find one. Show us you're not just
spewing BS.

Anyone who knows anything about *BOTH* Excel and 123 knows that when it
comes to 'database' functions, 123 remains vastly supoerior to Excel
because Lotus decided to make @DSUM and the like capable of really
useful functionality back in 123 Release 3.0, which came out in 1989
(more than 15 years ago). Microsoft, on the other hand, decided that
merely copying 123 Release 2.x functionality was sufficient. For a
while Microsoft did provide an even better approach with its
SQL.REQUEST add-in function, but they've apparently deprecated it in
favor of nothing (i.e., it no longer ships with Excel 2003, and there's
no alternative provided).

The only really useful features 123 lacks compared to Excel are array
formulas, the OFFSET function, custom number formatting and the Text to
Columns wizard in worksheets and a securable object model and a decent
IDE in scripting. Most of the time 123 is superior to Excel in terms of
formulas. And it's nearly impossible to confuse 123 so thoroughly that
it'd need several megabytes of disk storage for a handful of formatted
cells.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to use SUMIF to return sums between two values located in cells ScottBerger Excel Worksheet Functions 2 April 23rd 23 09:05 PM
Use of the DSUM formula to find exact matches in datatables Rob Henson Excel Worksheet Functions 1 January 27th 05 02:14 AM
SUMIF - Range name to used for the "sum_range" portion of a SUMIF function Oscar Excel Worksheet Functions 2 January 11th 05 11:01 PM
formulas SUMIF & DSUM cvgairport Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 1 January 3rd 05 05:53 PM
DSUM frustrations Paul Adams Excel Worksheet Functions 0 November 12th 04 10:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 ExcelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Microsoft Excel"