Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harlan,
Actually, I was referring to the internal newsgroups in IBM and Lotus, which I guess you haven't seen and which, unfortunately, I also no longer have access to since I no longer work for IBM. It appears you are violently agreeing with me - 123 does some things better, and Excel does some things better. If it were possible to combine the good points of both, we'd have a better spreadsheet app. Pax, Tom Hayakawa "Harlan Grove" wrote: Tom Hayakawa wrote... Having used both over the years, I've come to the conclusion that both have strong and weak points, and both do the job, more or less. Actually, yours is a rather restrained posting - you should read how much people rag on 123 over in the Lotus news groups....Does that say more about the manners of people who prefer Lotus or the zealousness of people who prefer Excel? :) .... What Lotus newsgroup? Ain't any Lotus 123 USENET-like newsgroups. Do you mean comp.apps.spreadsheets? Or do you mean the Domino-hosted 123 community forum http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/ssforum....Category=1-2-3 ? In either case, provide 1 link to any rags or rants against 123 posted in the last 12 months. Just try to find one. Show us you're not just spewing BS. Anyone who knows anything about *BOTH* Excel and 123 knows that when it comes to 'database' functions, 123 remains vastly supoerior to Excel because Lotus decided to make @DSUM and the like capable of really useful functionality back in 123 Release 3.0, which came out in 1989 (more than 15 years ago). Microsoft, on the other hand, decided that merely copying 123 Release 2.x functionality was sufficient. For a while Microsoft did provide an even better approach with its SQL.REQUEST add-in function, but they've apparently deprecated it in favor of nothing (i.e., it no longer ships with Excel 2003, and there's no alternative provided). The only really useful features 123 lacks compared to Excel are array formulas, the OFFSET function, custom number formatting and the Text to Columns wizard in worksheets and a securable object model and a decent IDE in scripting. Most of the time 123 is superior to Excel in terms of formulas. And it's nearly impossible to confuse 123 so thoroughly that it'd need several megabytes of disk storage for a handful of formatted cells. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to use SUMIF to return sums between two values located in cells | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Use of the DSUM formula to find exact matches in datatables | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
SUMIF - Range name to used for the "sum_range" portion of a SUMIF function | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
formulas SUMIF & DSUM | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
DSUM frustrations | Excel Worksheet Functions |