#1   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Convert Function

There is an error in EXCEL 2002 convert function for BTU to flb.

1 BTU should convert to 778 flb; however, it is calculating 25037.

Can someone else confirm this error?

Thank you.
--
Bob
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,080
Default Convert Function

I can confirm this error in Excel 2003 as well.
__________________________________________________ _______________________

"rmace" wrote in message
...
There is an error in EXCEL 2002 convert function for BTU to flb.

1 BTU should convert to 778 flb; however, it is calculating 25037.

Can someone else confirm this error?

Thank you.
--
Bob



  #3   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,081
Default Convert Function

And in 2007

"Vasant Nanavati" wrote:

I can confirm this error in Excel 2003 as well.
__________________________________________________ _______________________

"rmace" wrote in message
...
There is an error in EXCEL 2002 convert function for BTU to flb.

1 BTU should convert to 778 flb; however, it is calculating 25037.

Can someone else confirm this error?

Thank you.
--
Bob




  #4   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 947
Default Convert Function

I would just be guessing here.
=CONVERT(1,"btu","flb")
25036.98

In my old "Handbook of Chemistry & Physics"
the closest conversion listed is
Btu to "Foot-Poundals", and listed as 25020.1

Hmmm. Still a little off.

However, if I flip the page, and reverse the conversion, the factor given is
a little less precise...
0.0000399417

but
=1/0.0000399417
returns
25,036.49

Much closer. So, my guess is that Microsoft copied the wrong conversion,
and didn't use enough digits.
--
Dana DeLouis


"Duke Carey" wrote in message
...
And in 2007

"Vasant Nanavati" wrote:

I can confirm this error in Excel 2003 as well.
__________________________________________________ _______________________

"rmace" wrote in message
...
There is an error in EXCEL 2002 convert function for BTU to flb.

1 BTU should convert to 778 flb; however, it is calculating 25037.

Can someone else confirm this error?

Thank you.
--
Bob






  #5   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Convert Function

I have checked several physics and thermodynamic references.
2 of them say 1 BTU = 778 foot pounds.
1 says 1 BTU = 778.3 foot pounds.
1 says 1 BTU = 1060 joules and 1 foot pound = 1.36 joules
which works out to 1 BTU = 779.411 foot pounds.
1 says 1 foot pound = . .001286 BTU
which works out to 1 BTU = 777.605 foot pounds.
A poundal is different than a pound by a factor of the gravitational constant
g = approx 32.2
And the error factor here is approximately = 32.2
Therefore if EXCEL actually meant foot-poundals, instead of foot-pounds,
then there conversion is correct; however, their reference for the convert
function says €śfoot pounds€ť and not €śfoot poundals€ť. In engineering
practice, €śfoot-poundals€ť are seldom used, €śfoot pounds€ť are the normal
measurement for energy.

So, maybe, the EXCEL code writers were confused on the units when they wrote
the convert code??

Thank you for your responses. I will send an email to microsoft support.
--
Bob


"Dana DeLouis" wrote:

I would just be guessing here.
=CONVERT(1,"btu","flb")
25036.98

In my old "Handbook of Chemistry & Physics"
the closest conversion listed is
Btu to "Foot-Poundals", and listed as 25020.1

Hmmm. Still a little off.

However, if I flip the page, and reverse the conversion, the factor given is
a little less precise...
0.0000399417

but
=1/0.0000399417
returns
25,036.49

Much closer. So, my guess is that Microsoft copied the wrong conversion,
and didn't use enough digits.
--
Dana DeLouis


"Duke Carey" wrote in message
...
And in 2007

"Vasant Nanavati" wrote:

I can confirm this error in Excel 2003 as well.
__________________________________________________ _______________________

"rmace" wrote in message
...
There is an error in EXCEL 2002 convert function for BTU to flb.

1 BTU should convert to 778 flb; however, it is calculating 25037.

Can someone else confirm this error?

Thank you.
--
Bob








  #6   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 947
Default Convert Function

Hi. This sure is a confusing conversion.
I learned a little something in a math program.
I was using Foot Pounds, and was flagged with the message "
Incompatible units"

? "SI"
SI[expr] converts expr to SI units (International System)

I had to use the correct unit of Force, and move it 1 foot to get the
conversion.
The newer software version seems to have a logic bug since I had to use
Convert.
SI[BTU/Convert[1*Foot*PoundForce, Joule]]

778.172603790403

If I use "Poundal", I seem to get Excel's conversion factor.

SI[BTU/Convert[Foot*Poundal, Joule]]

25036.945785921285

So, It does appear to me that Excel is using the wrong units of Force.

--
HTH :)
Dana DeLouis
Windows XP & Excel 2007


"rmace" wrote in message
...
I have checked several physics and thermodynamic references.
2 of them say 1 BTU = 778 foot pounds.
1 says 1 BTU = 778.3 foot pounds.
1 says 1 BTU = 1060 joules and 1 foot pound = 1.36 joules
which works out to 1 BTU = 779.411 foot pounds.
1 says 1 foot pound = . .001286 BTU
which works out to 1 BTU = 777.605 foot pounds.
A poundal is different than a pound by a factor of the gravitational
constant
g = approx 32.2
And the error factor here is approximately = 32.2
Therefore if EXCEL actually meant foot-poundals, instead of foot-pounds,
then there conversion is correct; however, their reference for the convert
function says "foot pounds" and not "foot poundals". In engineering
practice, "foot-poundals" are seldom used, "foot pounds" are the normal
measurement for energy.

So, maybe, the EXCEL code writers were confused on the units when they
wrote
the convert code??

Thank you for your responses. I will send an email to microsoft support.
--
Bob


"Dana DeLouis" wrote:

I would just be guessing here.
=CONVERT(1,"btu","flb")
25036.98

In my old "Handbook of Chemistry & Physics"
the closest conversion listed is
Btu to "Foot-Poundals", and listed as 25020.1

Hmmm. Still a little off.

However, if I flip the page, and reverse the conversion, the factor given
is
a little less precise...
0.0000399417

but
=1/0.0000399417
returns
25,036.49

Much closer. So, my guess is that Microsoft copied the wrong conversion,
and didn't use enough digits.
--
Dana DeLouis


"Duke Carey" wrote in message
...
And in 2007

"Vasant Nanavati" wrote:

I can confirm this error in Excel 2003 as well.
__________________________________________________ _______________________

"rmace" wrote in message
...
There is an error in EXCEL 2002 convert function for BTU to flb.

1 BTU should convert to 778 flb; however, it is calculating 25037.

Can someone else confirm this error?

Thank you.
--
Bob








Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Convert function to value JC Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 1 March 28th 07 02:35 AM
Convert function to value Max Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 0 March 28th 07 12:20 AM
Convert Function jayceejay New Users to Excel 3 October 18th 06 03:42 AM
Need a function to convert value in its name Abraham Excel Worksheet Functions 2 April 13th 06 04:03 AM
Convert function D Excel Worksheet Functions 2 January 5th 06 05:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ExcelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Microsoft Excel"