| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#3
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
Why full path in the formula to an UDF function?
Sorry Isabelle I could not express myself clearly enough. The point is: I want to completely get rid of the full path in front of the function. Because I have loaded the UDF, Excel should know that the function is in the loaded UDF w/o explicitly insert the path. As far as I understand the problem is how should I load the UDF in a way that Excel knows that its instance is loaded and the full path name is not required.
HÃ¥kan |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Using 'indirect' function with full network path | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
| Using 'indirect' function with full network path | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
| Full path possible to be seen? | New Users to Excel | |||
| Full path in title bar | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
| Syntax for using the full path to get a value | Excel Programming | |||
Threaded Mode
