Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 536
Default Claus code works on my data not on OP's data

Claus revamped some code of mine to find strings in data field and list the strings, headers of the columns the strings are in and the cell address of the string in three columns.

Tested on a small data set, worked just fine, I expanded the data set to the size of the OP's by using made up data and it too works just fine. (A bit slow but has to do with the For Each in... method looping is my guess)

I run it on OP's "real data" and the code crashes.

If you care to take a look, here is a link to my workbook with two sheets, OP Data and My Test.

Works on My Test, crashes on OP Data.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/l9iszq045r...rop%20Box.xlsm

Regards,
Howard
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,872
Default Claus code works on my data not on OP's data

Hi Howard,

Am Wed, 14 Aug 2013 10:05:15 -0700 (PDT) schrieb Howard:

If you care to take a look, here is a link to my workbook with two sheets, OP Data and My Test.

Works on My Test, crashes on OP Data.


you have to define the range in column A correctly. It takes time to
search for not existing Xs.
Your data works in 23 sec, the OP's data in 9 sec.
Have a look:
https://skydrive.live.com/#cid=9378A...121822A3%21326
for the workbook "Royal Bank String"


Regards
Claus B.
--
Win XP PRof SP2 / Vista Ultimate SP2
Office 2003 SP2 /2007 Ultimate SP2
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 536
Default Claus code works on my data not on OP's data



you have to define the range in column A correctly. It takes time to

search for not existing Xs.

Your data works in 23 sec, the OP's data in 9 sec.

Have a look:

https://skydrive.live.com/#cid=9378A...121822A3%21326

for the workbook "Royal Bank String"


Regards

Claus B.


Well, that certainly seems to do the trick.

Pretty tedious to check for accuracy with that many returns scattered all about in the data field.

I did study the returns of the much smaller data field and it was accurate, see no reason to doubt the accuracy of this much larger example.

I was clearly off base thinking filling the blanks in column A with an "X" was a benefit. Remove the blanks first makes a ton of sense.

Thanks Claus.

Regards,
Howard
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Claus From OP: Bob[_19_] Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 1 December 12th 12 06:53 PM
Importing Works data to Excel PeterC Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 1 April 1st 10 03:03 PM
Data validation only works once Dale G[_2_] Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 1 March 3rd 10 12:47 AM
Data validation- absolute ref or not- neither works Roady Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 3 September 29th 08 08:34 PM
Data menu and how it works T.Pete Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 0 March 8th 07 10:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ExcelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Microsoft Excel"