Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
XLL performance in NT and XP
Hi,
I have created a c++ based XLL which I use within Excel. The code in the XLL is fairly computationally intensive and uses old 'c' style calloc type declarations to assign dynamic memory. Unfortunately, I see dramatic difference is performance between running the XLL on a machine with NT (service pack 4) operating system and using a machine with XP or Win 2K. The difference is performance is amazing .. it can be 50 or 60 times quicker on the XP/Win2K OS. Any thoughts would be appreciated? Thxs, F. |
#2
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
XLL performance in NT and XP
F -
If you don't get an answer here, I suggest that you post in the microsoft.public.excel.sdk newsgroup. - Mike www.mikemiddleton.com wrote in message oups.com... Hi, I have created a c++ based XLL which I use within Excel. The code in the XLL is fairly computationally intensive and uses old 'c' style calloc type declarations to assign dynamic memory. Unfortunately, I see dramatic difference is performance between running the XLL on a machine with NT (service pack 4) operating system and using a machine with XP or Win 2K. The difference is performance is amazing .. it can be 50 or 60 times quicker on the XP/Win2K OS. Any thoughts would be appreciated? Thxs, F. |
#3
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
XLL performance in NT and XP
Thanks Mike - wasn't sure where to post it.
Fas |
#4
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
XLL performance in NT and XP
Thanks Mike - wasn't sure where to post it.
Fas |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Performance Issue | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Performance | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Performance IF(IF or IF(AND | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Formatting Performance | Excel Programming | |||
Bad performance | Excel Programming |