| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
2000 vs. 2003: Grand Totals
Just finished the hotfix mentioned in article 831824 regarding multilevel
subtotals being in the wrong position and it seems to work great. However, it seems (so I'm told) that our macros created in Excel 2000 would also include extra lines of Grand Totals that are apparently not present when these are run in Excel 2003. The problem is that the macros are set up to manually remove these grand total lines (which now has the effect of removing subtotals and corrupting the report instead.) As I don't relish the idea of reprogramming everything we have, is there some way to make Excel 2003 run the way it used to regarding the grand totals? Thanks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Grand Totals | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
| Pivot Totals: Group totals different from Grand totals | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
| Grand Totals with Nested Sub Totals | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
| Can't get Grand Totals (rows) to appear | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
| More Grand Totals | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Threaded Mode
