Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob,
Let's get back to the beginning: "...When I open the workbook I get a runtime error, but just ignore that and extract the data for your macro." The casualness of "just ignore that" irked me. I wish I had reacted like: Hi Bob, thanks for mentioning my addin. I'm not aware of a compile error, why didn't you send me an email of how, where and when this occurs.." Alas, I didn't and it looks like you're easily irked too. <g I can see the humour of a misunderstanding getting out of hand. BTW what about that email? -- keepITcool | www.XLsupport.com | keepITcool chello nl | amsterdam Bob Phillips wrote : Apparently my use of "ripping" versus your "extracting" was unfortunate. But that would be all in the translation, wouldn't it? No, ripping is an idiomatic use of the language that I would not expect to see in a translation of extracted. If the OP can normally use my addin, he has the option to create a wrokbook with all the translations in the addin. and he doesnt need to "rip" them, he can copy and paste them.. So what's the beef? Where is the difference between copying and pasting from a workbook that he has created from you add-in, or by extracting them (whether that be by copy and paste, or simply copying the ones that he wants) from the original workbook? If you don't mind that he uses the translations (and you have no right to IMO), then I don't see what you are complaining about. Rest assured that I will not cause you further offence by ever mentioning your add-in. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
excel functions and language pack | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
language of built-in functions | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Language of Functions | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
International Language Functions | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Changing the language of built-in functions? | New Users to Excel |