Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Jamie,
all my questions are answered with my testing, both test only showed the memory leak and nothing else as cleaning up was the only variable but the results were the same (= no effect of the variable). From your earlier post, it seems you may be experiencing a double leak i.e. one from the open xls and one from the Foxpro source. There's no difference when testing the mdb-linked foxpro table with and w/o cleaning up. you know, I'm testing the vehicle not the head;) I did not pay enough attention on my first quick test, now, both tests showed 43 sec and 23 MB of RAM with a result table of 540rows x 34cols, 30 queries, Ram started with 16.8MB. regards arno |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Maximum Number Of Worksheets In A Work Book-Not A Memory Issue???? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Excel 2003 memory issue | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Memory or power issue | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Charts appear snowy (e.g., tv) unless clicked on. Memory issue? | Charts and Charting in Excel | |||
Pivot Table Memory Issue - Excel crashes | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |