Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi RBS,
For one thing: Instead of Call CheckMissingTicks(nodChild, intDepth + 1) put CheckMissingTicks=CheckMissingTicks(nodChild, intDepth + 1) Don't know if it solves all your problems. Regards, Daniel M. "RB Smissaert" wrote in message ... Using Excel XP. Made a function (from an example pointed out by Tom Ogilvy) that checks for missing ticked checkboxes in a Treeview. It should return TRUE if a particular node is found (with a particular image) and no ticks have been found yet. The function does work when I check it with a messagebox, but it still returns FALSE when it should be TRUE. This is the function: Function CheckMissingTicks(ByRef nodCurrent As Node, _ ByVal intDepth As Integer) As Boolean Dim nodChild As Node Dim HasTick As Boolean If nodCurrent.Children 0 Then For Each nodChild In MainForm.TreeView1.Nodes If Not nodChild.Parent Is Nothing Then If nodChild.Parent Is nodCurrent Then If nodChild.Checked = True And _ Not nodChild.Image = 9 Then HasTick = True End If If HasTick = False And _ nodChild.Image = 9 Then 'collection node, but no tick found yet CheckMissingTicks = True Exit Function End If Call CheckMissingTicks(nodChild, intDepth + 1) End If End If Next nodChild End If End Function And this is how the function is called: If CheckMissingTicks(TreeView1.Nodes(1), 0) = True Then ............. I solved it for now by declaring a variable that will be true if the particular conditions are met and checking for this variable, but I am just puzzled by what is wrong here. Most likely I am overlooking something really simple and somebody could help me out easily. RBS |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, it works fine now.
Used Daniel's suggestion as it is a bit shorter. Wasn't sure about the Call keyword, but it was used in the example I mentioned. RBS "Daniel.M" wrote in message ... Hi RBS, For one thing: Instead of Call CheckMissingTicks(nodChild, intDepth + 1) put CheckMissingTicks=CheckMissingTicks(nodChild, intDepth + 1) Don't know if it solves all your problems. Regards, Daniel M. "RB Smissaert" wrote in message ... Using Excel XP. Made a function (from an example pointed out by Tom Ogilvy) that checks for missing ticked checkboxes in a Treeview. It should return TRUE if a particular node is found (with a particular image) and no ticks have been found yet. The function does work when I check it with a messagebox, but it still returns FALSE when it should be TRUE. This is the function: Function CheckMissingTicks(ByRef nodCurrent As Node, _ ByVal intDepth As Integer) As Boolean Dim nodChild As Node Dim HasTick As Boolean If nodCurrent.Children 0 Then For Each nodChild In MainForm.TreeView1.Nodes If Not nodChild.Parent Is Nothing Then If nodChild.Parent Is nodCurrent Then If nodChild.Checked = True And _ Not nodChild.Image = 9 Then HasTick = True End If If HasTick = False And _ nodChild.Image = 9 Then 'collection node, but no tick found yet CheckMissingTicks = True Exit Function End If Call CheckMissingTicks(nodChild, intDepth + 1) End If End If Next nodChild End If End Function And this is how the function is called: If CheckMissingTicks(TreeView1.Nodes(1), 0) = True Then ............. I solved it for now by declaring a variable that will be true if the particular conditions are met and checking for this variable, but I am just puzzled by what is wrong here. Most likely I am overlooking something really simple and somebody could help me out easily. RBS |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It may be shorter to write, but it doesn't exit your function as soon as a
True condition is encountered so you could continue to loop and do needless checks - thus shorter to write, longer to execute. Regards, Tom Ogilvy RB Smissaert wrote in message ... Thanks, it works fine now. Used Daniel's suggestion as it is a bit shorter. Wasn't sure about the Call keyword, but it was used in the example I mentioned. RBS "Daniel.M" wrote in message ... Hi RBS, For one thing: Instead of Call CheckMissingTicks(nodChild, intDepth + 1) put CheckMissingTicks=CheckMissingTicks(nodChild, intDepth + 1) Don't know if it solves all your problems. Regards, Daniel M. "RB Smissaert" wrote in message ... Using Excel XP. Made a function (from an example pointed out by Tom Ogilvy) that checks for missing ticked checkboxes in a Treeview. It should return TRUE if a particular node is found (with a particular image) and no ticks have been found yet. The function does work when I check it with a messagebox, but it still returns FALSE when it should be TRUE. This is the function: Function CheckMissingTicks(ByRef nodCurrent As Node, _ ByVal intDepth As Integer) As Boolean Dim nodChild As Node Dim HasTick As Boolean If nodCurrent.Children 0 Then For Each nodChild In MainForm.TreeView1.Nodes If Not nodChild.Parent Is Nothing Then If nodChild.Parent Is nodCurrent Then If nodChild.Checked = True And _ Not nodChild.Image = 9 Then HasTick = True End If If HasTick = False And _ nodChild.Image = 9 Then 'collection node, but no tick found yet CheckMissingTicks = True Exit Function End If Call CheckMissingTicks(nodChild, intDepth + 1) End If End If Next nodChild End If End Function And this is how the function is called: If CheckMissingTicks(TreeView1.Nodes(1), 0) = True Then ............. I solved it for now by declaring a variable that will be true if the particular conditions are met and checking for this variable, but I am just puzzled by what is wrong here. Most likely I am overlooking something really simple and somebody could help me out easily. RBS |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom, RBS,
Agreed. More than that, it will continue and potentialy find other Nodes (in the For Each) for which the call to CheckMissingTicks=CheckMissingTicks(nodChild, intDepth +1) will return False, thus overwriting a True previously found. So, apart of the speed issue, I think you SHOULD exit. That being said, the key issue here is in understanding : "It should return TRUE if a particular node is found (with a particular image) and no ticks have been found yet." What the 'yet' means? What is the ORDER (pre-order, post-order) of the tree traversal? I've never used the Treeview control (so beware! ;-)) but I don't understand why you would do an all nodes search "For each" loop (recall that ALL the nodes, not level by level, are counted with the current "For each") and then include a recursive call in it. I'm sure there is a way to optimize this search if the OP explains what he means by 'no ticks have been found yet'. If this is what I think, the OP doesn't need the recursive call at all. Regards, Daniel M. "Tom Ogilvy" wrote in message ... It may be shorter to write, but it doesn't exit your function as soon as a True condition is encountered so you could continue to loop and do needless checks - thus shorter to write, longer to execute. Regards, Tom Ogilvy RB Smissaert wrote in message ... Thanks, it works fine now. Used Daniel's suggestion as it is a bit shorter. Wasn't sure about the Call keyword, but it was used in the example I mentioned. RBS "Daniel.M" wrote in message ... Hi RBS, For one thing: Instead of Call CheckMissingTicks(nodChild, intDepth + 1) put CheckMissingTicks=CheckMissingTicks(nodChild, intDepth + 1) Don't know if it solves all your problems. Regards, Daniel M. "RB Smissaert" wrote in message ... Using Excel XP. Made a function (from an example pointed out by Tom Ogilvy) that checks for missing ticked checkboxes in a Treeview. It should return TRUE if a particular node is found (with a particular image) and no ticks have been found yet. The function does work when I check it with a messagebox, but it still returns FALSE when it should be TRUE. This is the function: Function CheckMissingTicks(ByRef nodCurrent As Node, _ ByVal intDepth As Integer) As Boolean Dim nodChild As Node Dim HasTick As Boolean If nodCurrent.Children 0 Then For Each nodChild In MainForm.TreeView1.Nodes If Not nodChild.Parent Is Nothing Then If nodChild.Parent Is nodCurrent Then If nodChild.Checked = True And _ Not nodChild.Image = 9 Then HasTick = True End If If HasTick = False And _ nodChild.Image = 9 Then 'collection node, but no tick found yet CheckMissingTicks = True Exit Function End If Call CheckMissingTicks(nodChild, intDepth + 1) End If End If Next nodChild End If End Function And this is how the function is called: If CheckMissingTicks(TreeView1.Nodes(1), 0) = True Then .............. I solved it for now by declaring a variable that will be true if the particular conditions are met and checking for this variable, but I am just puzzled by what is wrong here. Most likely I am overlooking something really simple and somebody could help me out easily. RBS |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had the same two thoughts. I noted that the function never set the value
to false, but overlooked the fact that it implicitly returned false when a true condition was not found, so it is as you state. I haven't used a treeview either, and I noted as well the check about parent - indicating that the loop was around all nodes, but did't know what is in that collection, so I didn't raise that. If this routine came from my suggestion as he indicated, I just provided a link to a book that provided the code. ---- < my post with the link ----- See this link: http://www.nuvisionmiami.com/books/vb6/files/ch03.pdf go to section 3.4.3 on page 25 of 48. ------------------------ In Visual Basic Controls in a Nutshell - Evan s. Dictor, he says all items are nodes and thus members of the nodes collection. I didn't go back and check the above reference, but I suspect the recursive approach is provided for traversing the structure of the control and as you suggest, to just check all nodes for a condition, as RB is doing, a simple loop through the collection of nodes would be sufficient. -- Regards, Tom Ogilvy Daniel.M wrote in message ... Tom, RBS, Agreed. More than that, it will continue and potentialy find other Nodes (in the For Each) for which the call to CheckMissingTicks=CheckMissingTicks(nodChild, intDepth +1) will return False, thus overwriting a True previously found. So, apart of the speed issue, I think you SHOULD exit. That being said, the key issue here is in understanding : "It should return TRUE if a particular node is found (with a particular image) and no ticks have been found yet." What the 'yet' means? What is the ORDER (pre-order, post-order) of the tree traversal? I've never used the Treeview control (so beware! ;-)) but I don't understand why you would do an all nodes search "For each" loop (recall that ALL the nodes, not level by level, are counted with the current "For each") and then include a recursive call in it. I'm sure there is a way to optimize this search if the OP explains what he means by 'no ticks have been found yet'. If this is what I think, the OP doesn't need the recursive call at all. Regards, Daniel M. "Tom Ogilvy" wrote in message ... It may be shorter to write, but it doesn't exit your function as soon as a True condition is encountered so you could continue to loop and do needless checks - thus shorter to write, longer to execute. Regards, Tom Ogilvy RB Smissaert wrote in message ... Thanks, it works fine now. Used Daniel's suggestion as it is a bit shorter. Wasn't sure about the Call keyword, but it was used in the example I mentioned. RBS "Daniel.M" wrote in message ... Hi RBS, For one thing: Instead of Call CheckMissingTicks(nodChild, intDepth + 1) put CheckMissingTicks=CheckMissingTicks(nodChild, intDepth + 1) Don't know if it solves all your problems. Regards, Daniel M. "RB Smissaert" wrote in message ... Using Excel XP. Made a function (from an example pointed out by Tom Ogilvy) that checks for missing ticked checkboxes in a Treeview. It should return TRUE if a particular node is found (with a particular image) and no ticks have been found yet. The function does work when I check it with a messagebox, but it still returns FALSE when it should be TRUE. This is the function: Function CheckMissingTicks(ByRef nodCurrent As Node, _ ByVal intDepth As Integer) As Boolean Dim nodChild As Node Dim HasTick As Boolean If nodCurrent.Children 0 Then For Each nodChild In MainForm.TreeView1.Nodes If Not nodChild.Parent Is Nothing Then If nodChild.Parent Is nodCurrent Then If nodChild.Checked = True And _ Not nodChild.Image = 9 Then HasTick = True End If If HasTick = False And _ nodChild.Image = 9 Then 'collection node, but no tick found yet CheckMissingTicks = True Exit Function End If Call CheckMissingTicks(nodChild, intDepth + 1) End If End If Next nodChild End If End Function And this is how the function is called: If CheckMissingTicks(TreeView1.Nodes(1), 0) = True Then ............. I solved it for now by declaring a variable that will be true if the particular conditions are met and checking for this variable, but I am just puzzled by what is wrong here. Most likely I am overlooking something really simple and somebody could help me out easily. RBS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to return a number instead of true/false with an if function? | New Users to Excel | |||
Search for 2 true arguments and return true or false | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
How do I make the true return a drop down list in the IF function? | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Function to return True/False if all are validated as True by ISNU | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Create a function to return text if two logical functions are true | Excel Worksheet Functions |