Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.interopoledde,microsoft.public.excel.links,microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a function F() implemented in an XLL, which depends on cell C.
Even though it calls Excel4(xlCoerce) on that cell, Excel doesn't seem to add the cell to the dependency graph. As a result, changes to cell C don't cause Excel to recalculate cells which call F(). Is there any way to force Excel to reevaluate the cell when C changes, which is compatible with Excel 2000? Thanks, Aaron Queenan. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
modifying name format within a cell | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Copying information from one cell to another without modifying it. | New Users to Excel | |||
Modifying cell references | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Modifying Cell Addresses and operating on them | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Modifying cell entries? | New Users to Excel |