Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi All...........
I have a file that takes about 90 seconds to recalc............using XL97. Can anyone tell me please if it would be any faster by ONLY upgrading to a newer version of Excel? Tks, Vaya con Dios, Chuck, CABGx3 |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Chuck,
If the file is not confidential and less than 10Mb then I would be glad to run it in both xl97 and xl2002 and compare the calculations times. It's your call. Regards, Jim Cone San Francisco, USA "CLR" wrote in message Hi All........... I have a file that takes about 90 seconds to recalc............using XL97. Can anyone tell me please if it would be any faster by ONLY upgrading to a newer version of Excel? Tks, Vaya con Dios, Chuck, CABGx3 |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the offer Jim......the file is on it's way.
Vaya con Dios, Chuck, CABGx3 "Jim Cone" wrote in message ... Hi Chuck, If the file is not confidential and less than 10Mb then I would be glad to run it in both xl97 and xl2002 and compare the calculations times. It's your call. Regards, Jim Cone San Francisco, USA "CLR" wrote in message Hi All........... I have a file that takes about 90 seconds to recalc............using XL97. Can anyone tell me please if it would be any faster by ONLY upgrading to a newer version of Excel? Tks, Vaya con Dios, Chuck, CABGx3 |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thanks for the offer Jim......the file is on it's way. Vaya con Dios, Chuck, CABGx3 "Jim Cone" wrote in message ... Hi Chuck, If the file is not confidential and less than 10Mb then I would be glad to run it in both xl97 and xl2002 and compare the calculations times. It's your call. Regards, Jim Cone San Francisco, USA "CLR" wrote in message Hi All........... I have a file that takes about 90 seconds to recalc............using XL97. Can anyone tell me please if it would be any faster by ONLY upgrading to a newer version of Excel? Tks, Vaya con Dios, Chuck, CABGx3 ------------------------------ Jim, When you run this for Chuck, please post the results back here again. There are some of us lurkers out here also interested in what you measure. Thanks... Bill |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill,
Will do, but I haven't got the file yet. Jim Cone ------------------------------ Jim, When you run this for Chuck, please post the results back here again. There are some of us lurkers out here also interested in what you measure. Thanks... Bill |
#6
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
For what it is worth... I received the .xls file, opened and ran it in three xl versions. The file was opened four to six times in each version. File size 6mb with 40 to 50 sheets. Done on Windows XP SP1, Pent 4 - 2.0 GHz, 512 memory. '------------------------------- File open time required... xl97 1 second xl2000 31 seconds (calculates on open) xl2002 75 seconds (calculates on open) File update time required... xl 97 40 seconds xl2000 19 seconds xl2002 19 seconds (Actual times varied by + - 0.5 seconds) '-------------------------------- Jim Cone "Jim Cone" wrote in message ... Hi Chuck, If the file is not confidential and less than 10Mb then I would be glad to run it in both xl97 and xl2002 and compare the calculations times. It's your call. Regards, Jim Cone San Francisco, USA "CLR" wrote in message Hi All........... I have a file that takes about 90 seconds to recalc............using XL97. Can anyone tell me please if it would be any faster by ONLY upgrading to a newer version of Excel? Tks, Vaya con Dios, Chuck, CABGx3 |
#7
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Cone wrote:
Hello, For what it is worth... I received the .xls file, opened and ran it in three xl versions. The file was opened four to six times in each version. File size 6mb with 40 to 50 sheets. Done on Windows XP SP1, Pent 4 - 2.0 GHz, 512 memory. '------------------------------- File open time required... xl97 1 second xl2000 31 seconds (calculates on open) xl2002 75 seconds (calculates on open) File update time required... xl 97 40 seconds xl2000 19 seconds xl2002 19 seconds (Actual times varied by + - 0.5 seconds) '-------------------------------- Jim Cone --------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the into Jim. Now for bonus points... Reading between the lines, it sounds like one can happily install both XL97 and a more current version under XP and they coexist -- the newer one doesn't update (over write) the old one. Did you have to do something clever to do this or is that how Excel installs itself normally? Thanks... Bill |
#8
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Many many thanks Jim......this is most interesting......I'll try to get some
more data tomorrow on a couple of slower machines..... Thanks again, Vaya con Dios, Chuck, CABGx3 "Jim Cone" wrote in message ... Hello, For what it is worth... I received the .xls file, opened and ran it in three xl versions. The file was opened four to six times in each version. File size 6mb with 40 to 50 sheets. Done on Windows XP SP1, Pent 4 - 2.0 GHz, 512 memory. '------------------------------- File open time required... xl97 1 second xl2000 31 seconds (calculates on open) xl2002 75 seconds (calculates on open) File update time required... xl 97 40 seconds xl2000 19 seconds xl2002 19 seconds (Actual times varied by + - 0.5 seconds) '-------------------------------- Jim Cone "Jim Cone" wrote in message ... Hi Chuck, If the file is not confidential and less than 10Mb then I would be glad to run it in both xl97 and xl2002 and compare the calculations times. It's your call. Regards, Jim Cone San Francisco, USA "CLR" wrote in message Hi All........... I have a file that takes about 90 seconds to recalc............using XL97. Can anyone tell me please if it would be any faster by ONLY upgrading to a newer version of Excel? Tks, Vaya con Dios, Chuck, CABGx3 |
#9
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill,
More than you wanted to know... Jim Cone December 2002 Modified June 11, 2003 Note - These recommendations were written before XL2003 was released. When installing / using multiple versions of MS suites or applications: 1. Install the oldest version first 2. Install in a separate folder. 3. If you want to keep your start menu shortcuts then rename them before installing a newer version. 4. Do a custom install and do not overwrite/replace the older versions. However... 5. Only one version of Outlook can be installed on a single operating system. 6. You specify the default version of the application by registering it using 'Start | Run'. Enter the full file path and name of the program. Note that /regserver is outside the quote marks... "C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Excel.exe" /regserver The above registers Excel 97 as the default on most systems. Change the file path / file name as appropriate. If you don't register the application then the last version installed becomes the default. 7. Do Not run multiple application versions at the same time. Close one before opening the other. 8. MS knowledge base articles follow in no particular order: 292491 - Office Automation When Multiple Versions of Office Are Installed 290576 - OffXP: Running Multiple Versions of Microsoft Office 218861 - Off2000: Running Multiple Versions of Microsoft Office 214388 - XL2000: Running Multiple Versions of Microsoft Excel 292584 - OffXP: Setup Overwrites Start Menu Items from Earlier Versions of office 210391 - Off2000: Setup May Remove Older Components (Just in case) 233499 - How To Change the Company Name and User Name After Setup 290528 - HowTo: Change the Company Name and User Name in an Office XP Program 280546: User Name And Company Name In Splash Screen Different From Names In "About" Dialog Box "Bill Martin" wrote in message Thanks for the into Jim. Now for bonus points... Reading between the lines, it sounds like one can happily install both XL97 and a more current version under XP and they coexist -- the newer one doesn't update (over write) the old one. Did you have to do something clever to do this or is that how Excel installs itself normally? Thanks... Bill |
#10
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
INdeed Bill...........more than one version of XL can exist on the same
machine. A while back I had 5.0, 97 and 2k all on one WinMe machine, and some fine individual from the Programming group gave me this nifty piece of code so I could keep track of which one I was using at the time......... Sub Auto_open() With Application Select Case Val(.Version) Case 10: .Caption = .Name & " 2002" Case 9: .Caption = .Name & " 2000" Case 8: .Caption = .Name & " 97" Case 7: .Caption = .Name & " 95" End Select End With End Sub Vaya con Dios, Chuck, CABGx3 "Bill Martin" wrote: Jim Cone wrote: Hello, For what it is worth... I received the .xls file, opened and ran it in three xl versions. The file was opened four to six times in each version. File size 6mb with 40 to 50 sheets. Done on Windows XP SP1, Pent 4 - 2.0 GHz, 512 memory. '------------------------------- File open time required... xl97 1 second xl2000 31 seconds (calculates on open) xl2002 75 seconds (calculates on open) File update time required... xl 97 40 seconds xl2000 19 seconds xl2002 19 seconds (Actual times varied by + - 0.5 seconds) '-------------------------------- Jim Cone --------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the into Jim. Now for bonus points... Reading between the lines, it sounds like one can happily install both XL97 and a more current version under XP and they coexist -- the newer one doesn't update (over write) the old one. Did you have to do something clever to do this or is that how Excel installs itself normally? Thanks... Bill |
#11
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Cone wrote:
Bill, More than you wanted to know... Jim Cone December 2002 Modified June 11, 2003 Note - These recommendations were written before XL2003 was released. When installing / using multiple versions of MS suites or applications: 1. Install the oldest version first 2. Install in a separate folder. 3. If you want to keep your start menu shortcuts then rename them before installing a newer version. 4. Do a custom install and do not overwrite/replace the older versions. However... 5. Only one version of Outlook can be installed on a single operating system. 6. You specify the default version of the application by registering it using 'Start | Run'. Enter the full file path and name of the program. Note that /regserver is outside the quote marks... "C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\Excel.exe" /regserver The above registers Excel 97 as the default on most systems. Change the file path / file name as appropriate. If you don't register the application then the last version installed becomes the default. 7. Do Not run multiple application versions at the same time. Close one before opening the other. 8. MS knowledge base articles follow in no particular order: 292491 - Office Automation When Multiple Versions of Office Are Installed 290576 - OffXP: Running Multiple Versions of Microsoft Office 218861 - Off2000: Running Multiple Versions of Microsoft Office 214388 - XL2000: Running Multiple Versions of Microsoft Excel 292584 - OffXP: Setup Overwrites Start Menu Items from Earlier Versions of office 210391 - Off2000: Setup May Remove Older Components (Just in case) 233499 - How To Change the Company Name and User Name After Setup 290528 - HowTo: Change the Company Name and User Name in an Office XP Program 280546: User Name And Company Name In Splash Screen Different From Names In "About" Dialog Box "Bill Martin" wrote in message Thanks for the into Jim. Now for bonus points... Reading between the lines, it sounds like one can happily install both XL97 and a more current version under XP and they coexist -- the newer one doesn't update (over write) the old one. Did you have to do something clever to do this or is that how Excel installs itself normally? Thanks... Bill ======================= Thanks Jim. I may finally break down and update my Excel. Bill |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Entering Times | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
time differences in a column | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Accumulate weekly time to total time in Excel. | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Time Sheet Calculation Help Needed! | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Xfer of XL95 custom menus into XL97 | Excel Worksheet Functions |