Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi everyone,
I found Excel 2003 is more friendly than Excel newest version! Location of many funtions of newest version are no longer easy to find. For example, "help", macro "buttons", etc. are just few to list. There are also some problems with graphs, even some bugs can be traced! It is a shame indeed! New versions should add enhancements; not put bottlenecks! Mike |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some hold that opinion, most don't. And should you take the time to
appreciate the changes, you will change your mind. Mike wrote: Hi everyone, I found Excel 2003 is more friendly than Excel newest version! Location of many funtions of newest version are no longer easy to find. For example, "help", macro "buttons", etc. are just few to list. There are also some problems with graphs, even some bugs can be traced! It is a shame indeed! New versions should add enhancements; not put bottlenecks! Mike |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree
-- Regards, Peo Sjoblom "Mike" wrote in message ... Hi everyone, I found Excel 2003 is more friendly than Excel newest version! Location of many funtions of newest version are no longer easy to find. For example, "help", macro "buttons", etc. are just few to list. There are also some problems with graphs, even some bugs can be traced! It is a shame indeed! New versions should add enhancements; not put bottlenecks! Mike |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
take the time to appreciate the changes,
you will change your mind. Maybe not! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "Bob I" wrote in message ... Some hold that opinion, most don't. And should you take the time to appreciate the changes, you will change your mind. Mike wrote: Hi everyone, I found Excel 2003 is more friendly than Excel newest version! Location of many funtions of newest version are no longer easy to find. For example, "help", macro "buttons", etc. are just few to list. There are also some problems with graphs, even some bugs can be traced! It is a shame indeed! New versions should add enhancements; not put bottlenecks! Mike |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 29, 12:05*pm, Bob I wrote:
Some hold that opinion, most don't. And should you take the time to appreciate the changes, you will change your mind. Mike wrote: Hi everyone, I found Excel 2003 is more friendly than Excel newest version! Location of many funtions of newest version are no longer easy to find. For example, "help", macro "buttons", etc. are just few to list. There are also some problems with graphs, even some bugs can be traced! It is a shame indeed! New versions should add enhancements; not put bottlenecks! Mike- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I agree, thanks...... |
#6
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
T. wrote on Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:37:32 -0400:
take the time to appreciate the changes, you will change your mind. Maybe not! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP I still use Excel 2002 but I think some of the mathematical features have been improved in the latest versions, notably curve fitting and generation of pseudo-random numbers. I've got some work arounds and I don't intend to get a newer version until I replace my machine. -- James Silverton Potomac, Maryland Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not |
#7
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The thing I don't like about Excel 2007 is the user interface. I will
*never* like it so I'll just have to tolerate it. I use Excel 2002 unless I *must* use Excel 2007. I don't do complex statistical analysis (not in my job description) so I can't comment on those aspects with regards to versions. -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP "James Silverton" wrote in message ... T. wrote on Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:37:32 -0400: take the time to appreciate the changes, you will change your mind. Maybe not! -- Biff Microsoft Excel MVP I still use Excel 2002 but I think some of the mathematical features have been improved in the latest versions, notably curve fitting and generation of pseudo-random numbers. I've got some work arounds and I don't intend to get a newer version until I replace my machine. -- James Silverton Potomac, Maryland Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not |
#8
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Who is "most"? I don't like 2007, and none of my clients have liked it.
One even yelled at me about it for a half hour (hey, it's billable!). - Jon ------- Jon Peltier Peltier Technical Services, Inc. http://peltiertech.com/ Bob I wrote: Some hold that opinion, most don't. And should you take the time to appreciate the changes, you will change your mind. Mike wrote: Hi everyone, I found Excel 2003 is more friendly than Excel newest version! Location of many funtions of newest version are no longer easy to find. For example, "help", macro "buttons", etc. are just few to list. There are also some problems with graphs, even some bugs can be traced! It is a shame indeed! New versions should add enhancements; not put bottlenecks! Mike |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
reporting newest/highest value | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Filtering by newest date | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Newest month formula | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Automatically use the newest number input in the formulas | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Finding the oldest & newest dates | Excel Worksheet Functions |