Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If your VLOOKUP range is sorted alphabetically by key column, you could use a
'range lookup' of true(or omitted), thus eliminating the need for XL to look at all the rows everytime. Downside of this is if you need an exact match, this won't work. -- Best Regards, Luke M *Remember to click "yes" if this post helped you!* "Brotherharry" wrote: I'm having to work with very large data sets using vlookups. e.g. I've 200k rows with an id in one sheet and I'm looking up corresponding values in a data range that's 20k rows and 4 columns in size in another sheet. I recognise there are probably solutions in moving data off into Access or whatnot, but hey, I'm here and I like Excel. so my question is can I influence the speed of calculation by how my data is structured in either the source or vlookup range? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
vlookup speed question | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
how do I put the symbol of structure above data | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
how do I put the symbol of structure above data | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
VLOOKUP - Saves entire directory structure | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
How can I Run a query from VB macro with out affect current data in the same sheet? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |