Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Previously I learned the following
=INDEX(rng,MATCH(SMALL(COUNTIF(rng,"<"&rng),N),COU NTIF(rng,"<"&rng),0)) array formula à ascending order =INDEX(rng,MATCH(LARGE(COUNTIF(rng,"<"&rng),N),COU NTIF(rng,"<"&rng),0)) array formula à descending order I use them to retrieve the Nth element in a data set of numbers or text. They work fine if there are no duplicates. Tonight I have discovered a formula created by David Hager which takes care of duplicates. But it is only good for numbers. =SMALL(IF(MATCH(rng2,rng2,0)=ROW(rng2)-MIN(ROW(rng2))+1,rng2,""),N) array formula -- ascending order =LARGE(IF(MATCH(rng2,rng2,0)=ROW(rng2)-MIN(ROW(rng2))+1,rng2,""),N) array formula -- descending order Don't know if I have missed anything. Biff, I will put them away in my stash although I can't think of an example why one would need to retrieve the Nth element. Comments welcome from all. |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't think of an example why one would need to retrieve the Nth element.
http://tinyurl.com/2cvlpd Biff "Epinn" wrote in message ... Previously I learned the following =INDEX(rng,MATCH(SMALL(COUNTIF(rng,"<"&rng),N),COU NTIF(rng,"<"&rng),0)) array formula à ascending order =INDEX(rng,MATCH(LARGE(COUNTIF(rng,"<"&rng),N),COU NTIF(rng,"<"&rng),0)) array formula à descending order I use them to retrieve the Nth element in a data set of numbers or text. They work fine if there are no duplicates. Tonight I have discovered a formula created by David Hager which takes care of duplicates. But it is only good for numbers. =SMALL(IF(MATCH(rng2,rng2,0)=ROW(rng2)-MIN(ROW(rng2))+1,rng2,""),N) array formula -- ascending order =LARGE(IF(MATCH(rng2,rng2,0)=ROW(rng2)-MIN(ROW(rng2))+1,rng2,""),N) array formula -- descending order Don't know if I have missed anything. Biff, I will put them away in my stash although I can't think of an example why one would need to retrieve the Nth element. Comments welcome from all. |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I use them to retrieve the Nth element in a data set of numbers or text.
Why do things the hard way? For numbers I can just use =SMALL(rng,N) This is good if there are no duplicates. Epinn "Epinn" wrote in message ... Previously I learned the following =INDEX(rng,MATCH(SMALL(COUNTIF(rng,"<"&rng),N),COU NTIF(rng,"<"&rng),0)) array formula à ascending order =INDEX(rng,MATCH(LARGE(COUNTIF(rng,"<"&rng),N),COU NTIF(rng,"<"&rng),0)) array formula à descending order I use them to retrieve the Nth element in a data set of numbers or text. They work fine if there are no duplicates. Tonight I have discovered a formula created by David Hager which takes care of duplicates. But it is only good for numbers. =SMALL(IF(MATCH(rng2,rng2,0)=ROW(rng2)-MIN(ROW(rng2))+1,rng2,""),N) array formula -- ascending order =LARGE(IF(MATCH(rng2,rng2,0)=ROW(rng2)-MIN(ROW(rng2))+1,rng2,""),N) array formula -- descending order Don't know if I have missed anything. Biff, I will put them away in my stash although I can't think of an example why one would need to retrieve the Nth element. Comments welcome from all. |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting timing. As usual, I learned something from you.
=SMALL(IF(ISNUMBER(rng),IF(MATCH(rng,rng,0)=ROW(rn g)-MIN(ROW(rng))+1,rng)),N) I don't really need "" in the formula. FALSE is fine. Checking for ISNUMBER is good as it takes care of blanks. However, both formulae give #NUM! error if N is larger than the number of unique values. I won't worry about it though. Your example makes sense. I was thinking of integers and I scratched my head. I won't worry about Nth unique element in a data set of *text* only. Epinn "T. Valko" wrote in message ... I can't think of an example why one would need to retrieve the Nth element. http://tinyurl.com/2cvlpd Biff "Epinn" wrote in message ... Previously I learned the following =INDEX(rng,MATCH(SMALL(COUNTIF(rng,"<"&rng),N),COU NTIF(rng,"<"&rng),0)) array formula à ascending order =INDEX(rng,MATCH(LARGE(COUNTIF(rng,"<"&rng),N),COU NTIF(rng,"<"&rng),0)) array formula à descending order I use them to retrieve the Nth element in a data set of numbers or text. They work fine if there are no duplicates. Tonight I have discovered a formula created by David Hager which takes care of duplicates. But it is only good for numbers. =SMALL(IF(MATCH(rng2,rng2,0)=ROW(rng2)-MIN(ROW(rng2))+1,rng2,""),N) array formula -- ascending order =LARGE(IF(MATCH(rng2,rng2,0)=ROW(rng2)-MIN(ROW(rng2))+1,rng2,""),N) array formula -- descending order Don't know if I have missed anything. Biff, I will put them away in my stash although I can't think of an example why one would need to retrieve the Nth element. Comments welcome from all. |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
=INDEX(rng,MATCH(SMALL(COUNTIF(rng,"<"&rng),N),COU NTIF(rng,"<"&rng),0))
array formula Ã* ascending order Thanks for posting this, it is just what I was looking for. To answer your question why it is useful, right now I've got a lookup table at work which lists physician specialties (which are text and duplicated), effective dates, and amounts. The last column of the table lists the unique, nonblank physician specialty descriptions which, in turn, is used by an input cell (on a different sheet) that has data validation applied (with the list option) so that the user can choose the specialty from a drop down box. A lookup formula uses the selected specialty description and date to return the proper amount from the table. When additional items are added to the table, the inputs for the drop down box will automatically update to include the new specialties. One other benefit is it eliminates typos (by the user - not the person updating the table) that would result in the specialty description not being found in the table since the drop down is fed from the same table used to do the lookup. But, I would like the drop down options in alphabetical order to make it easier to find the one you are looking for. "Epinn" wrote: Previously I learned the following =INDEX(rng,MATCH(SMALL(COUNTIF(rng,"<"&rng),N),COU NTIF(rng,"<"&rng),0)) array formula Ã* ascending order =INDEX(rng,MATCH(LARGE(COUNTIF(rng,"<"&rng),N),COU NTIF(rng,"<"&rng),0)) array formula Ã* descending order I use them to retrieve the Nth element in a data set of numbers or text. They work fine if there are no duplicates. Tonight I have discovered a formula created by David Hager which takes care of duplicates. But it is only good for numbers. =SMALL(IF(MATCH(rng2,rng2,0)=ROW(rng2)-MIN(ROW(rng2))+1,rng2,""),N) array formula -- ascending order =LARGE(IF(MATCH(rng2,rng2,0)=ROW(rng2)-MIN(ROW(rng2))+1,rng2,""),N) array formula -- descending order Don't know if I have missed anything. Biff, I will put them away in my stash although I can't think of an example why one would need to retrieve the Nth element. Comments welcome from all. |
#6
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
=INDEX(rng,MATCH(SMALL(COUNTIF(rng,"<"&rng),N),COU NTIF(rng,"<"&rng),0))
array formula Ã* ascending order Thanks for posting this, it is just what I was looking for. To answer your question why it is useful, right now I've got a lookup table at work which lists physician specialties (which are text and duplicated), effective dates, and amounts. The last column of the table lists the unique, nonblank physician specialty descriptions which, in turn, is used by an input cell (on a different sheet) that has data validation applied (with the list option) so that the user can choose the specialty from a drop down box. A lookup formula uses the selected specialty description and date to return the proper amount from the table. When additional items are added to the table, the inputs for the drop down box will automatically update to include the new specialties. One other benefit is it eliminates typos (by the user - not the person updating the table) that would result in the specialty description not being found in the table since the drop down is fed from the same table used to do the lookup. But, I would like the drop down options in alphabetical order to make it easier to find the one you are looking for. "Epinn" wrote: Previously I learned the following =INDEX(rng,MATCH(SMALL(COUNTIF(rng,"<"&rng),N),COU NTIF(rng,"<"&rng),0)) array formula Ã* ascending order =INDEX(rng,MATCH(LARGE(COUNTIF(rng,"<"&rng),N),COU NTIF(rng,"<"&rng),0)) array formula Ã* descending order I use them to retrieve the Nth element in a data set of numbers or text. They work fine if there are no duplicates. Tonight I have discovered a formula created by David Hager which takes care of duplicates. But it is only good for numbers. =SMALL(IF(MATCH(rng2,rng2,0)=ROW(rng2)-MIN(ROW(rng2))+1,rng2,""),N) array formula -- ascending order =LARGE(IF(MATCH(rng2,rng2,0)=ROW(rng2)-MIN(ROW(rng2))+1,rng2,""),N) array formula -- descending order Don't know if I have missed anything. Biff, I will put them away in my stash although I can't think of an example why one would need to retrieve the Nth element. Comments welcome from all. |
#7
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
However, both formulae give #NUM! error if N is larger
than the number of unique values. That's true. It could be trapped but you'd have to define what to trap. If N uniques what result would you want? It'll also error if there are no numbers in the range. Biff "Epinn" wrote in message ... Interesting timing. As usual, I learned something from you. =SMALL(IF(ISNUMBER(rng),IF(MATCH(rng,rng,0)=ROW(rn g)-MIN(ROW(rng))+1,rng)),N) I don't really need "" in the formula. FALSE is fine. Checking for ISNUMBER is good as it takes care of blanks. However, both formulae give #NUM! error if N is larger than the number of unique values. I won't worry about it though. Your example makes sense. I was thinking of integers and I scratched my head. I won't worry about Nth unique element in a data set of *text* only. Epinn "T. Valko" wrote in message ... I can't think of an example why one would need to retrieve the Nth element. http://tinyurl.com/2cvlpd Biff "Epinn" wrote in message ... Previously I learned the following =INDEX(rng,MATCH(SMALL(COUNTIF(rng,"<"&rng),N),COU NTIF(rng,"<"&rng),0)) array formula à ascending order =INDEX(rng,MATCH(LARGE(COUNTIF(rng,"<"&rng),N),COU NTIF(rng,"<"&rng),0)) array formula à descending order I use them to retrieve the Nth element in a data set of numbers or text. They work fine if there are no duplicates. Tonight I have discovered a formula created by David Hager which takes care of duplicates. But it is only good for numbers. =SMALL(IF(MATCH(rng2,rng2,0)=ROW(rng2)-MIN(ROW(rng2))+1,rng2,""),N) array formula -- ascending order =LARGE(IF(MATCH(rng2,rng2,0)=ROW(rng2)-MIN(ROW(rng2))+1,rng2,""),N) array formula -- descending order Don't know if I have missed anything. Biff, I will put them away in my stash although I can't think of an example why one would need to retrieve the Nth element. Comments welcome from all. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Error message-Dataset... | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Population Chart with 1 dataset | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Population Chart with 1 dataset | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Counting a Filtered Dataset | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
importing dataset beyond 256 columns | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |