Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Because merged cells are a real pain to work with.
I've seen routines that use simple find/findnext and compare with the first address found (like VBA's help shows) go into endless loops because of the way the find fails with merged cells. Hydra wrote: I'm using the find function to locate the column in which data is located. Some of the columns have merged cells. Searching row wise the function finds the first 8 targets and then skips over the ninth one, which is in merged cell. however it finds the target in column four, which is also a merged cell. The find function is searching for values, not formulas and my target text I "$". Any reason why it is missing some targets? -- Dave Peterson |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree. Merged cells are evil. It's often better to use Center Across Selection.
On 15-Dec-2009 11:51, Dave Peterson wrote: Because merged cells are a real pain to work with. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Form command not working on worksheet with merged cells | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Adding comment to cells not working with merged cells | Excel Programming | |||
VBA Find function does not work for merged cells. Potential BUG | Excel Programming | |||
.find with merged cell not working | Excel Programming | |||
Copy/Paste Merged Cells via Macro is not working | Excel Programming |