Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 59
Default grouping rows

Hello,
In Excel 2002 if you had lots of groups of rows in a sheet.
When you expanded/shrunk them, it would be done immediately.

Moving to Excel 2003, this process was slowed down. Almost to a crawl.

The thought around my office here, was it was done on purpose.
To show the end user the expansion.

Is there a way to make it run faster?
Like in the 2002 version?
is there a 2003 setting for this?

thanks


  #2   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 35,218
Default grouping rows

=subtotal() was enhanced in xl2003. It now provides a way to ignore rows that
are hidden -- not just by data|Filter|autofilter. (the 100 series parms like
=subtotal(10x,...))

But with that enhancement, xl2003 thinks that it should recalculate each time
you hide/unhide rows.

Maybe you could turn calculation to manual (Tools|Calculation tab), then do what
you want.

Remember to recalc or go back to automatic recalc before you trust the results
of any formula.

greg wrote:

Hello,
In Excel 2002 if you had lots of groups of rows in a sheet.
When you expanded/shrunk them, it would be done immediately.

Moving to Excel 2003, this process was slowed down. Almost to a crawl.

The thought around my office here, was it was done on purpose.
To show the end user the expansion.

Is there a way to make it run faster?
Like in the 2002 version?
is there a 2003 setting for this?

thanks


--

Dave Peterson
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel,microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 59
Default grouping rows

yes,
turning off calc does make it faster.
thanks

"Dave Peterson" wrote in message
...
=subtotal() was enhanced in xl2003. It now provides a way to ignore rows

that
are hidden -- not just by data|Filter|autofilter. (the 100 series parms

like
=subtotal(10x,...))

But with that enhancement, xl2003 thinks that it should recalculate each

time
you hide/unhide rows.

Maybe you could turn calculation to manual (Tools|Calculation tab), then

do what
you want.

Remember to recalc or go back to automatic recalc before you trust the

results
of any formula.

greg wrote:

Hello,
In Excel 2002 if you had lots of groups of rows in a sheet.
When you expanded/shrunk them, it would be done immediately.

Moving to Excel 2003, this process was slowed down. Almost to a crawl.

The thought around my office here, was it was done on purpose.
To show the end user the expansion.

Is there a way to make it run faster?
Like in the 2002 version?
is there a 2003 setting for this?

thanks


--

Dave Peterson



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
grouping rows AFE Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 1 February 13th 08 12:19 AM
grouping rows... kang New Users to Excel 5 June 10th 07 05:44 PM
Grouping Rows Moz Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 0 July 21st 06 05:33 AM
Grouping Rows Justin Philips Excel Programming 4 March 31st 06 07:27 PM
Grouping rows together Steve-o Excel Worksheet Functions 1 March 23rd 06 06:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ExcelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Microsoft Excel"