Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been told that a colleague is having problems with
UsedRange.Rows.Count returning a very large value that far exceeds the actual number of rows in the worksheet. Since we are iterating through the rows, although there are work-arounds we can use to identify the end of the data, it is a nuisance that this property seems to be unreliable. Has anyone else had a similar problem? Does anyone know of a cause? Is there a more reliable way of identifying the number of used rows in a worksheet, in order to iterate through them? I think that the code is currently running on Windows XP against Excel 2003, although it was originally developed and tested on Windows 2000 against Excel 2000. The object variables are all late bound. Regards, -- Jeff |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wrong output returned during IF function | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
excel result return wrong calcuation result | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Real Value of .UsedRange.Rows.Count | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Problem with UsedRange.Rows.Count | Excel Programming | |||
Finding row count and filtered rows returned by Autofilter | Excel Programming |