Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
why Microsoft Excel can't support if() multiple choices more then.
why Microsoft Excel can't support if() function for thousands of mulitple
choice without VBA coding |
#2
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
why Microsoft Excel can't support if() multiple choices more then.
Why? Because the programmers didn't "teach" it how to do that. They provided
the CHOOSE, HLOOKUP, VLOOKUP, and LOOKUP, and MATCH functions which may solve you problem if you describe what it is. On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 21:25:01 -0700, "reneabesmer" wrote: why Microsoft Excel can't support if() function for thousands of mulitple choice without VBA coding |
#3
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
why Microsoft Excel can't support if() multiple choices more then.
Because there are always limits (65000+ rows, characters in a cell,
worksheets in a book, etc.). We may not like the limits, but surely we can understand that not everything can be unlimited. In this instance there are so many alternatives that it does not even seem necessary to request MS to provide more, there are more pressing needs (more than 3 conditional formats for instance). -- HTH RP (remove nothere from the email address if mailing direct) "reneabesmer" wrote in message ... why Microsoft Excel can't support if() function for thousands of mulitple choice without VBA coding |
#4
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
why Microsoft Excel can't support if() multiple choices more then.
reneabesmer shared this with us in microsoft.public.excel.programming:
why Microsoft Excel can't support if() function for thousands of mulitple choice without VBA coding You raise a well thought criticism. A Really Good Design[0] allows either Zero, One, or Infinity[1]. If Two is allowed, it can be argumented that Three would also be acceptable, and why not Four, ad infinitum. However, this is only theory. In the Real World, programmers have to do concessions. Sometimes a fixed limitation is used so that more optimi(s|z)ed algorithms can be used, with a faster program as a result. A theoretical Good Design is not always the fastest design. When a limitation has to be chosen, you'll usually see a power of two in an Almost As Good Design (or sometimes a power of two -1). In the case of Excel you can use 8 nested if() functions: 8 = 2^3, and 8 is also the number of bits in one byte. On a similar matter, please read http://j-walk.com/ss/excel/odd/odd13.htm [0] I use capitals to indicate abstract concepts. You shouldn't interpret the capitali(s|z)ed words literally. Think "Discworld" (Terry Pratchett) to grep the context. [1] only limited by memory, disk space, or other physical limitations. -- Amedee Van Gasse using XanaNews 1.17.3.1 If it has an "X" in the name, it must be Linux? How To Ask Questions The Smart Way http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html How to Report Bugs Effectively http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html Only ask questions with yes/no answers if you want "yes" or "no" as the answer. http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoyn...-with-yes-or-n o-answers.html |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Support for Multiple Monitors Excel 2003 | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
How to find the right discussion groups for Microsoft Support? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Excel should support multiple monitors better (like Word does) | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Can Excel support Multiple Users | Excel Programming | |||
Microsoft Support Information - 159780 and 214232 | Excel Programming |