Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
arno -
I always recommend to use randomize plus rnd()^rnd(). Besides creating "unique" numbers I think that many people try to use Excel random numbers for some exact scientific analysis. This analysis could be ignored simply by the fact of using excel as a random number generator that does not meet scientific expectations to random numbers. I hope my recommendation "improves" the random numbers of excel. < The worksheet function RAND and the VBA function RND produce uniformly distributed random numbers. That is, a number between 0.0 and 0.1 is as likely as a number between 0.9 and 1.0. The product RAND*RAND or RND*RND is random, but it is not uniformly distributed. Products between 0.0 and 0.1 are much more likely than products between 0.9 and 1.0. However, I would greatly appreciate if someone could shed some light on how "good" excel random numbers are, for what analysis they can be used for and where one should not use excel. < For such information about RAND, see http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;828795 - Mike www.mikemiddleton.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sorting random Data created from a random formula | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Non-random numbers generated by excel's data analysis random gener | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Non-random numbers generated by excel's data analysis random gener | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
How do I find random number in list of random alpha? (Position is. | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
random | Excel Programming |