Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Using VBA Userforms or VB Forms depends on what you want to do.
I prefer VB Forms because those can be directly import into VB .NET and converted to Windows Forms in .NET. It is possible/likely(?) that MSFT may provide a future tool for converting VBA Userforms to .NET Windoze Forms, but that's just a guess. Using VB, instead of VBA, also allows one to use some features of VB 6 that are not available in VBA for Office 97, so one can more easily code for ALL windows versions of Office. For example, see http://www.standards.com/Sorting/Sor...scription.html. which describes a VB 6 .exe that uses both Excel and Word in Office 97 and up. -- http://www.standards.com/; See Howard Kaikow's web site. "RB Smissaert" wrote in message ... OK, one more in favour of VB6. Any arguments for this? How about my question about the userforms and if working with Office Developer generally would be easier? RBS "Howard Kaikow" wrote in message ... I agree that VB 6 is best. VSTO only works with Office 2003. -- http://www.standards.com/; See Howard Kaikow's web site. "Chip Pearson" wrote in message ... The Visual Studio Tools For Office requires that you have Visual Studio 2003 installed. For writing COM Add-Ins, VB6 is best (you can do it in VBNET, but this would require that you distribute the NET runtime -- about 20MB -- to each user), but Office XP Developer will do the job. -- Cordially, Chip Pearson Microsoft MVP - Excel Pearson Software Consulting, LLC www.cpearson.com "RB Smissaert" wrote in message ... Trying to figure out what the best way is to make a COM add-in. It only will have to work with Excel. I understand you will need either VB6 (or one of the other types of VB) or Office Developer for this. I would like to make a COM add-in based on a .xla add-in that has already been developed. Now I am not sure if this is true, but I understand that this would be easier to do with Office Developer. I understand that Office Developer XP is still available and that this will cost around £330, but there is now also something called Visual Studio Tools for Office 2003. I work in Office 2003. Would this be the package to go for (Visual Studio Tools for Office 2003) or would Office XP Developer be fine? Then again if I would go with Office XP Developer could I keep using Office 2003? Quite a few confusing issues and I would be greatful for any advice. RBS |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
An additional charts package? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Splitting an Add-in package over several Add-ins | Excel Programming | |||
How to package macro/VBA for commercial use? | Excel Programming | |||
How to package macro/VBA for commercial use? | Excel Programming | |||
Deciding on a Reporting Package | Excel Programming |