LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 269
Default Best package to make COM add-in

Using VBA Userforms or VB Forms depends on what you want to do.
I prefer VB Forms because those can be directly import into VB .NET and
converted to Windows Forms in .NET.
It is possible/likely(?) that MSFT may provide a future tool for converting
VBA Userforms to .NET Windoze Forms, but that's just a guess.

Using VB, instead of VBA, also allows one to use some features of VB 6 that
are not available in VBA for Office 97, so one can more easily code for ALL
windows versions of Office.

For example, see
http://www.standards.com/Sorting/Sor...scription.html.
which describes a VB 6 .exe that uses both Excel and Word in Office 97 and
up.
--
http://www.standards.com/; See Howard Kaikow's web site.
"RB Smissaert" wrote in message
...
OK, one more in favour of VB6.
Any arguments for this?
How about my question about the userforms and if working with Office
Developer
generally would be easier?

RBS


"Howard Kaikow" wrote in message
...
I agree that VB 6 is best.

VSTO only works with Office 2003.

--
http://www.standards.com/; See Howard Kaikow's web site.
"Chip Pearson" wrote in message
...
The Visual Studio Tools For Office requires that you have Visual
Studio 2003 installed. For writing COM Add-Ins, VB6 is best (you
can do it in VBNET, but this would require that you distribute
the NET runtime -- about 20MB -- to each user), but Office XP
Developer will do the job.


--
Cordially,
Chip Pearson
Microsoft MVP - Excel
Pearson Software Consulting, LLC
www.cpearson.com




"RB Smissaert" wrote in message
...
Trying to figure out what the best way is to make a COM add-in.
It only will
have to work with Excel.
I understand you will need either VB6 (or one of the other
types of VB) or
Office Developer for this.
I would like to make a COM add-in based on a .xla add-in that
has already
been developed.

Now I am not sure if this is true, but I understand that this
would be
easier to do with Office Developer.
I understand that Office Developer XP is still available and
that this will
cost around £330, but there is now
also something called Visual Studio Tools for Office 2003. I
work in Office
2003. Would this be the package to go for (Visual Studio Tools
for Office
2003) or would Office XP Developer be fine? Then again if I
would go with
Office XP Developer could I keep using Office 2003?

Quite a few confusing issues and I would be greatful for any
advice.


RBS








 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
An additional charts package? [email protected] Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 2 January 22nd 05 07:49 PM
Splitting an Add-in package over several Add-ins R Avery Excel Programming 1 March 1st 04 02:58 PM
How to package macro/VBA for commercial use? Haydn Williams Excel Programming 1 November 5th 03 11:21 AM
How to package macro/VBA for commercial use? Haydn Williams Excel Programming 0 November 5th 03 09:16 AM
Deciding on a Reporting Package G[_4_] Excel Programming 0 October 13th 03 06:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 ExcelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Microsoft Excel"