Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default Macro speeds in 95 vs 98 vs 2000

Can anyone help ?

We have a macro that amongst other things formats cells
which runs using excel 95 - however when we run this
macro using excel 98 or higher we have noticed a
considerable increase in the length of time taken to
complete the run. Is this due to the vast increase in
the number of cells it might have to format in the later
versions of excel or is it a change in the vba itself?

Many thanks
KD
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Macro speeds in 95 vs 98 vs 2000

Formatting is always time consuming if you are doing it by cell o
range.

I save a lot of time by using Copy/Paste instead - sometimes eve
having a hidden sheet containing ready-formatted ranges

--
Message posted from http://www.ExcelForum.com

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Troubleshooting Excel 2003 calculation speeds JCWeaver in Raleigh Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 1 December 3rd 07 05:35 PM
calculating speeds in mph Jock W Excel Worksheet Functions 8 July 2nd 06 12:23 PM
Slow Calculation speeds in big spreadsheet MichaelC Excel Worksheet Functions 1 March 16th 06 08:47 PM
Macro in Excel 2000 Raymond Dorais Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 1 January 17th 06 03:08 AM
XP vs 2000 macro error Michael Miazga[_2_] Excel Programming 1 July 21st 03 09:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 ExcelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Microsoft Excel"