Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello FellowNewsgroupReaders,
To protect my work I add passwords to The various parts of my applications. Looking around in the archives in search of the maximum lengths and effective lengths there are various answers, possiblitities etc. As a small example to the problem I encounter: a worksheet, protected in Excel XP wit a passwordlength of 30 cannot be opened in Excel 2000. Only a word of 15 (created in XP) will be accepted in 2000. In the archives all kinds of different answers are whirring around, like a password of 30 chars. need only 4 to be cracked etc. I AM aware that one can crack passwords, no problem. I think of the protection more as a safeguard. So. I'm so bold to ask the universal and ultimate question -but now in total- about passwords: What is the maximum effective length of passwords for the following matrix? 97 2000 XP Workbook Workbook structure Worksheet password VBA Project Regards, Rob |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you "think of protection more as a safeguard", then you need a
password length of zero (just protect the worksheet/workbook and don't enter a password). That will keep users from inadvertently changing things. For worksheet/workbook passwords, all password lengths are hashed to a fixed-length, so running a macro to remove protection is faster than trying even all one-character passwords. See http://www.mcgimpsey.com/excel/removepwords.html Various VBA project password crackers appear to work instantantly, indicating that length is not relevant. In fact, a hex editor can usually recover the bulk of your code, even if you have the project protected, since the project isn't encrypted. In article , "Rob" wrote: Hello FellowNewsgroupReaders, To protect my work I add passwords to The various parts of my applications. Looking around in the archives in search of the maximum lengths and effective lengths there are various answers, possiblitities etc. As a small example to the problem I encounter: a worksheet, protected in Excel XP wit a passwordlength of 30 cannot be opened in Excel 2000. Only a word of 15 (created in XP) will be accepted in 2000. In the archives all kinds of different answers are whirring around, like a password of 30 chars. need only 4 to be cracked etc. I AM aware that one can crack passwords, no problem. I think of the protection more as a safeguard. So. I'm so bold to ask the universal and ultimate question -but now in total- about passwords: What is the maximum effective length of passwords for the following matrix? 97 2000 XP Workbook Workbook structure Worksheet password VBA Project Regards, Rob |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello J.E,
About my remark on the safeguard: I already knew that cracking is easy. It's just that you can make it a bit more difficult for the very average user. The link to your page is very helpful. I read that hacking the VBA pasword (which is the most important for me, for all procedures are in there) is more difficult. so if I want to make it -even for specialised programs- as difficult and timeconsuming as possible, what will my ultimate passwodlength for the VBA-editor be? Regards, Rob "J.E. McGimpsey" schreef in bericht ... If you "think of protection more as a safeguard", then you need a password length of zero (just protect the worksheet/workbook and don't enter a password). That will keep users from inadvertently changing things. For worksheet/workbook passwords, all password lengths are hashed to a fixed-length, so running a macro to remove protection is faster than trying even all one-character passwords. See http://www.mcgimpsey.com/excel/removepwords.html Various VBA project password crackers appear to work instantantly, indicating that length is not relevant. In fact, a hex editor can usually recover the bulk of your code, even if you have the project protected, since the project isn't encrypted. In article , "Rob" wrote: Hello FellowNewsgroupReaders, To protect my work I add passwords to The various parts of my applications. Looking around in the archives in search of the maximum lengths and effective lengths there are various answers, possiblitities etc. As a small example to the problem I encounter: a worksheet, protected in Excel XP wit a passwordlength of 30 cannot be opened in Excel 2000. Only a word of 15 (created in XP) will be accepted in 2000. In the archives all kinds of different answers are whirring around, like a password of 30 chars. need only 4 to be cracked etc. I AM aware that one can crack passwords, no problem. I think of the protection more as a safeguard. So. I'm so bold to ask the universal and ultimate question -but now in total- about passwords: What is the maximum effective length of passwords for the following matrix? 97 2000 XP Workbook Workbook structure Worksheet password VBA Project Regards, Rob |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello J.E,
About my remark on the safeguard: I already knew that cracking is easy. It's just that you can make it a bit more difficult for the very average user. The link to your page is very helpful. I read that hacking the VBA pasword (which is the most important for me, for all procedures are in there) is more difficult. so if I want to make it -even for specialised programs- as difficult and timeconsuming as possible, what will my ultimate passwodlength for the VBA-editor be? Regards, Rob "J.E. McGimpsey" schreef in bericht ... If you "think of protection more as a safeguard", then you need a password length of zero (just protect the worksheet/workbook and don't enter a password). That will keep users from inadvertently changing things. For worksheet/workbook passwords, all password lengths are hashed to a fixed-length, so running a macro to remove protection is faster than trying even all one-character passwords. See http://www.mcgimpsey.com/excel/removepwords.html Various VBA project password crackers appear to work instantantly, indicating that length is not relevant. In fact, a hex editor can usually recover the bulk of your code, even if you have the project protected, since the project isn't encrypted. In article , "Rob" wrote: Hello FellowNewsgroupReaders, To protect my work I add passwords to The various parts of my applications. Looking around in the archives in search of the maximum lengths and effective lengths there are various answers, possiblitities etc. As a small example to the problem I encounter: a worksheet, protected in Excel XP wit a passwordlength of 30 cannot be opened in Excel 2000. Only a word of 15 (created in XP) will be accepted in 2000. In the archives all kinds of different answers are whirring around, like a password of 30 chars. need only 4 to be cracked etc. I AM aware that one can crack passwords, no problem. I think of the protection more as a safeguard. So. I'm so bold to ask the universal and ultimate question -but now in total- about passwords: What is the maximum effective length of passwords for the following matrix? 97 2000 XP Workbook Workbook structure Worksheet password VBA Project Regards, Rob |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Excel Data Protection Best Practice: AKA: Real Sheet Protection | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Excel Data Protection- AKA: Sheet/Macro Password Protection | Setting up and Configuration of Excel | |||
Excel2007 limiting Pre-2007 Worksheet protection passwords to 15 c | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Passwords | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Protection with different passwords | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |