| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
New Excel 2003
Are there any gains to the new as compared to excel 2002
I have got a very large spread sheet and I am not that proficient at programming. Are the limitations the same as in 2002 version in memory used, size of file etc. Is there a limitation on VBA procedure sizes, etc |
|
#2
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
|
New Excel 2003
Excel 2003 is little changed over 2002 to be honest. The specs are
identical. -- Jim Rech Excel MVP |
|
#3
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.programming
|
|||
|
|||
|
New Excel 2003
The one improvement in XL 2003 is in the statistical functions. Until now
STDEV(99,100,101) correctly gave 1 but STDEV(99999999, 100000000, 100000001) gave 0 (wrong). This and similar algorithm problems have been solved. Bernard "David" wrote in message ... Are there any gains to the new as compared to excel 2002 I have got a very large spread sheet and I am not that proficient at programming. Are the limitations the same as in 2002 version in memory used, size of file etc. Is there a limitation on VBA procedure sizes, etc |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Excel 2007 versus Excel 2003 & Excel 97-2003 fully compatible | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
| Convert Excel 2003 spreadsheet into Outlook Contacts table 2003 | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
| import Excel 2003 file into Outlook 2003 - NO NAMED RANGES?? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
| Copying Excel 2003 Selection into Outlook 2003 HTML E-Mail Message | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
| Excel 2003 Database Driver Visual FoxPro 7 on Server 2003. | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Hybrid Mode
