Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am using 2007 version of Excel to design a spreadsheet at work. It is
capable of over handling over 16,000 columns. The users of my spreadsheat have 2002 version of Excel. If the update/upgrade via downloading the compatibility software, will they then be able to also handle the 16,000+ columns? My design is utilizing 3000 columns per worksheet with over 100 worksheets in the workbook. Thanks, Les |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a word: No. Even with the compatibility pack installed in the older
version of Excel, it's simply not going to be able to deal with columns beyond the 256th column (IV). I don't know what you're building, but I really must ask if you haven't considered some other solution, such as a database application. "WLMPilot" wrote: I am using 2007 version of Excel to design a spreadsheet at work. It is capable of over handling over 16,000 columns. The users of my spreadsheat have 2002 version of Excel. If the update/upgrade via downloading the compatibility software, will they then be able to also handle the 16,000+ columns? My design is utilizing 3000 columns per worksheet with over 100 worksheets in the workbook. Thanks, Les |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was afraid of that. As for using Access, after posing a question
concerning option groups and numerous answer/questions post, I decided on Excel. I am using Excel to QA patient care reports for an EMS service. I probably don't need 3000 columns, but definitely need at least 1500 to allow for each employee the possibility of writing at least that many reports in a year's time. I was going to set up a workbook per year and have a worksheet per employee. Now it looks like I will need to do a workbook per employee and a worksheet per month. Thanks for your help. Les "JLatham" wrote: In a word: No. Even with the compatibility pack installed in the older version of Excel, it's simply not going to be able to deal with columns beyond the 256th column (IV). I don't know what you're building, but I really must ask if you haven't considered some other solution, such as a database application. "WLMPilot" wrote: I am using 2007 version of Excel to design a spreadsheet at work. It is capable of over handling over 16,000 columns. The users of my spreadsheat have 2002 version of Excel. If the update/upgrade via downloading the compatibility software, will they then be able to also handle the 16,000+ columns? My design is utilizing 3000 columns per worksheet with over 100 worksheets in the workbook. Thanks, Les |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Compatibility Issue | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Excel 2003 compatibility issue | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
EXCEL 2007 COMPATIBILITY MODE ISSUE | Setting up and Configuration of Excel | |||
excel 2007 compatibility issue | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
could the #NAME? error be a compatibility issue? | New Users to Excel |