#1   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 470
Default Compatibility Issue

I am using 2007 version of Excel to design a spreadsheet at work. It is
capable of over handling over 16,000 columns.

The users of my spreadsheat have 2002 version of Excel. If the
update/upgrade via downloading the compatibility software, will they then be
able to also handle the 16,000+ columns?

My design is utilizing 3000 columns per worksheet with over 100 worksheets
in the workbook.

Thanks,
Les
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,203
Default Compatibility Issue

In a word: No. Even with the compatibility pack installed in the older
version of Excel, it's simply not going to be able to deal with columns
beyond the 256th column (IV).

I don't know what you're building, but I really must ask if you haven't
considered some other solution, such as a database application.

"WLMPilot" wrote:

I am using 2007 version of Excel to design a spreadsheet at work. It is
capable of over handling over 16,000 columns.

The users of my spreadsheat have 2002 version of Excel. If the
update/upgrade via downloading the compatibility software, will they then be
able to also handle the 16,000+ columns?

My design is utilizing 3000 columns per worksheet with over 100 worksheets
in the workbook.

Thanks,
Les

  #3   Report Post  
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 470
Default Compatibility Issue

I was afraid of that. As for using Access, after posing a question
concerning option groups and numerous answer/questions post, I decided on
Excel. I am using Excel to QA patient care reports for an EMS service. I
probably don't need 3000 columns, but definitely need at least 1500 to allow
for each employee the possibility of writing at least that many reports in a
year's time. I was going to set up a workbook per year and have a worksheet
per employee. Now it looks like I will need to do a workbook per employee
and a worksheet per month.

Thanks for your help.

Les

"JLatham" wrote:

In a word: No. Even with the compatibility pack installed in the older
version of Excel, it's simply not going to be able to deal with columns
beyond the 256th column (IV).

I don't know what you're building, but I really must ask if you haven't
considered some other solution, such as a database application.

"WLMPilot" wrote:

I am using 2007 version of Excel to design a spreadsheet at work. It is
capable of over handling over 16,000 columns.

The users of my spreadsheat have 2002 version of Excel. If the
update/upgrade via downloading the compatibility software, will they then be
able to also handle the 16,000+ columns?

My design is utilizing 3000 columns per worksheet with over 100 worksheets
in the workbook.

Thanks,
Les

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Compatibility Issue WLMPilot Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 2 March 8th 10 01:43 PM
Excel 2003 compatibility issue news4naeem Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 0 January 15th 10 06:06 AM
EXCEL 2007 COMPATIBILITY MODE ISSUE Gemi Setting up and Configuration of Excel 1 September 29th 08 03:01 AM
excel 2007 compatibility issue joromajr Excel Discussion (Misc queries) 1 July 20th 08 09:10 AM
could the #NAME? error be a compatibility issue? sweetsourpork New Users to Excel 2 November 23rd 07 07:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 ExcelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Microsoft Excel"