There are three lists of numbers under column A,B,C
Is there any build-in function to determine the stability within change?
For example,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
On above list, there is no change at all, which is considered very stable.

Does anyone have any suggestions on following lists?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions
Eric

Under column A:
1064 1099 1116 1154 1105 1118 1092 1089 1087 1055 1057 1058 967 923 874 845
864 950 1024 971
Under column B:
845 840 887 863 865 886 851 843 825 805 818 792 711 687 677 642 642 640 681
702
Under column C:
1064 1065 1100 1129 1098 1120 1086 1084 1070 1022 1034 1003 921 883 862 843
843 882 923 905

Consider the standard deviation
=STDEV()
--
Gary''s Student - gsnu200812


"Eric" wrote:

There are three lists of numbers under column A,B,C
Is there any build-in function to determine the stability within change?
For example,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
On above list, there is no change at all, which is considered very stable.

Does anyone have any suggestions on following lists?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions
Eric

Under column A:
1064 1099 1116 1154 1105 1118 1092 1089 1087 1055 1057 1058 967 923 874 845
864 950 1024 971
Under column B:
845 840 887 863 865 886 851 843 825 805 818 792 711 687 677 642 642 640 681
702
Under column C:
1064 1065 1100 1129 1098 1120 1086 1084 1070 1022 1034 1003 921 883 862 843
843 882 923 905

Does anyone have any suggestions on how to select the most stability among 3
lists?
If I use STDEV(), I cannot compare which one is the most stability with
different scaling.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thank everyone for any suggestions
Eric

"Gary''s Student" wrote:

Consider the standard deviation
=STDEV()
--
Gary''s Student - gsnu200812


"Eric" wrote:

There are three lists of numbers under column A,B,C
Is there any build-in function to determine the stability within change?
For example,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
On above list, there is no change at all, which is considered very stable.

Does anyone have any suggestions on following lists?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions
Eric

Under column A:
1064 1099 1116 1154 1105 1118 1092 1089 1087 1055 1057 1058 967 923 874 845
864 950 1024 971
Under column B:
845 840 887 863 865 886 851 843 825 805 818 792 711 687 677 642 642 640 681
702
Under column C:
1064 1065 1100 1129 1098 1120 1086 1084 1070 1022 1034 1003 921 883 862 843
843 882 923 905

Try confidence (see spreadsheet help). Use the 95% and compare rresults.

"Eric" wrote:

Does anyone have any suggestions on how to select the most stability among 3
lists?
If I use STDEV(), I cannot compare which one is the most stability with
different scaling.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thank everyone for any suggestions
Eric

"Gary''s Student" wrote:

Consider the standard deviation
=STDEV()
--
Gary''s Student - gsnu200812


"Eric" wrote:

There are three lists of numbers under column A,B,C
Is there any build-in function to determine the stability within change?
For example,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
On above list, there is no change at all, which is considered very stable.

Does anyone have any suggestions on following lists?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions
Eric

Under column A:
1064 1099 1116 1154 1105 1118 1092 1089 1087 1055 1057 1058 967 923 874 845
864 950 1024 971
Under column B:
845 840 887 863 865 886 851 843 825 805 818 792 711 687 677 642 642 640 681
702
Under column C:
1064 1065 1100 1129 1098 1120 1086 1084 1070 1022 1034 1003 921 883 862 843
843 882 923 905

Thank everyone very much for suggestions

After using the function confidence (95%, 2 S.D. 100 data samples)
there are the result, 0.133, 0.155, 0.137.
Does it mean that data under column A will be the most stable?
Do they compare like with like? since they are different set of numbers?
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thank everyone very much for any suggestions
Eric

"Joel" wrote:

Try confidence (see spreadsheet help). Use the 95% and compare rresults.

"Eric" wrote:

Does anyone have any suggestions on how to select the most stability among 3
lists?
If I use STDEV(), I cannot compare which one is the most stability with
different scaling.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thank everyone for any suggestions
Eric

"Gary''s Student" wrote:

Consider the standard deviation
=STDEV()
--
Gary''s Student - gsnu200812


"Eric" wrote:

There are three lists of numbers under column A,B,C
Is there any build-in function to determine the stability within change?
For example,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
On above list, there is no change at all, which is considered very stable.

Does anyone have any suggestions on following lists?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions
Eric

Under column A:
1064 1099 1116 1154 1105 1118 1092 1089 1087 1055 1057 1058 967 923 874 845
864 950 1024 971
Under column B:
845 840 887 863 865 886 851 843 825 805 818 792 711 687 677 642 642 640 681
702
Under column C:
1064 1065 1100 1129 1098 1120 1086 1084 1070 1022 1034 1003 921 883 862 843
843 882 923 905

For 95% you should be entering .05 like the VBA help indicates.

What confidience means for 0.133 is that 95% of your Normalized Value will
lie on the x-axis over a span of 0.133. the smaller the number the more
stable your results.

3 sigma is normally refered to as 95% which means that 95% of your measured
values will be within the center of a normal curve. 6 Sigma results which is
98% is better results. 6 Sigma will have a smaller confidence number.

What we are doing is looking only at 95% of the data and throwing the rest
away and then seeing how the 95% of the data compares between the three
differrent sets of data. You may want to run the data at 90% and compare the
90% results to the 95% results.

"Eric" wrote:

Thank everyone very much for suggestions

After using the function confidence (95%, 2 S.D. 100 data samples)
there are the result, 0.133, 0.155, 0.137.
Does it mean that data under column A will be the most stable?
Do they compare like with like? since they are different set of numbers?
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thank everyone very much for any suggestions
Eric

"Joel" wrote:

Try confidence (see spreadsheet help). Use the 95% and compare rresults.

"Eric" wrote:

Does anyone have any suggestions on how to select the most stability among 3
lists?
If I use STDEV(), I cannot compare which one is the most stability with
different scaling.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thank everyone for any suggestions
Eric

"Gary''s Student" wrote:

Consider the standard deviation
=STDEV()
--
Gary''s Student - gsnu200812


"Eric" wrote:

There are three lists of numbers under column A,B,C
Is there any build-in function to determine the stability within change?
For example,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
On above list, there is no change at all, which is considered very stable.

Does anyone have any suggestions on following lists?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions
Eric

Under column A:
1064 1099 1116 1154 1105 1118 1092 1089 1087 1055 1057 1058 967 923 874 845
864 950 1024 971
Under column B:
845 840 887 863 865 886 851 843 825 805 818 792 711 687 677 642 642 640 681
702
Under column C:
1064 1065 1100 1129 1098 1120 1086 1084 1070 1022 1034 1003 921 883 862 843
843 882 923 905

You can use Stdev - Standard Deviation as a simple method.

A better method is to use NORMDIST which uses the Standard Deviation to
calculate the width of the Normalized curve. The width of the normalized
curve is oftern refer to by the Term sigma. 3 sigma would indicate 95
percent of the results where inside th enormalized curve. 6 sigma is
something like 98%.
"Eric" wrote:

There are three lists of numbers under column A,B,C
Is there any build-in function to determine the stability within change?
For example,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
On above list, there is no change at all, which is considered very stable.

Does anyone have any suggestions on following lists?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions
Eric

Under column A:
1064 1099 1116 1154 1105 1118 1092 1089 1087 1055 1057 1058 967 923 874 845
864 950 1024 971
Under column B:
845 840 887 863 865 886 851 843 825 805 818 792 711 687 677 642 642 640 681
702
Under column C:
1064 1065 1100 1129 1098 1120 1086 1084 1070 1022 1034 1003 921 883 862 843
843 882 923 905

Yours is perhaps a different sigma from that usually used. The percentage
between the -3 sigma and +3 sigma points is about 99.73%
Try =NORMSDIST(3)-NORMSDIST(-3)
--
David Biddulph

"Joel" wrote in message
...
You can use Stdev - Standard Deviation as a simple method.

A better method is to use NORMDIST which uses the Standard Deviation to
calculate the width of the Normalized curve. The width of the normalized
curve is oftern refer to by the Term sigma. 3 sigma would indicate 95
percent of the results where inside th enormalized curve. 6 sigma is
something like 98%.
"Eric" wrote:

There are three lists of numbers under column A,B,C
Is there any build-in function to determine the stability within change?
For example,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
On above list, there is no change at all, which is considered very
stable.

Does anyone have any suggestions on following lists?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions
Eric

Under column A:
1064 1099 1116 1154 1105 1118 1092 1089 1087 1055 1057 1058 967 923 874
845
864 950 1024 971
Under column B:
845 840 887 863 865 886 851 843 825 805 818 792 711 687 677 642 642 640
681
702
Under column C:
1064 1065 1100 1129 1098 1120 1086 1084 1070 1022 1034 1003 921 883 862
843
843 882 923 905

You are right. I was thinking of 1 Sigma being +/-1 which is 95%.

"David Biddulph" wrote:

Yours is perhaps a different sigma from that usually used. The percentage
between the -3 sigma and +3 sigma points is about 99.73%
Try =NORMSDIST(3)-NORMSDIST(-3)
--
David Biddulph

"Joel" wrote in message
...
You can use Stdev - Standard Deviation as a simple method.

A better method is to use NORMDIST which uses the Standard Deviation to
calculate the width of the Normalized curve. The width of the normalized
curve is oftern refer to by the Term sigma. 3 sigma would indicate 95
percent of the results where inside th enormalized curve. 6 sigma is
something like 98%.
"Eric" wrote:

There are three lists of numbers under column A,B,C
Is there any build-in function to determine the stability within change?
For example,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
On above list, there is no change at all, which is considered very
stable.

Does anyone have any suggestions on following lists?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions
Eric

Under column A:
1064 1099 1116 1154 1105 1118 1092 1089 1087 1055 1057 1058 967 923 874
845
864 950 1024 971
Under column B:
845 840 887 863 865 886 851 843 825 805 818 792 711 687 677 642 642 640
681
702
Under column C:
1064 1065 1100 1129 1098 1120 1086 1084 1070 1022 1034 1003 921 883 862
843
843 882 923 905

I think you're still misremembering.

Joel wrote:

You are right. I was thinking of 1 Sigma being +/-1 which is 95%.

"David Biddulph" wrote:

Yours is perhaps a different sigma from that usually used. The percentage
between the -3 sigma and +3 sigma points is about 99.73%
Try =NORMSDIST(3)-NORMSDIST(-3)
--
David Biddulph

"Joel" wrote in message
...
You can use Stdev - Standard Deviation as a simple method.

A better method is to use NORMDIST which uses the Standard Deviation to
calculate the width of the Normalized curve. The width of the normalized
curve is oftern refer to by the Term sigma. 3 sigma would indicate 95
percent of the results where inside th enormalized curve. 6 sigma is
something like 98%.
"Eric" wrote:

There are three lists of numbers under column A,B,C
Is there any build-in function to determine the stability within change?
For example,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
On above list, there is no change at all, which is considered very
stable.

Does anyone have any suggestions on following lists?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions
Eric

Under column A:
1064 1099 1116 1154 1105 1118 1092 1089 1087 1055 1057 1058 967 923 874
845
864 950 1024 971
Under column B:
845 840 887 863 865 886 851 843 825 805 818 792 711 687 677 642 642 640
681
702
Under column C:
1064 1065 1100 1129 1098 1120 1086 1084 1070 1022 1034 1003 921 883 862
843
843 882 923 905





--

Dave Peterson

+/- 2 sigma (not 1) is pretty close to 95%
=NORMSDIST(2)-NORMSDIST(-2)
--
David Biddulph

"Joel" wrote in message
...
You are right. I was thinking of 1 Sigma being +/-1 which is 95%.

"David Biddulph" wrote:

Yours is perhaps a different sigma from that usually used. The
percentage
between the -3 sigma and +3 sigma points is about 99.73%
Try =NORMSDIST(3)-NORMSDIST(-3)
--
David Biddulph

"Joel" wrote in message
...
You can use Stdev - Standard Deviation as a simple method.

A better method is to use NORMDIST which uses the Standard Deviation
to
calculate the width of the Normalized curve. The width of the
normalized
curve is oftern refer to by the Term sigma. 3 sigma would indicate 95
percent of the results where inside th enormalized curve. 6 sigma is
something like 98%.
"Eric" wrote:

There are three lists of numbers under column A,B,C
Is there any build-in function to determine the stability within
change?
For example,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
On above list, there is no change at all, which is considered very
stable.

Does anyone have any suggestions on following lists?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions
Eric

Under column A:
1064 1099 1116 1154 1105 1118 1092 1089 1087 1055 1057 1058 967 923
874
845
864 950 1024 971
Under column B:
845 840 887 863 865 886 851 843 825 805 818 792 711 687 677 642 642
640
681
702
Under column C:
1064 1065 1100 1129 1098 1120 1086 1084 1070 1022 1034 1003 921 883
862
843
843 882 923 905

For NORMDIST(x,mean,standard_dev,cumulative), could you please tell me where
to locate the sample of data for measurement?
Thank everyone very much for any suggestions
Eric

"David Biddulph" wrote:

Yours is perhaps a different sigma from that usually used. The percentage
between the -3 sigma and +3 sigma points is about 99.73%
Try =NORMSDIST(3)-NORMSDIST(-3)
--
David Biddulph

"Joel" wrote in message
...
You can use Stdev - Standard Deviation as a simple method.

A better method is to use NORMDIST which uses the Standard Deviation to
calculate the width of the Normalized curve. The width of the normalized
curve is oftern refer to by the Term sigma. 3 sigma would indicate 95
percent of the results where inside th enormalized curve. 6 sigma is
something like 98%.
"Eric" wrote:

There are three lists of numbers under column A,B,C
Is there any build-in function to determine the stability within change?
For example,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
On above list, there is no change at all, which is considered very
stable.

Does anyone have any suggestions on following lists?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions
Eric

Under column A:
1064 1099 1116 1154 1105 1118 1092 1089 1087 1055 1057 1058 967 923 874
845
864 950 1024 971
Under column B:
845 840 887 863 865 886 851 843 825 805 818 792 711 687 677 642 642 640
681
702
Under column C:
1064 1065 1100 1129 1098 1120 1086 1084 1070 1022 1034 1003 921 883 862
843
843 882 923 905

If this is similar to your other question about the CONFIDENCE function, you
could use =NORMDIST(x,AVERAGE(range),STDEV(range),cumulative ), but you need
to remember that NORMDIST is telling you the shape of the distribution if
you know that the population has a Normal distribution with a particular
mean and standard deviation, but if you have a sample of data it may or may
not have a Normal distribution. If, for example, your data is produced from
the RAND() function, which gives a uniform distribution, the NORMDIST
function isn't going to tell you anything very meaningful about that
population. It is wise to understand the statistical theory you are using
before you start trying to use the Excel functions.
--
David Biddulph

"Eric" wrote in message
...
For NORMDIST(x,mean,standard_dev,cumulative), could you please tell me
where
to locate the sample of data for measurement?
Thank everyone very much for any suggestions
Eric

"David Biddulph" wrote:

Yours is perhaps a different sigma from that usually used. The
percentage
between the -3 sigma and +3 sigma points is about 99.73%
Try =NORMSDIST(3)-NORMSDIST(-3)
--
David Biddulph

"Joel" wrote in message
...
You can use Stdev - Standard Deviation as a simple method.

A better method is to use NORMDIST which uses the Standard Deviation
to
calculate the width of the Normalized curve. The width of the
normalized
curve is oftern refer to by the Term sigma. 3 sigma would indicate 95
percent of the results where inside th enormalized curve. 6 sigma is
something like 98%.
"Eric" wrote:

There are three lists of numbers under column A,B,C
Is there any build-in function to determine the stability within
change?
For example,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
On above list, there is no change at all, which is considered very
stable.

Does anyone have any suggestions on following lists?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions
Eric

Under column A:
1064 1099 1116 1154 1105 1118 1092 1089 1087 1055 1057 1058 967 923
874
845
864 950 1024 971
Under column B:
845 840 887 863 865 886 851 843 825 805 818 792 711 687 677 642 642
640
681
702
Under column C:
1064 1065 1100 1129 1098 1120 1086 1084 1070 1022 1034 1003 921 883
862
843
843 882 923 905