Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good Evening Guys, Excel 2007
I have a query about Named Ranges and the associated calculation speeds. I have a wb which uses a master sheet which runs to over 35,000 rows & only 15 Columns. I run another ss which has 5 vlookup columns referencing to the master sheet. Now I have been trying to use Named Ranges to make the vlookup's easier.(and faster) I have saved the same wb as three seperate workbooks, and have found the following: WB1: Named Ranges using offset & counta, file size 6.73mb Calc time 5 mins WB2: Named Ranges using index & counta, file size 6.87mb Calc time 13 secs WB3: No Named Ranges - Just Absolute Cell Referencing, file size 8.08mb Calc time 04 secs Is someone able to explain this, as I was under the mpession that it was always advisable to use named ranges. Thank you in advance. Mathew |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Using Query and expanding named ranges | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Importing Excel named ranges using MS Query | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Calculation of named cell ranges | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Calculation of hourly rate times hours times 1.5 | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Like 123, allow named ranges, and print named ranges | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |