Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am trying to string together IF functions to fulfill my requirements.
However if i need more than 7 conditions (from my understanding the nested IF functions only go up to 7 cases) is there an alternative to this that would give me the same results? Thanks |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:14:01 -0700, Dave
wrote: I am trying to string together IF functions to fulfill my requirements. However if i need more than 7 conditions (from my understanding the nested IF functions only go up to 7 cases) is there an alternative to this that would give me the same results? Thanks Yes there is. --ron |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
can you specify?
"Ron Rosenfeld" wrote: On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:14:01 -0700, Dave wrote: I am trying to string together IF functions to fulfill my requirements. However if i need more than 7 conditions (from my understanding the nested IF functions only go up to 7 cases) is there an alternative to this that would give me the same results? Thanks Yes there is. --ron |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 7-function limit is true for all nested functions in versions
prior to 2007. What are the actual if conditions? There are several techniques to circumvent this limitations, with nested IFs. On Aug 20, 1:18 pm, Ron Rosenfeld wrote: On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:14:01 -0700, Dave wrote: I am trying to string together IF functions to fulfill my requirements. However if i need more than 7 conditions (from my understanding the nested IF functions only go up to 7 cases) is there an alternative to this that would give me the same results? Thanks Yes there is. --ron |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not unless you provide more information as to what you are trying to do. There
are any number of workarounds, but with the limited information you provided in your initial post, it is difficult to advise you further. If you don't want to supply any more information, you could look at VLOOKUP and also at Chip Pearson's web site http://www.cpearson.com/excel.htm On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:36:04 -0700, Dave wrote: can you specify? "Ron Rosenfeld" wrote: On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:14:01 -0700, Dave wrote: I am trying to string together IF functions to fulfill my requirements. However if i need more than 7 conditions (from my understanding the nested IF functions only go up to 7 cases) is there an alternative to this that would give me the same results? Thanks Yes there is. --ron --ron |
#6
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ive figured out an alternative however another problem has occured. I have
used the CONCATENATE function to circumvent this problem however when i try to format the number outputted it will not let me adjust it (if i wanted 2 decimal places or even change to a percent). I have conditional formatting set but i doubt that will affect the decimal places? Any advice? "iliace" wrote: The 7-function limit is true for all nested functions in versions prior to 2007. What are the actual if conditions? There are several techniques to circumvent this limitations, with nested IFs. On Aug 20, 1:18 pm, Ron Rosenfeld wrote: On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:14:01 -0700, Dave wrote: I am trying to string together IF functions to fulfill my requirements. However if i need more than 7 conditions (from my understanding the nested IF functions only go up to 7 cases) is there an alternative to this that would give me the same results? Thanks Yes there is. --ron |
#7
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Take a look at the TEXT() function.
In article , Dave wrote: Ive figured out an alternative however another problem has occured. I have used the CONCATENATE function to circumvent this problem however when i try to format the number outputted it will not let me adjust it (if i wanted 2 decimal places or even change to a percent). I have conditional formatting set but i doubt that will affect the decimal places? Any advice? "iliace" wrote: The 7-function limit is true for all nested functions in versions prior to 2007. What are the actual if conditions? There are several techniques to circumvent this limitations, with nested IFs. On Aug 20, 1:18 pm, Ron Rosenfeld wrote: On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:14:01 -0700, Dave wrote: I am trying to string together IF functions to fulfill my requirements. However if i need more than 7 conditions (from my understanding the nested IF functions only go up to 7 cases) is there an alternative to this that would give me the same results? Thanks Yes there is. --ron |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
nested if based on nested if in seperate sheet. how? | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
If alternative | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Alternative to Indirect | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Nested Vlookup or alternative? | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
"AverageIF" alternative | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |