![]() |
Nested IF fn Alternative
I am trying to string together IF functions to fulfill my requirements.
However if i need more than 7 conditions (from my understanding the nested IF functions only go up to 7 cases) is there an alternative to this that would give me the same results? Thanks |
Nested IF fn Alternative
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:14:01 -0700, Dave
wrote: I am trying to string together IF functions to fulfill my requirements. However if i need more than 7 conditions (from my understanding the nested IF functions only go up to 7 cases) is there an alternative to this that would give me the same results? Thanks Yes there is. --ron |
Nested IF fn Alternative
can you specify?
"Ron Rosenfeld" wrote: On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:14:01 -0700, Dave wrote: I am trying to string together IF functions to fulfill my requirements. However if i need more than 7 conditions (from my understanding the nested IF functions only go up to 7 cases) is there an alternative to this that would give me the same results? Thanks Yes there is. --ron |
Nested IF fn Alternative
The 7-function limit is true for all nested functions in versions
prior to 2007. What are the actual if conditions? There are several techniques to circumvent this limitations, with nested IFs. On Aug 20, 1:18 pm, Ron Rosenfeld wrote: On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:14:01 -0700, Dave wrote: I am trying to string together IF functions to fulfill my requirements. However if i need more than 7 conditions (from my understanding the nested IF functions only go up to 7 cases) is there an alternative to this that would give me the same results? Thanks Yes there is. --ron |
Nested IF fn Alternative
Not unless you provide more information as to what you are trying to do. There
are any number of workarounds, but with the limited information you provided in your initial post, it is difficult to advise you further. If you don't want to supply any more information, you could look at VLOOKUP and also at Chip Pearson's web site http://www.cpearson.com/excel.htm On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:36:04 -0700, Dave wrote: can you specify? "Ron Rosenfeld" wrote: On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:14:01 -0700, Dave wrote: I am trying to string together IF functions to fulfill my requirements. However if i need more than 7 conditions (from my understanding the nested IF functions only go up to 7 cases) is there an alternative to this that would give me the same results? Thanks Yes there is. --ron --ron |
Nested IF fn Alternative
Ive figured out an alternative however another problem has occured. I have
used the CONCATENATE function to circumvent this problem however when i try to format the number outputted it will not let me adjust it (if i wanted 2 decimal places or even change to a percent). I have conditional formatting set but i doubt that will affect the decimal places? Any advice? "iliace" wrote: The 7-function limit is true for all nested functions in versions prior to 2007. What are the actual if conditions? There are several techniques to circumvent this limitations, with nested IFs. On Aug 20, 1:18 pm, Ron Rosenfeld wrote: On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:14:01 -0700, Dave wrote: I am trying to string together IF functions to fulfill my requirements. However if i need more than 7 conditions (from my understanding the nested IF functions only go up to 7 cases) is there an alternative to this that would give me the same results? Thanks Yes there is. --ron |
Nested IF fn Alternative
Take a look at the TEXT() function.
In article , Dave wrote: Ive figured out an alternative however another problem has occured. I have used the CONCATENATE function to circumvent this problem however when i try to format the number outputted it will not let me adjust it (if i wanted 2 decimal places or even change to a percent). I have conditional formatting set but i doubt that will affect the decimal places? Any advice? "iliace" wrote: The 7-function limit is true for all nested functions in versions prior to 2007. What are the actual if conditions? There are several techniques to circumvent this limitations, with nested IFs. On Aug 20, 1:18 pm, Ron Rosenfeld wrote: On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:14:01 -0700, Dave wrote: I am trying to string together IF functions to fulfill my requirements. However if i need more than 7 conditions (from my understanding the nested IF functions only go up to 7 cases) is there an alternative to this that would give me the same results? Thanks Yes there is. --ron |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ExcelBanter.com