Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.misc
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have recently begun to experience random problems with conditional IF
formulas not returning zero but a very very tiny negative number, which causes wrong results in other cells which rely on a zero value from the IF formula to calculate correctly. In a reservoir routing speadsheet with say 2000 rows of calculations and 1000 that should be zero, two are not, but tracing them can take hours expanding every cell display to 15 or more decimal places to find which are not zero. I have never had this problem before. It started in Office XP, but today I upgraded to Office 2003 and the error is still there. Using ROUND everywhere is a work around but significantly increases the size of the spreadsheet. Does anyone know the cause and solution? -- Hydrotechchris |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Excel: How to insert carriage returns in a formula to manipulate t | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Carriage Returns Excel 2003 | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Formula format in excel that returns an "error" if there is a blan | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
formula returns error in version 2003 only | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Date Value Funtion in Excel 2003 returns an error, but not in Exce | Excel Worksheet Functions |