Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is "INDIRECT" the cause of these problems?
About 10 days ago via this medium I was shown how to count the # of
worksheets using "INDIRECT". Since Monday I have been struggling with a workbook that seems self-corrupting. My workbook has about 100 worksheets; each worksheet contains an amortization schedule for the debt on a vehicle. All amortization schedules have an identical structure. Size of workbook is just under 30MB. Problem is the workbook will not open properly. Error messages include "cannot read file" and "damage to the file was so extensive that repairs were not possible". In my development of this workbook I progressively saved under different version names and have been able to surmise that my problem began when I made a modification to the amortization table while grouping all the worksheets together (at that point probably <50 worksheets). Normally this should not have been a problem. My question is, does EXCEL not "work" properly when I have a combination of very large workbook and INDIRECT? My plan is to start over limiting workbooks to 10 worksheets only and linking workbooks to combine results. Any suggestions/wisdom for avoiding this mess in future would be appreciated. Many thanks, Stephen Powell |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
is there a NON-volatile version of INDIRECT ?? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Using Indirect en direct cell references | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Indirect another wookbook | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Exel Problems! | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Problems pasting images into Excel | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |