Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.charting
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, in microsoft.public.excel.charting,
T. Jenkins said: I probably wasn't clear before. The bottom line is that I wanted the total height of the stacked bar to be the sum of the individual values. So if my data included 50, 100, and -25, then the top of the bar should be at 125. With a basic stacked bar, the height is 150, and it appears that the -25 has no affect. My workaround was to create a separate line graph showing the totals of each data set. This works, but I was hoping to just use the stacked bar. How do you think such a thing would look? Either the 100 or the 50 would have to be subtracted from in order to total 125, and then there is no stacked bar chart any more. Have you considered a waterfall graph instead? -- Del Cotter NB Personal replies to this post will send email to , which goes to a spam folder-- please send your email to del3 instead. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Use values instead of labels on X-axis in Area/Stacked Area Charts | Charts and Charting in Excel | |||
Stacked column with negative values | Charts and Charting in Excel | |||
hiding zero values in stacked bar charts | Charts and Charting in Excel | |||
Negative or zero values cannot be plotted correctly on log charts | Charts and Charting in Excel | |||
Bar charts with negative values and label position | Charts and Charting in Excel |