Hi

I have plotted a chart using a logarithmic scale - is it true to say
that on a logarithmic scale
the distance between the points are proportional - whereas on a linear
scale the distance between the figures are relative??

Thanks

In a word: NO

--
Bernard V Liengme
www.stfx.ca/people/bliengme
remove caps from email

wrote in message
oups.com...
Hi

I have plotted a chart using a logarithmic scale - is it true to say
that on a logarithmic scale
the distance between the points are proportional - whereas on a linear
scale the distance between the figures are relative??

Thanks

On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, in microsoft.public.excel.charting,
said:

I have plotted a chart using a logarithmic scale - is it true to say
that on a logarithmic scale
the distance between the points are proportional - whereas on a linear
scale the distance between the figures are relative??

If you mean what I think you mean, then yes: the distance between 1 and
1.2 is the same as the distance between 100 and 120, or 5 and 6, or 15
and 18. It's a mathematical property of logarithms.

--
Del Cotter
NB Personal replies to this post will send email to ,
which goes to a spam folder-- please send your email to del3 instead.