I'm not an access users, but I thought it also only supported 256
columns/fields.

Maybe creating a real relational database would mean that there wouldn't be a
need for all 256 fields????

Bernard Liengme wrote:

If this were possible then 256 would not be the maximum
Your solution lies with Excel 2007 with 16,384 columns, or with Access 2003
best wishes
--
Bernard V Liengme
Microsoft Excel MVP
http://people.stfx.ca/bliengme
remove caps from email

"Moon Angel" <Moon wrote in message
...
Is it possible to extend the maximum number of columns in Excel 2003 to
more
than 256?

--

Dave Peterson