Just to ensure you understand my sentiments, when I said absolutely not, I
was referring to the statement ... When unsure, shut up?

Bob

"Epinn" wrote in message
...
This is a continuation of previous discussion. (See below *****).

Bob, I think an online forum is different from a classroom situation. I do
feel there is some kind of an "ownership" attached to a thread. I am new to
this Newsgroup business and I am still learning etiquette. Feeling
acceptance in a group is important to all posters including myself. Please
feel free to *email* me any time if you see any need for improvement.
Comments are welcome from others; but please be kind and gentle and don't
throw a pie at me. ;)

I usually start a new thread when the subject is *unrelated*. Bob, you have
seen me do that with my own thread. If my questions/comments relate to the
scenario or data set of the thread, it is quite a temptation to just join in
the discussion. I once originated a thread and another person posted a
*similar* question under my thread and I didn't mind at all. I find it
easier to group similar issues together. Of course, everyone feels
differently. Some posters may feel "possessive" towards his/her thread.
Some may be shy to announce that they don't understand the formula. In that
case, they may thank me for saying that I need some explanation. ;) There
are just too many factors in play. All in all, I think it is better to play
safe and start a new thread although we may sacrifice ease of reference and
archive.

One reason I run into situations that others may not may be because I am
quite passionate about learning. Hope you all can accept this fact.

Thank you for your attention.

Epinn

************************************************** **************************
*****
(2) Absolutely not. If it were me, I think I would open a new thread as a
discussion thread, referencing back to the thread that made you stop and
think. That way, the OPs thread is left to run its course (we have to be
careful not to intimidate/scare off posters from asking follow-ups), but
your questions get a very clear forum of their own which people can join or
ignore as is there wont.

But never shut up, others will also read the threads and learn from them. I
go the COLUMN(A2:F4)^0 trick from this, and I am sure I will use that in
future.

--
HTH

Bob Phillips
************************************************** **************************
*****
(1) This is a sensitive issue and it has always been a concern for
me. I try to apologize before anyone complains. I always seem to have more
questions than anyone around. If I think open group discussion, archive,
easy reference for future research etc. then I can justify asking my
questions or providing my comments under the original poster's thread.
Having said this, I do understand that the poster has "ownership" and
certain privilege and it is also natural that he/she feels "possessive" and
doesn't want others to ask many questions or "take over" ......

I usually hold off my questions until the poster has got the answers and
"left" the forum.

What is the right approach? When unsure, shut up?

Epinn