Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.setup
|
|||
|
|||
Excel - should handle UNLIMITED records like QuatroPro!
The 65,000 record limit in Excel is archaic. Works fine for business, but
the scientific community is shackled with this 1980's artifact from 640K DOS memory constraint. While the programmers are at it, fix the bug in Access that only exports 65,000 records with a fixed 2 decimal place number. ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...ic.excel.setup |
#2
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.setup
|
|||
|
|||
Excel - should handle UNLIMITED records like QuatroPro!
Hi Bob,
The row limit is fixed in Excel 12 (rows not records) http://blogs.msdn.com/excel/archive/...26/474258.aspx The total number of available rows in Excel Old Limit: 64k (2^16) New Limit: 1M (2^20) -- which is 1,048,576 rows For a list of posting by Microsoft employees see http://www.contextures.com/xlExcel12Info01.html If you have something you want fixed you probably have to wait for Excel 12 to come out and then put your request in withing two weeks if you want to see it happen within the next 10 years after that. Or as IBM would might reply -- fixed in the next version, if there is a next version. At least you know there will be an Excel 12. |
#3
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.setup
|
|||
|
|||
Excel - should handle UNLIMITED records like QuatroPro!
David,
It's a pet peeve. There are places in the scientific community where a million rows still doesn't cut it. There are many datasets in the oil and gas industry that routinely exceed this restriction. What programmers and casual users don't realize is that operations within a row can be accomplished quite easily within Access , but mathematical operations between rows or a series of rows is more efficient in Excel. The export problem with more than two decimal places is a real fiasco when trying to export a 6 place Latitude-Longitude in decimal degrees. Thanks for the feedback. Bob "David McRitchie" wrote: Hi Bob, The row limit is fixed in Excel 12 (rows not records) http://blogs.msdn.com/excel/archive/...26/474258.aspx The total number of available rows in Excel Old Limit: 64k (2^16) New Limit: 1M (2^20) -- which is 1,048,576 rows For a list of posting by Microsoft employees see http://www.contextures.com/xlExcel12Info01.html If you have something you want fixed you probably have to wait for Excel 12 to come out and then put your request in withing two weeks if you want to see it happen within the next 10 years after that. Or as IBM would might reply -- fixed in the next version, if there is a next version. At least you know there will be an Excel 12. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stop excel from dropping the 0 in the beginning of a number? | Setting up and Configuration of Excel | |||
Import records from Access to Excel | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Excel should handle more than 65,536 rows. | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Database records from excel templates | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Duplicate records in Excel | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |