Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.links
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all, I have discovered a difference of behaviour which I would be
interested in hearing others' views on... we have a master spreadsheet which contains links to other workbooks, some in the same location (or subfolders of) x: and some in a different location altogether, y:. All is fine as long as the master is not moved... if it is moved, the links to workbooks in the same area break, but the links to those on x: are retained. Clearly, if a link is to the same location, then paths are stored as relative, hence break when you move the workkbook.. However, if I create all the links using UNC paths rather than a drive mapping then all are retained and work correctly... this is too complicated for our users though. My question is, can we change the behaviour of the way links are stored, so that it retains the full path to linked files rather than just a relative one? Many thanks for any responses... oh, this is Office XP, Excel 2002. We are migrating to Office 2003 at end of next year, does the behaviour change? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
broken links | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Broken Links.... | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Broken Links | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
broken links message still popping up | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Links are broken and cannot fix | Excel Worksheet Functions |