Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not sure as to the why of it. Here's a previous thread with a possible
workaround: http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...d-8da1cfc73830 tj "Creating Order Forms is Fun" wrote: |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you
"tjtjjtjt" wrote: Not sure as to the why of it. Here's a previous thread with a possible workaround: http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...d-8da1cfc73830 tj "Creating Order Forms is Fun" wrote: |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm assuming because the spell Checker has a function to change the value-which would go
against the concept of a protected sheet(?). Just a guess. -- Regards; Rob ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Creating Order Forms is Fun" <Creating Order Forms is wrote in message ... |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
it should be able to spell check fields that aren't protected
"RWN" wrote: I'm assuming because the spell Checker has a function to change the value-which would go against the concept of a protected sheet(?). Just a guess. -- Regards; Rob ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Creating Order Forms is Fun" <Creating Order Forms is wrote in message ... |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
T
Spell check of "should" comes up with "it would be nice". http://register.microsoft.com/mswish/suggestion.asp Gord Dibben Excel MVP On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 06:23:06 -0800, "T" wrote: it should be able to spell check fields that aren't protected "RWN" wrote: I'm assuming because the spell Checker has a function to change the value-which would go against the concept of a protected sheet(?). Just a guess. -- Regards; Rob ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Creating Order Forms is Fun" <Creating Order Forms is wrote in message ... |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gord Dibben wrote...
Spell check of "should" comes up with "it would be nice". http://register.microsoft.com/mswish/suggestion.asp .... FWIW, Lotus 123 Release 5 (released in 1994, over a decade ago) included a spell check tool that worked in protected worksheets. It checked both protected and unprotected cells, though misspellings could only be corrected in unprotected cells. FWIW, OpenOffice Calc also provides spell check in protected worksheets. Excel also disables Edit Replace in protected worksheets (while 123 provides this functionality, as does Gnumeric 1.4; while OpenOffice Calc disables replace even in unprotected cells in protected worksheets, it does display words not in its dictionary with wavy underlines just at it does in its word processor - if only Office provided similarly intelligent integration between Word and Excel). Sure looks like Microsoft slapped these features into Excel so they could put them on the spec sheets but didn't expend much programmer time tying up all the lose ends. Such a shock if so! Either Office is a single integrated package, in which case useful features in one 'tool' in the package should be available to the other tools in the package (e.g., underlining words not in the dictionary, providing Word's Find and Replace extended wildcards to Excel Find and Replace), or Office is just a collection of stand-alone applications, in which case Excel hasn't had a true major upgrade since Excel 2000 (only XML functionality would support a legitimate claim to major version upgrade, but that's problematic since it isn't available except in the high-end Office packages). |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to enable font color on protected worksheet? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Syntax to check protected status of a worksheet? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
spell check protected document | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Linking items GREATER THAN O on another worksheet in the same Work | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
How use group and ungroup functions while worksheet is protected | Excel Worksheet Functions |