Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is a function in Excel called Subtotals (accessible via the Data menu)
which is supposed to group together and subtotal rows of data. The function can be used multiple times to provide nested subtotals to calculate, in this case Mobile phone bills in a large company. When we upgraded the machine from Office 2000 to Excel 2003, there appeared to be a problem with this function when we tried to create these nested subtotals. If we use the term €˜Directorate for the first layer of sub-totals, and the term €˜Department for the second layer of sub-totals, then the sub-total for the last Department in a particular Directorate appeared below the sub-total for the Directorate as a whole. This means that the phone bill for the last department in each Directorate was listed against the next Directorate down the list. This problem appeared with or without blanks in the Department field. We tested this in 3 different environments; Excel 2003 on Windows XP, Excel 2000 on Windows XP, and Excel 2000 on Windows 2000. Problem only appeared in Excel 2003 and Windows XP environment, so the common denominator appeared to be Excel 2003? -- Regards Dave |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
subtotal a range of cells on a different worksheet | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Subtotal vs Pivot table - or best way | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
subtotal - pivot table - or better function | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Subtotal Bug in Excel 2003 | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Subtotal of Subtotal displays Grand Total in wrong row | Excel Worksheet Functions |