Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In Excel 2000 (and earlier), this example.
A B C D 1 1 1^2 1^3 2.3 2 2 2^2 2^3 4.2 3 3 3^2 3^3 4.7 4 4 4^2 4^3 5.1 5 . . . and so on =INDEX(LINEST(D1:D5,A1:C5),1) gives the first coefficient for a 3rd order polynomial fit to the data in column D. =INDEX(LINEST(D1:D5,A1:C5),2) gives the 2nd, =INDEX(LINEST(D1:D5,A1:C5),3) the 3rd =INDEX(LINEST(D1:D5,A1:C5),4) gives the 4th. In the form ax^3+bx^2+cx+d, I can find the fit for the data. The above formulas give me a,b,c and d. (This can also be used as a single array formula, dropping the "INDEX" part) Now in Excel 2003, the above formulas will only return a 2nd order fit. the results are ax^2+bx+c. The first coefficient is 0. Any thoughts on how generate the third (or forth, or fifth, or sixth) order fit. This is driving me crazy because it is one of the things I use constantly. I will be forced to go back to 2000 if I can't resolve this. (And the idiotic "fx" in place of "=" in the formula bar) Cheers Incoherent |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
higher order polynomial fit line x-coefficients | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
how, in excel, can i generate a number, eg consecutive order nos | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
LINEST bug with cubic polynomials in Excel 2003 | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Linest - Why did they do that? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |