Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, February 11, 2003 11:45:34 PM UTC-5, Jerry W. Lewis wrote:
Agreed. Harlan Grove wrote: "Jerry W. Lewis" wrote... http://groups.google.com/groups?selm...40mediaone.net provides formulas that do not require array formulas and are more numerically accurate than the equations Harlan suggested. His approach is mathematically exact, but numerically unstable. Precisely! The OP asked for what Excel uses, and that's what I gave. Mathematically exact but numerically unstable, just like Excel. -- Public Service Announcement Don't attach files to postings in nonbinary newsgroups like this one. If you have multiple regressors the SLOPE and INTERCEPT functions will not work. I can't see how to avoid Matrix algebra in that case. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
standard error of regression coefficient | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Excel error in R-squared computation in exponential regression | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Regression - Standard Error X Variable 1 | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
HOw do I set up Standard Error in a spreadsheet? | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Standard Error | Excel Worksheet Functions |