Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a rather large worksheet, columns to AN, rows to 369, and currently
transfers data across about 6 worksheets with more to come. I'm building a price list with a long list a variables and then setting the prices into a special format, so I cannot afford the data loss. When I sort my list for a variety of reasons, the formula references do not maintain the original cell references I need. I tried the absolute reference, bad idea. totally lost the information. Had to rebuild. Tried partial absolute refernces, some success, but a big loss on some. Is there a good way to build a formula that will allow for cell references to remain intact under various data sorts? Thanks in advance! John |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I do not understand what you need, but check out the indirect() function in
Help. =indirect("AA31") will always refer to AA31, no matter what you do to the spreadsheet. "MarcoPolo" wrote: I have a rather large worksheet, columns to AN, rows to 369, and currently transfers data across about 6 worksheets with more to come. I'm building a price list with a long list a variables and then setting the prices into a special format, so I cannot afford the data loss. When I sort my list for a variety of reasons, the formula references do not maintain the original cell references I need. I tried the absolute reference, bad idea. totally lost the information. Had to rebuild. Tried partial absolute refernces, some success, but a big loss on some. Is there a good way to build a formula that will allow for cell references to remain intact under various data sorts? Thanks in advance! John |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, lets see. The rows 5 - 269 are for the bill of materials with a toiatal
in column X. Rows 274 through 426 have another bill of materials that affect the totals in the first 265 rows. When I sort the second set, the totals in the first set are affected. I can't live with this, checking each total everytime I do any manipulations. I do have a common column, so whenI need to find data I can do a cntl-F and get to my data quickly. Thanks for your help! John "bj" wrote: I do not understand what you need, but check out the indirect() function in Help. =indirect("AA31") will always refer to AA31, no matter what you do to the spreadsheet. "MarcoPolo" wrote: I have a rather large worksheet, columns to AN, rows to 369, and currently transfers data across about 6 worksheets with more to come. I'm building a price list with a long list a variables and then setting the prices into a special format, so I cannot afford the data loss. When I sort my list for a variety of reasons, the formula references do not maintain the original cell references I need. I tried the absolute reference, bad idea. totally lost the information. Had to rebuild. Tried partial absolute refernces, some success, but a big loss on some. Is there a good way to build a formula that will allow for cell references to remain intact under various data sorts? Thanks in advance! John |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
When I change the formula to read as you specifiied, I lose all data. I have
a #VALUE error on all cells. Is there no way to kepp the cell referece data, inside a formula, maintain that cell data integrity. The formula =sum($a$5+$b$5+$c$5)*$w$1 does not allow me to sort the data by any particlar column. The data that is in each of the specified cells, does not follow with the sort procedure. Is there a solution to this problem? I tried removing the absolute cell refences, but that didn't work either. Any help would be appreciated. John "bj" wrote: I do not understand what you need, but check out the indirect() function in Help. =indirect("AA31") will always refer to AA31, no matter what you do to the spreadsheet. "MarcoPolo" wrote: I have a rather large worksheet, columns to AN, rows to 369, and currently transfers data across about 6 worksheets with more to come. I'm building a price list with a long list a variables and then setting the prices into a special format, so I cannot afford the data loss. When I sort my list for a variety of reasons, the formula references do not maintain the original cell references I need. I tried the absolute reference, bad idea. totally lost the information. Had to rebuild. Tried partial absolute refernces, some success, but a big loss on some. Is there a good way to build a formula that will allow for cell references to remain intact under various data sorts? Thanks in advance! John |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sorting Data that feeds into other formulas.... | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
sort data without formulas in other cells changing? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
HELP! How do you--> Lock a set of rows but also link worksheets to | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
How do I sort a column of formulas in Excel? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
How do I sort a column of formulas in Excel? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |