Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
New Soul
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why are cumulative interest payment calculations different?

I get very different answers when using
CUMIPMT(rate,nper,pv,start_period,end_period,type) and an equation I've seen
others use to calculate cumulative interest paid (=(annual rate*present
value)/12) * number of months held).

Can someone explain why these equations produce different results? I need
to ensure I'm using the correct calculation.
  #2   Report Post  
Dave Breitenbach
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If I understand your question...
The CUMIPMT function gives total interest paid on a loan over a given time
period, let's say 12 months. In month 2 and forward, the balance on which
the interest is calculated is now lower(after amortization), than the
original amount, or pv.

In the second formula you are using, the pv (I'm assuming you mean original
balance or 1st balance) does not change, so this will give you total interest
paid if there was no principal being paid (no amortization) on the loan.
This amount will be significantly higher than the first formula.

hth,
Dave

"New Soul" wrote:

I get very different answers when using
CUMIPMT(rate,nper,pv,start_period,end_period,type) and an equation I've seen
others use to calculate cumulative interest paid (=(annual rate*present
value)/12) * number of months held).

Can someone explain why these equations produce different results? I need
to ensure I'm using the correct calculation.

  #3   Report Post  
New Soul
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks Dave. That's just what I needed to know.

Greg

"Dave Breitenbach" wrote:

If I understand your question...
The CUMIPMT function gives total interest paid on a loan over a given time
period, let's say 12 months. In month 2 and forward, the balance on which
the interest is calculated is now lower(after amortization), than the
original amount, or pv.

In the second formula you are using, the pv (I'm assuming you mean original
balance or 1st balance) does not change, so this will give you total interest
paid if there was no principal being paid (no amortization) on the loan.
This amount will be significantly higher than the first formula.

hth,
Dave

"New Soul" wrote:

I get very different answers when using
CUMIPMT(rate,nper,pv,start_period,end_period,type) and an equation I've seen
others use to calculate cumulative interest paid (=(annual rate*present
value)/12) * number of months held).

Can someone explain why these equations produce different results? I need
to ensure I'm using the correct calculation.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calculate total interest earned on a loan and monthly payment Matt Stanley Excel Worksheet Functions 4 May 4th 23 03:42 AM
Loan Schedule with Balloon Payment R0bert Neville Excel Worksheet Functions 7 April 22nd 23 12:08 PM
Interest only payment origin8r Excel Worksheet Functions 3 July 14th 05 03:53 AM
Trying to Manipulate a Mortgage Payment (HELP!) DC Excel Worksheet Functions 1 February 4th 05 05:49 PM
Calculating interest on number of days in the period Ron Excel Worksheet Functions 0 January 18th 05 12:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ExcelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Microsoft Excel"