Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 3, 9:54*am, Bernd P wrote:
On 3 Jun., 02:40, exceluser wrote: Can someone show me how to accomplish the following by using the LARGE function "WITHOUT" using an array ? I'm trying to rank each product (most, second most, etc.) by weight. * *Data worksheet * * *A * * * * *B * * * * * * * C * *1 Product * *Type * * * * * *Pounds * *2 Orange * * Fruit * * * * * 600 * *3 Tomato * * Vegetable * * * * * * * 500 * *4 Apple * * * * * * *Fruit * * * * * 700 * *5 Potato * * * * * * Vegetable * * * * * * * 1,000 Using the LARGE function, the goal is to get the following result on another worksheet: * *Order worksheet * * *A * * * * *B * * * * * * * C * *1 Product * *1 * * * * * * * 2 * *2 Fruit * * * * * * *Apple * * * * * Orange * *3 Vegetable *Potato * * * * *Tomato On the Order worksheet, the following formula is the one I'm using with an array: * *{=IFERROR(INDEX(Data!$A$1:$C$5,MATCH(LARGE(IF(Dat a!$B$1:$B$5= $A2,Data!$C$1:$C$5,""),B$1),Data!$C$1:$C$5,0),1)," ")} Does anyone know how to get the same result without using an array - even if it uses another function ? Hello, I suggest to use array functions to get your result right: In sheet Data, enter into D1 "Type Rank" and into D2 =SUMPRODUCT(--($B2=$B$2:$B$999),--($C2<$C$2:$C$999))+SUMPRODUCT(--($B2= $B$2:$B2),--($C2=$C$2:$C2)) and copy down. Then you can array-enter in sheet Order into B2: =INDEX(Data!$A$2:$A$999,MATCH($A2&"|"&B$1,Data!$B$ 2:$B$999&"|"&Data!$D $2:$D$999,0)) and copy down and across. If you like to compare with other approaches, test with Pounds data like 1,1,1,1 or 0,0,0,0, for example. Further examples you can find athttp://sulprobil.com/html/sorting.html Regards, Bernd- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bernd, Thank you very much for that fast and very detailed response. The reason that I'm trying to avoid using an array is that the sheer number of cells that would contain this formula (15,000+) would cause my computer to lockup for over an hour and a half while it recalculates. I recently replaced an array with a formula using the SUMIF function and that rewrite alone reduced the calculation time from 2.5 hours to 1.5 hours. Now I'm just trying to eliminate that last 1.5 hours which is the reason for my original post. It looks like I'll be able to avoid the array with the formula that Steve suggested above. I also checked out your website and it was very helpful. Again, I appreciate the time you spent creating the solution above. Exceluser |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Criteria governing "LARGE" function | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Function to find 'n'th largest alphanumeric field (like "Large") | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
How do I use "offset" function in "array formula"? | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Looking up the results from the function "LARGE" | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Utility to "clean up" or "defrag" large Excel file | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |