Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This formula is meant to count independent entries in A1:A20.
=ROUND(SUMPRODUCT(1/COUNTIF(A1:A20,A1:A20)),0) Can anyone make this better? I am not talking about using Absolute references, but ways to modify it so it works in every case. For instance, at first I had an empty cell in my range and the #DIV/0 error was returned. I don't fully understand the two negatives in front of some formulas, but I am wondering if that would work better, too? =ROUND(SUMPRODUCT(1/--COUNTIF(A1:A20,A1:A20)),0) Thanks for any help. -- Brad E. |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
here's an alternative that ignores blanks =SUMPRODUCT((A1:A20<"")/COUNTIF(A1:A10,A1:A20&"")) the double unary (--) coerce true or false into one or zero but do nothing in your formula. -- Mike When competing hypotheses are otherwise equal, adopt the hypothesis that introduces the fewest assumptions while still sufficiently answering the question. "Brad E." wrote: This formula is meant to count independent entries in A1:A20. =ROUND(SUMPRODUCT(1/COUNTIF(A1:A20,A1:A20)),0) Can anyone make this better? I am not talking about using Absolute references, but ways to modify it so it works in every case. For instance, at first I had an empty cell in my range and the #DIV/0 error was returned. I don't fully understand the two negatives in front of some formulas, but I am wondering if that would work better, too? =ROUND(SUMPRODUCT(1/--COUNTIF(A1:A20,A1:A20)),0) Thanks for any help. -- Brad E. |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I should have added there are other (better) ways to do this and Bernd P has a well presented web page on how it should be done http://www.sulprobil.com/html/count_unique.html -- Mike When competing hypotheses are otherwise equal, adopt the hypothesis that introduces the fewest assumptions while still sufficiently answering the question. "Brad E." wrote: This formula is meant to count independent entries in A1:A20. =ROUND(SUMPRODUCT(1/COUNTIF(A1:A20,A1:A20)),0) Can anyone make this better? I am not talking about using Absolute references, but ways to modify it so it works in every case. For instance, at first I had an empty cell in my range and the #DIV/0 error was returned. I don't fully understand the two negatives in front of some formulas, but I am wondering if that would work better, too? =ROUND(SUMPRODUCT(1/--COUNTIF(A1:A20,A1:A20)),0) Thanks for any help. -- Brad E. |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is Bernd's webpage that i was looking for where he specifically comments
on the solution I gave you http://www.sulprobil.com/html/excel_don_ts.html -- Mike When competing hypotheses are otherwise equal, adopt the hypothesis that introduces the fewest assumptions while still sufficiently answering the question. "Brad E." wrote: This formula is meant to count independent entries in A1:A20. =ROUND(SUMPRODUCT(1/COUNTIF(A1:A20,A1:A20)),0) Can anyone make this better? I am not talking about using Absolute references, but ways to modify it so it works in every case. For instance, at first I had an empty cell in my range and the #DIV/0 error was returned. I don't fully understand the two negatives in front of some formulas, but I am wondering if that would work better, too? =ROUND(SUMPRODUCT(1/--COUNTIF(A1:A20,A1:A20)),0) Thanks for any help. -- Brad E. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to list items instead of counting them with Pivot Table | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Counting items in a list | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Counting number of text items in list | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Counting number of text items in list | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
counting number of particular items in a list | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) |