Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
In Microsoft Works, to change the order of a rows of cells, I can cut a row of cells, paste it into another row, and it "bumps" all the rows beneath it down. In Excel 2003, I have to first insert a blank row, then cut and paste the row of cells into that blank row. Similarly, in Works, if I want to eliminate a blank row, I can cut it, then all the rows beneath it will move up to fill the space. In Excel, I have to cut all of the rows beneath the vacant cells, and then paste them in their proper position. Is there a way to change the default settings in Excel to behave the way they do in Works? Thank you. |
#2
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No problem in Excel:
Method a) Cut source row, select target row (the row that should be shifted down), right-click your mouse and select "Insert cut cells". Method b) Select the source and drag with the mouse to the new location while pressing SHIFT key. Joerg "robin" wrote in message ... Hi, In Microsoft Works, to change the order of a rows of cells, I can cut a row of cells, paste it into another row, and it "bumps" all the rows beneath it down. In Excel 2003, I have to first insert a blank row, then cut and paste the row of cells into that blank row. Similarly, in Works, if I want to eliminate a blank row, I can cut it, then all the rows beneath it will move up to fill the space. In Excel, I have to cut all of the rows beneath the vacant cells, and then paste them in their proper position. Is there a way to change the default settings in Excel to behave the way they do in Works? Thank you. |
#3
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joerg, method (a) worked great. Thanks! I couldn't get method (b) to work,
though. After I select the source row, if I try to drag it I end up selecting more rows instead. It's as if pressing SHIFT doesn't do anything. robin "Joerg Mochikun" wrote in message ... No problem in Excel: Method a) Cut source row, select target row (the row that should be shifted down), right-click your mouse and select "Insert cut cells". Method b) Select the source and drag with the mouse to the new location while pressing SHIFT key. Joerg "robin" wrote in message ... Hi, In Microsoft Works, to change the order of a rows of cells, I can cut a row of cells, paste it into another row, and it "bumps" all the rows beneath it down. In Excel 2003, I have to first insert a blank row, then cut and paste the row of cells into that blank row. Similarly, in Works, if I want to eliminate a blank row, I can cut it, then all the rows beneath it will move up to fill the space. In Excel, I have to cut all of the rows beneath the vacant cells, and then paste them in their proper position. Is there a way to change the default settings in Excel to behave the way they do in Works? Thank you. |
#4
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't cut the row, just delete it and all below will move up.
Select the row header and CTRL + hyphen. Gord Dibben MS Excel MVP On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:06:52 -0700, "robin" wrote: Joerg, method (a) worked great. Thanks! I couldn't get method (b) to work, though. After I select the source row, if I try to drag it I end up selecting more rows instead. It's as if pressing SHIFT doesn't do anything. robin "Joerg Mochikun" wrote in message ... No problem in Excel: Method a) Cut source row, select target row (the row that should be shifted down), right-click your mouse and select "Insert cut cells". Method b) Select the source and drag with the mouse to the new location while pressing SHIFT key. Joerg "robin" wrote in message ... Hi, In Microsoft Works, to change the order of a rows of cells, I can cut a row of cells, paste it into another row, and it "bumps" all the rows beneath it down. In Excel 2003, I have to first insert a blank row, then cut and paste the row of cells into that blank row. Similarly, in Works, if I want to eliminate a blank row, I can cut it, then all the rows beneath it will move up to fill the space. In Excel, I have to cut all of the rows beneath the vacant cells, and then paste them in their proper position. Is there a way to change the default settings in Excel to behave the way they do in Works? Thank you. |
#5
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, Gord, that works for me, too.
robin "Gord Dibben" <gorddibbATshawDOTca wrote in message ... Don't cut the row, just delete it and all below will move up. Select the row header and CTRL + hyphen. Gord Dibben MS Excel MVP On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:06:52 -0700, "robin" wrote: Joerg, method (a) worked great. Thanks! I couldn't get method (b) to work, though. After I select the source row, if I try to drag it I end up selecting more rows instead. It's as if pressing SHIFT doesn't do anything. robin "Joerg Mochikun" wrote in message ... No problem in Excel: Method a) Cut source row, select target row (the row that should be shifted down), right-click your mouse and select "Insert cut cells". Method b) Select the source and drag with the mouse to the new location while pressing SHIFT key. Joerg "robin" wrote in message ... Hi, In Microsoft Works, to change the order of a rows of cells, I can cut a row of cells, paste it into another row, and it "bumps" all the rows beneath it down. In Excel 2003, I have to first insert a blank row, then cut and paste the row of cells into that blank row. Similarly, in Works, if I want to eliminate a blank row, I can cut it, then all the rows beneath it will move up to fill the space. In Excel, I have to cut all of the rows beneath the vacant cells, and then paste them in their proper position. Is there a way to change the default settings in Excel to behave the way they do in Works? Thank you. |
#6
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robin, for method b): After selecting the row, you must move the mouse
cursor a bit to the right. You stayed at the row header at the left . Noticed the splitbar mouse cursor (small bar with up and down arrows attached)? If you press SHIFT you select more rows. Sure that's not what you wanted to do. However if you move your mouse cursor to the right, the mouse cursor will change into one with little arrows in all 4 directions (I think it's called the 'Move' cursor). If you now press SHIFT and move the row with the mouse, you can switch rows. Joerg "robin" wrote in message ... Joerg, method (a) worked great. Thanks! I couldn't get method (b) to work, though. After I select the source row, if I try to drag it I end up selecting more rows instead. It's as if pressing SHIFT doesn't do anything. robin "Joerg Mochikun" wrote in message ... No problem in Excel: Method a) Cut source row, select target row (the row that should be shifted down), right-click your mouse and select "Insert cut cells". Method b) Select the source and drag with the mouse to the new location while pressing SHIFT key. Joerg "robin" wrote in message ... Hi, In Microsoft Works, to change the order of a rows of cells, I can cut a row of cells, paste it into another row, and it "bumps" all the rows beneath it down. In Excel 2003, I have to first insert a blank row, then cut and paste the row of cells into that blank row. Similarly, in Works, if I want to eliminate a blank row, I can cut it, then all the rows beneath it will move up to fill the space. In Excel, I have to cut all of the rows beneath the vacant cells, and then paste them in their proper position. Is there a way to change the default settings in Excel to behave the way they do in Works? Thank you. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Enter Key + Dragging Cells / Moving Cells | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Moving between cells | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
moving cells | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Arrow Keys Moving Window Frame instead of Moving Between Cells | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Moving cells | Excel Worksheet Functions |