Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to microsoft.public.excel.worksheet.functions
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
Please tell me workaround given my numbers are in ascending order and a need a minimum. I have to find the minimum value greater than a number in a row of numbers placed in ascending order. The MATCH function requires the numbers to be in descending order with last parameter of Match set to -1. Match_type Behavior 1 or omitted MATCH finds the largest value that is less than or equal to lookup_value. The values in the lookup_array argument must be placed in ascending order, for example: ...-2, -1, 0, 1, 2, ..., A-Z, FALSE, TRUE. 0 MATCH finds the first value that is exactly equal to lookup_value. The values in the lookup_array argument can be in any order. -1 MATCH finds the smallest value that is greater than or equal to lookup_value. The values in the lookup_array argument must be placed in descending order, for example: TRUE, FALSE, Z-A, ...2, 1, 0, -1, -2, ..., and so on. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
how can we get unique values in match function for same match key. | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
index match array function-returning only first match, need last. | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Match as well as does not match array function | Excel Discussion (Misc queries) | |||
Offset function with nested match function not finding host ss. | Excel Worksheet Functions | |||
Emulate Index/Match combo function w/ VBA custom function | Excel Worksheet Functions |